Cwallet News pinned a photo

Channel
Cwallet News
@CwalletNews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37,990subscribers
-116 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002328876411 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CwalletNews |
| Description | Unlock the Diverse Applications of Crypto in Web2.5 World. 🔗 https://cwallet.com 🤖 Bot: @cwallet_com_bot 🌍 Community: @Cwallet_Exchange 🛎️ Support: @cwallet_com_official |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CwalletNews |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 37,990 | -11 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 38,001 | -13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 38,014 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 38,029 | -20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 38,049 | -14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 38,063 | -31 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:26 | 38,094 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 38,106 | first reading |
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.17%
- avg views ÷ 37,990 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,210
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.506%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 30
- of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (23 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22,916 |
| Reactions total | 116 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 00:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 473
- Videos
- 4
- Links
- 465
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
116 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 65 | 56.0% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 13.8% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 12.1% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 8.62% | |
| 🎄 | 4 | 3.45% | |
| ☃ | 3 | 2.59% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.72% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.862% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.862% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 116reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚀 One Move. 1000x the Ride. This week's volatility? That's the setup. 1001X turns even the smallest market moves into massive swings — up to 1000x on a single call. Bigger thrill than perps, bigger upside on every move. No complex setup — just your read on the market and a multiplier ready to run. 👉 https://my.cwallet.com/trade/1001x Small move, big multiplier. 📈 ---- 🔗 Official Website | Help Center | Community …
❤3
Cwallet News pinned a photo
🟩⬛ Every Tap, A New Chance Every tile's a shot at doubling your win — trust your gut and go for it. No charts, no strategy, just instinct. and one tap could take you all the way. 👉 https://my.cwallet.com/trade/tap-trading Pick fast, pick smart. ⚡ ---- 🔗 Official Website | Help Center | Community | Blog | Learn 👛 Web Wallet | App Store | Google Play | Telegram Bot 📱Twitter | 📱Facebook | 📱 Ins | 📱 TikTok
👍3❤2🔥2
Cwallet News pinned a photo
📈 Trade the Trend, Not the Noise Not every signal's a green light. Knowing which is — that's the game. Momentum don't wait. Catch it or miss it. 👉 https://my.cwallet.com/trade/trend-trade Read it right, ride the wave. 🌊 ---- 🔗 Official Website | Help Center | Community | Blog | Learn 👛 Web Wallet | App Store | Google Play | Telegram Bot 📱Twitter | 📱Facebook | 📱 Ins | 📱 TikTok
❤6👍2
Cwallet News pinned a photo
🟢🔴 UP OR DOWN? Two traders. One asset. Opposite calls. No charts to study, no indicators to second-guess — just you, a rival, and a market that's about to move one way or the other. Read it right, and your PnL doubles on the spot. Read it wrong, and it's gone. 👉 https://my.cwallet.com/trade/market-battle 2x or bust. Your call. 🔥 ---- 🔗 Official Website | Help Center | Community | Blog | Learn 👛 Web Wallet | Ap…
❤6
🚀 Cwallet Weekly Listing Roundup (Aug 03 – Aug 07) Fresh assets, bigger opportunities! We’ve expanded our ecosystem with a brand-new lineup of tokens available this week. ✨ New Listings: • $EUL (ETH) 0xd9fcd98c322942075a5c3860693e9f4f03aae07b • $HFT (ETH) 0xb3999F658C0391d94A37f7FF328F3feC942BcADC • $QUID (BASE) 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53 • $XAI (ARETH) 0x4Cb9a7AE498CEDcBb5EAe9f25736aE7d428C9D66 • $…
❤8😁3
🐙 $QUID Launchpool is Officially Live! 🚀 Powering over $6B+ in volume across 100+ blockchains for more than 1M users since 2023, Squid is redefining how Web3 moves value. Now, its native token $QUID has arrived on Cwallet! To bring this battle-tested cross-chain powerhouse directly to our community, the $QUID Launchpool is now officially open! How to Participate: 🗓️ Duration: Aug 07 – Aug 21 💰 Total Rewards: 900 $…
❤2👍2👏1
Cwallet News pinned a photo
📚 Cwallet Academy — Lesson 03: Make Your Money Work Your crypto's out there hustling. Is your budget? 👀 Smarter saving, smarter risk-taking, smarter you — that's the vibe this lesson's going for. ✅ 20-Q quiz 🎁 200 Points, redeemable in the Rewards Mall for crypto rewards, gift cards & more — up to 50 USDT 🗓️ Aug 5 – Aug 11 UTC 👉 https://my.cwallet.com/quiz/7YItxZtP ⚠️ Only 600 spots, FCFS. KYC required. Terms a…
❤3🤩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @CwalletNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 656,212 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@CwalletNews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cwallet News” (@CwalletNews), 37,990 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CwalletNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.