Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

حسابات سكيور

@DDDDDD5DD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001738970692
TypeChannel
Username@DDDDDD5DD
Descriptionحگ ترتيب
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 3 March 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/DDDDDD5DD

Growth

57 August 2026 — 5 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:015no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:055first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 3 March 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 April 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
147
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2022 to 25 April 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Apr 2022, 19:28 UTC151 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

2pbi:qwert12345 8jlv:12345678900 7vpg:11221122 0q2b:1q2w3e4r5t y41l:Ww112233 8b5z:00000000 g6i4:19981998 e0l5:12345678900 s7pe:1020304050 22qz:12345qwert 3olu:1q2w3e4r5t twb0:1q2w3e4r 4j.u:00000000 8dyv:1029384756 0qwd:12345678900 v4rq:qwert12345 ku0m:Aa123123 4fu7:100200300 3uw0:1020304050 ip1c:1020304050 r9py:19981998 ac0q:11221122 upmz:ali12345 vm4y:1q2w3e4r5t z9n3:1020304050 8fc5:Aa123123 9pq7:ahmed123 c74l:12345

👍1

25 Apr 2022, 19:28 UTC125 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

q.5j:11221122 y.b5:20012001 y.5j:1020304050 u.mf:19981998 o.j4:123123123123 o.8d:123123123123 o.4v:1020304050 p.5n:1020304050 s.18:123123123123 d.of:19951995 _xvq 11223344 d.jp:11221122 d.34:11221122 d.9n:1020304050 g._s:11221122 l.9v:1020304050 c.5y:11221122 v.c8:11112222 b.q3:20002000 n.77:11221122 n._s:11112222 m.ut:1020304050 m.5e:19991999 1.f2:11112222 d8_6 :jjkkll 3.1m:11221122 5.cd:11112222 q_u3:11221122 q_8y:

👍1

10 Apr 2022, 08:37 UTC119 viewsread 13 August 2026

x:qwer1234 wp.u:Aa123123 22k0:00000000 3ajo:100200300 ron_:1q2w3e4r5t 2j.t:Aa112233 1fbl:1234qwer esz2:qwert12345 x4hs:11221122 _10m:12345678900 08f7:19971997 uyt1:ahmed123 njwz:1029384756 uhlk:00000000 83kc:19981998 6skr:Aa112233 h5ph:100200300 70l2:ali12345 wm8w:1020304050 gbl9:100200300 x4st:q1w2e3r4 f0g2:19991999 b5vx:1q2w3e4r5t xldl:1q2w3e4r5t hw_7:123456789 _a70:Aa112233 9bth:11221122 7nh5:12345678900 qvnu:qwer

10 Apr 2022, 08:36 UTC141 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ghaa:ghaa333 ftzz:ftzz333 wkyp:wkyp333 rmsq:rmsq333 37xz:37xz333 3hie:3hie333 gru6:gru6333 vit9:vit9333 n6a8:n6a8nnn wtmm:wtmm111 7228:7228222 2lii:2lii222 ffuo:ffuo222 cgbx:cgbx222 vose:vose222 0lvu:0lvu222 fy3j:fy3j222 gve2:gve2222 xd1s:xd1s222 cfy1:cfy1222 kkka:kkkaaaa ngmk:ngmkaaa 4m3a:4m3aaaa ks_4:ks_466 3_sl:3_sl66 qcgg:qcgggg bbvf:bbvfgg sqqp:sqqppp lqqp:lqqppp qikk:qikkll k7mm:k7mm44 cpu_:cpu_44 xx_2:xx_244 5

👍1

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @DDDDDD5DD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,120,803 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“حسابات سكيور” (@DDDDDD5DD), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DDDDDD5DD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.