Channel
@D4rkNews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,085subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001455341499 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @D4rkNews |
| Created | 25 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/D4rkNews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 1,085 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 1,086 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 1,089 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 1,089 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 December 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
52 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 51.9% | |
| 🤬 | 7 | 13.5% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 9.62% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 7.69% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 7.69% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 December 2021 to 20 December 2021, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👨🏻💻 Esto es lo que pasa cuándo intentas manipular la verdad en un directo pero la persona en cuestión es alguien consciente de que esto es una dictadura llamada "COVID19". Un héroe sin capa nuestro amigo anónimo. Para más información @D4rkNews
👍12😁4👏3❤1
👨🏻💻 «Una empresa sueca ha desarrollado un chip que se implanta bajo la piel y que guarda tu información de vacunación» Según argumentan la empresa: “Así es más fácil mostrar tu pasaporte COVID19". Para más información @D4rkNews
👎4👍1🖕1
👨🏻💻 Cada vez que oigo hablar a Miguel Bosé me cae mejor. Soltando frases como "Los únicos que se están llenando los bolsillos son los farmacéuticos", sublime. Para más información @D4rkNews
👍3
👨🏻💻 «Duro golpe para Macron: el 70% de los padres se niega a vacunar a sus hijos de 5 a 11 años» En Francia, casi el 70% de los padres rechazan categóricamente que sus hijos de 5 a 11 años sean vacunados. Malas noticias para Emmanuel Macron que desea ardientemente la vacunación de los franceses de este grupo de edad. 📌 Fuente: https://bit.ly/30HGiTa Para más información @D4rkNews
👍3
👨🏻💻 En la reunión de Davos del 2018, Albert Bourla, actual CEO de Pfizer, habla sobre microchips que emiten señales desde adentro del cuerpo. 📌 Traducción: @voluntasoficial Para más información @D4rkNews
🤬2🖕1
👨🏻💻 La psicóloga Lourdes Relloso nos cuenta como se destruye y debilita la psicología de un ser humano, simplemente magistral. PD: El libro del que habla es "The Manipulation of Human Behavior" de Albert D. Biderman. 📌 Web: LourdesRelloso.es Para más información @D4rkNews
👍2
🔥 ¿Alguien me recibe?
👨🏻💻 «Madrid se prepara para el gran apagón: "No queremos alarmar, pero la posibilidad existe"» El Gobierno de Ayuso insta al Ejecutivo central a activar los "mecanismos necesarios" por si se produce una "crisis de desabastecimiento. 📌 Fuente: https://bit.ly/3ysaMos Para más información @D4rkNews
👨🏻💻 «Google despedirá a los empleados que no se vacunen: es la primera gran tecnológica que toma una medida tan extrema contra el COVID19» Ha comunicado a sus empleados que aquellos que aún no estén inmunizados serán obligados a tomarse una licencia, que podrá durar hasta siete meses, y que si en ese tiempo no se administran la dosis que les corresponde, serán finalmente despedidos. 📌 Fuente: https://bit.ly/3yHLza…
🤬2
👨🏻💻 El prestigioso Dr. Peter McCullough en el show de Joe Rogan dice que Moderna hizo la vacuna COVID19 mucho antes del surgimiento de la pandemia, dice además que fue una maquinación coordinada por gobiernos y entidades médicas para forzar la vacunación como la solución. 📌 Traducción: Elmer Baunan Para más información @D4rkNews
👍1
👨🏻💻 Blackrock y Vanguard se embolsan miles de millones: La variante de Ómicron supone para los accionistas de Moderna y Pfizer más de 10.000 millones de dólares. PD: Recuerda no ser un mal pensado, gracias a ellos vivimos en un mundo más seguro y menos corrupto. 📌 Fuente: https://bit.ly/3ylt9eI 💉🚫 @STOPVacunaObligatoria
🤬1
👨🏻💻 Por estas declaraciones en La $ecta, Miguel Sebastián, político y exministro, fue denunciado por la asociación "Victimas de los politicos", la denuncia es por delito de odio por las declaraciones del vídeo. 📌 Fuente: https://bit.ly/3dLnkhh Para más información @D4rkNews
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @D4rkNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,037,941 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@D4rkNews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“D4rk News 📰” (@D4rkNews), 1,085 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/D4rkNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.