Photo, posted without a caption
Signed #E_fi

Channel
@DAVARE_ETEHADI
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001198151962 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DAVARE_ETEHADI |
| Description | یادگاری عفی رعیس گرگ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 13 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DAVARE_ETEHADI |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 5 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:39 | 5 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 September 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 October 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed #E_fi
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed #E_fi
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed #E_fi
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed #E_fi
Channel name was changed to «چنل تایدی داورا یادگاری عفی رعیس گرگ»
خب
Signed #erfan
حاج امیر شبح شورشی از دواری خط میخوره ب علت فیک بودن امضا #عرفان_رعیس_گرگ_داور_کل #ارشد_چنل_تاییدی_داورا
Signed Erfan
✅حاج امیر شبح شورشی🌺 ✅ داور اتحادی تایید شد همه چنل ها🌺 ✅ @Haj_Amir_davar ✅ چنل تایید داورا⁉️ @DAVARE_ETEHADI #امضاه #عرفان_رعیس_گرگ_ #داور_کل
Signed Erfan
بهار از دواری فعلا خط میخوره ب علت فیک بودن هویت امضا #عرفان_رعیس_گرگ_داور_کل #ارشد_چنل_تاییدی_داورا
Signed E_rfan
✅ایمان کورد🌺 ✅ داور اتحادی تایید شد همه چنل ها🌺 ✅ @iman_Kalashnikov ✅ چنل تایید داورا⁉️ @DAVARE_ETEHADI
Signed E_rfan
سلام به همگی خب من یه مدت اف بودم تازه ان زدم کاری داشتین درخدمتم کسانی ام ک رفیق بودن الان ایدیشون ندارم لطفا بیان پی #عرفان_رعیس_گرگ_داور_کل #ارشد_چنل_تاییدی_داورا ادمین واس عدالت پی واس عدالتت ادمین خاستی پی بگو کسانی ام ک میخوان داور بشن بامدرک کامل پی بیام #عزت_زیاد https://t.me/E_rfan_b1
Signed E_rfan
✅بهار اصکایپر🌺 ✅ داور اتحادی تایید شد همه چنل ها🌺 ✅ @Bahar_Skaiper✅ چنل تایید داورا⁉️ @DAVARE_ETEHADI
Signed E_rfan
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DAVARE_ETEHADI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@DAVARE_ETEHADI named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“چنل تایدی داورا یادگاری عفی رعیس گرگ” (@DAVARE_ETEHADI), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DAVARE_ETEHADI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.