511担保入款请把交易规则看看 避免纠纷扯皮 一切交易以担保交易规则为准(务必查看清楚)
💩1,930👻68🤮60😢36😱32👎29🤬28🤔26

Channel
@DBPD_511
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,445subscribers
-125 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001900790738 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DBPD_511 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DBPD_511 |
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 11:17 | 1,445 | -8 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:21 | 1,453 | -19 |
| 24 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 1,472 | -17 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 1,489 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 1,496 | -9 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 1,505 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:14 | 1,512 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 1,518 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 1,529 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 1,541 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 1,550 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 1,555 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 1,559 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 1,569 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 1,570 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:49 | 1,570 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 23 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,777 reactions across 10 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 1,930 | 69.5% | |
| ❤ | 376 | 13.5% | |
| 👎 | 110 | 3.96% | |
| 👻 | 68 | 2.45% | |
| 🤮 | 60 | 2.16% | |
| 👍 | 56 | 2.02% | |
| 😢 | 36 | 1.30% | |
| ❤🔥 | 33 | 1.19% | |
| 😱 | 32 | 1.15% | |
| 🤬 | 28 | 1.01% | |
| 🤔 | 26 | 0.936% | |
| 🤯 | 14 | 0.504% | |
| 🎄 | 2 | 0.072% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.072% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 0.072% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.072% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,777 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2024 to 26 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
511担保入款请把交易规则看看 避免纠纷扯皮 一切交易以担保交易规则为准(务必查看清楚)
💩1,930👻68🤮60😢36😱32👎29🤬28🤔26
等待编辑
👎21❤6❤🔥4👍4
等待编辑
👎16❤5❤🔥3
等待编辑
👎17❤🔥5❤4
等待编辑
❤15👎8❤🔥1
等待编辑
👎16❤🔥6❤5
以下名单管理员名下担保 🥱 不在负责人赔付范围 由各个管理员进行赔付 负责人不做担保 谁担保谁负责😜 黑化昂 @Ang_788‹枫担保5w› 荷尔 @HE777_511 ‹枫担保5w› 小言 @xiaoyan_788 ‹枫担保5w› 小恐龙 @KLong666_511 ‹枫担保2w› 小默 @xiaomo_511 ‹枫担保2w› Hey @Hey44451_511 ‹枫担保2w› 皓天 @HaoTian_511 ‹枫担保2w› 马云 @MYun999 ‹枫担保5w› 柏言 @baiyan_511‹枫担保2w› 桥南 @K66s8_511 ‹枫担保2w› 人为 @FHXY120 ‹枫担保2w› 林风 @Linfeng_511‹枫担保2w› 咖啡 @KaKaFei7 ‹淡泊担保2w› 林帝 @TCYP0006 ‹淡泊担保2w› 杜甫 @DuFuge ‹正总担保6.5w› 陈晓 @FHXY066 ‹正总担保2w› 一哥 @YG888…
❤73👍10❤🔥2
楠楠 @nan222 ‹担保2w› 江川泽 @TCYP5200 ‹担保2w› 肆尘 @sichen999 ‹担保2w› 夏浅 @xiaqian6 ‹担保2w› 风追 @Fengzhui5800 ‹担保2w› 静 @JA15520 ‹担保2w› 两难 @ac911gg ‹担保2w› 阿爽 @AtssWash9988 ‹担保2w› 服务王 @FWW998 ‹担保2w› 丽桑卓 @BingNv888 ‹担保2w› 陈淑婷 @Chenst1688 ‹担保2w› KK @GLOBAL7788 ‹担保2w› 小脑袋 @liangnan886 ‹担保2w› 张无忌 @TCYP0007‹担保2w› 男童 @FHXY770‹担保2w› 大王 @dawang96666 ‹担保2w› 乾隆 @TCYP00010 ‹担保2w› 兔兔 @tutu770000 ‹担保2w› 远航 @Yhang5 ‹担保2w› 黑美人 @jing980 ‹担保2w› …
❤37👍9❤🔥3👎1
交易导航请点击这里😅 可联系负责人确认是否担保😅 请阅读交易流程规则后再交易😅 骚 @Asao_511 ‹负责人› 峰帝 @FDD_511 ‹负责人› 凌 @lingg ‹负责人› 正总 @Zheng_511 ‹管理员› 黑化枫 @XF778800_511 ‹管理员› 淡泊 @DanBo_511 ‹管理员› 菩提 @pt878788 ‹管理员› 叶子 @TCYP000110 ‹担保10.5w› 三流子 @SanLiuzi ‹担保10w› 赴约 @FY6666L ‹担保10w› 北妄 @Bw_511 ‹担保10w› 浪漫 @LM_3322 ‹担保10w› 许愿 @TCYP123 ‹担保10w› 帝宇 @Dy_511 ‹担保10w› 夕颜 @TCYP000888 ‹担保10w› 冬月 @xx2588888 ‹担保9w› 木叶 @My1199 ‹担保8w› 烦死啦 @TCYP12345 ‹担保8w› 无仙 @wux_511 ‹担保…
❤171👍24❤🔥2🎄2👎2
欢迎来到511交易公群进行交易: 交易前请先关注公群流程 1、交易前认准担保人员头衔和交易导航,确认是否是担保人员(谨防代码骗子)如无法自行确定是否为担保人员,搜索 @danbao511_bot 发送验证+用户名即可验证是否为担保人员,例:验证@lingg 即可出现信息,也可联系负责人进行身份核实,交易前务必需知与担保人员进行本次交易的相关规则以及汇率。担保人员(供方)也应当在交易前提前说明详细的交易规则,双方确认一致后开始进行交易。如不提前问清相关规则以及汇率导致后期出现纠纷,料方应当承担相应责任。由于每个入款渠道规则不一,担保人员表明自己入款渠道的相关规则后,料方无视规则并且继续进行交易默认代表同意。 ⚠️ 一切以聊天记录为准,需方(入款人)交易过程中务必保存好与担保方的聊天记录,一切规则以聊天记录为准,无聊天记录无法成立纠纷,个人简介、频道通知等不做为判定依据。 2、交易中必须尽可能的保存好双方的聊天记录以防后期发生任…
❤37👍9👏2👨💻2😁2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @DBPD_511. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@DBPD_511 named 77 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
27 more handles are in this same list but not shown individually here — capped at 50.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“511担保导航” (@DBPD_511), 1,445 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DBPD_511.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.