
Channel
πππππ
@DAN7E_REMIXES
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
2,569subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 5 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001823543727 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DAN7E_REMIXES |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DAN7E_REMIXES |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 2,569 | -8 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 2,577 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 2,577 | -14 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 2,591 | +4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:47 | 2,587 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured β we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@unnv_myz Β· 31,711
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 43 here β alongside 42 others β read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπππππβ (@DAN7E_REMIXES), 2,569 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DAN7E_REMIXES.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.