Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 91 days, net -223. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,462–9,751 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 05:25
9,495
-4
3 Nov 2026, 20:30
9,499
-3
31 Oct 2026, 18:11
9,502
-1
28 Oct 2026, 14:01
9,503
-2
25 Oct 2026, 04:46
9,505
+5
22 Oct 2026, 02:56
9,500
-11
18 Oct 2026, 14:49
9,511
-6
15 Oct 2026, 14:56
9,517
-1
13 Oct 2026, 00:37
9,518
-8
6 Oct 2026, 05:40
9,526
-11
29 Sept 2026, 11:54
9,537
-3
19 Sept 2026, 17:18
9,540
-17
15 Sept 2026, 15:19
9,557
-41
12 Sept 2026, 07:41
9,598
-20
8 Sept 2026, 03:22
9,618
-13
2 Sept 2026, 23:38
9,631
-2
30 Aug 2026, 11:04
9,633
-13
27 Aug 2026, 17:43
9,646
-2
24 Aug 2026, 13:37
9,648
-10
20 Aug 2026, 22:28
9,658
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 14 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
36.3%
avg views ÷ 9,495 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,450
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.928%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
41 (14 April 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
72,420
Reactions total
672
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 22:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
213
Videos
19
Links
351
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,410 reactions across 41 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
1,279
53.1%
❤
557
23.1%
👍
251
10.4%
😁
186
7.72%
🔥
61
2.53%
🤔
13
0.539%
🤯
12
0.498%
👏
10
0.415%
😍
9
0.373%
😨
6
0.249%
🙏
6
0.249%
🗿
5
0.207%
😢
5
0.207%
🤝
3
0.124%
🙈
2
0.083%
🥰
2
0.083%
🙉
1
0.041%
🙊
1
0.041%
🤷♂
1
0.041%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,410 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 41 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DAILYDIGITALSKILLS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 April 2026 to 8 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (61.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
آیا اکانت ایرانیا بن میشه؟
نکته مهم اینه که Anthropic در این متن صراحتاً اعلام نکرده که تمام اکانتهای کاربران کشورهای غیرمجاز را بلافاصله مسدود یا حذف میکنه ؛ اعلام کرده استفاده از سرویسهایش در این مناطق مجاز نیست.
بنابراین میتونیم نتیجه بگیریم احتمالا این چیزا پیش میاد :
- مسدودسازی دسترسی: احتمال محدود شدن یا قطع دسترسی کاربرانی که از مناطق غیرمجاز متصل میشوند وجود دارد.
- ریسک مسدود شدن حساب: در صورت تشخیص ن…
طبق توضیحات جدید وبسایت رسمی کلاد (Anthropic):
تاریخ اجرا: ۱۲ نوامبر ۲۰۲۶
نوع اطلاعیه: تغییر در سیاست دسترسی (Policy)
مخاطبان: تمامی کاربران
بر اساس این سیاست، محصولات و خدمات Anthropic شامل Claude.ai، Claude Code، Cowork، API و مدلهای Claude که از طریق پلتفرمهای ابری و فروشندگان مجاز ارائه میشوند، تنها در کشورهای موجود در فهرست رسمی این شرکت قابل استفاده خواهند بود.
قلمروهای وابسته به کشورهای مجاز نیز پشتیبانی م…
🔴 قدم صفر؛ یه بار برای همیشه
اگر دقت کرده باشین آموزش های اخیر کانال یک رویه پایه رو طی کردن و راستش دیگه خسته شدم از اینکه توی هر آموزش پنل از اول بگم دامنه بخر، وصلش کن به کلادفلر، SSH بزن، SSL بگیر … 😅
نتیجهش این میشد که آموزشها طولانی میشدن و اونایی که بلد بودن باید کلی جلو میزدن.
💠 برای همین یه پلیلیست ساختم به اسم «قدم صفر» 👇
هرچی قبل از نصب یه پنل (یا راهاندازی یه سایت) لازم داری، به ترتیب و قدمبهقدم ه…
بعد از آتش بس و اتصال مجدد مثلا اینترنت بین الملل , یکی از چیزایی که خیلی برام عجیب بود و توجهم رو جلب کرد حجم زیاد اطلاعات غلطی بود که منتشر میشد !
به نظرم دادن اطلاعات غلط در آینده باعث رسوایی شما میشه ( مخصوصا که یوتوبر باشی ) گاهی اوقات نظر ندادن راجب چیزی که نمیدونید بیشتر به شما شخصیت میده تا ادای آدم این کاره رو درآوردن
یا مثلا اون عزیزی که حتی تلفظ درست کلمات انگلیسی رو بلد نیست و داره متود میفروشه کاملا مش…
چطور هک شدم؟
این موضوع برای الان نیست واسه سال ۹۵ ۹۶ هستش ، اون زمان ربات های نینجاگرام خیلی مد بود ، در واقع یه نرم افزاری بود که اینستاگرام/ تلگرام رو اسکرپ میکرد و برای تبلیغات توی گروه ها و پیج ها میشد ازش استفاده کرد( اگه درست خاطرم باشه ). توی اپ استور های اندرویدی داخلی سرچ کردم و بالاخره مشابه ایرانیش رو پیدا کردم ، بعد از نصب روی گوشیم ازم خواست نرم افزار مخصوصش رو روی ویندوز هم نصب کنم. زمان نصب یهو پیغام …
👑 اسکریپت VESSL آپدیت شد! 🔄
گرفتن گواهی SSL حالا سادهتر و هوشمندتر از همیشه است 👇
🚀 امکانات:
♾️ گواهی SSL تکدامنه، چنددامنه و Wildcard
🔹 داشبورد وضعیت سرور که IP، تعداد گواهیها و وضعیت پورت ۸۰ را یکجا نشان میدهد
🔹 تشخیص خودکار سرویسی که پورت ۸۰ را گرفته، مثل Nginx، Xray و پنلهای VPN
🔹 ۵ راهحل برای پورت ۸۰ اشغال، از توقف چندثانیهای سرویس و روشن کردن دوبارهاش تا استفاده از پورت ۴۴۳
🔹 تست قبل از دریافت گواهی: ش…
🎞 دریافت SSL برای همه سابدامنهها با یک اسکریپت !
⭐دیلی دیجیتال اسکیلز
👑تبلیغات
❤8👍6🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @DAILYDIGITALSKILLS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📜در ویدیوهای آموزشی بیشتر با کدوم حالت تصویر راحت تر هستین و برای خوندن متن و دیدن تصاویر چشمتون اذیت نمیشه؟
دارک مود راحت تر هستم - متن روشن در زمینه ی تاریک66%
لایت مود راحت تر هستم - متن تیره در زمینه ی روشن11%
هردو حالت راحت هستم15%
نظری ندارم8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
iAghapour | Digital Freedom 🎯 @iaghapour · 51,140 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 24 August 2026
Segaro @iSeqaro · 38,165 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 30 August 2026
Xray UI @XrayUI · 36,584 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 1 September 2026
Hiddify @hiddify · 118,949 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
Smart Skill @SmartSkill · 24,617 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 September 2026
Turboo Server @turboo_server · 28,595 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 7 September 2026
عصر نوین| AminiYT @asrnovin_ir · 162,209 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026
رادار وضعیت اینترنت @IRRadar · 28,014 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 September 2026
🚀 Ostad VPN | فیلترشکن پر سرعت @Vmess_store · 38,508 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 20 September 2026
13HACK @TMsizdah · 19,979 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 3 October 2026
چهارراه کامپیوتر @charrahecomputer · 36,086 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
Github_2dust @github_2dust · 92,859 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 17 August 2026
NextVPN | ازادی اینترنت @NextServer · 54,322 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 13 September 2026
تهران نت @tehrannet_official · 32,873 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 31 August 2026
فیلترشکن V2ray تست رایگان @Vpn_Red_P · 61,880 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 26 August 2026
Tenzo VPN | تنزو وی پی ان @TenzoVPN · 38,921 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 15 August 2026
Alaedin VPN 🧞♂ علاءالدین @AlaedinVPN · 153,342 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 15 August 2026
Avaal Service @AvaalVPN · 20,654 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 22 September 2026
IRCF | اینترنت آزاد برای همه @ircfspace · 97,073 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 16 August 2026
GlyNet • گلاینت @GlyNet · 25,909 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 14 September 2026
SkyShield VPN | اسکای شیلد @SkyShieldVPN · 26,235 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 11 September 2026
فیلترشکن نیم بها | Abc Cloud @Abc_Cloud · 164,879 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 27 August 2026
MahsaAlert @mahsa_alert · 31,707 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 4 September 2026
Cutout @xArshya · 36,024 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DDS (Daily Digital Skills)” (@DAILYDIGITALSKILLS), 9,495 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DAILYDIGITALSKILLS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.