Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Oficina Nacional de Estadística e Información de Cuba🇨🇺

Channel

Oficina Nacional de Estadística e Información de Cuba🇨🇺

@CubaONEI

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

883subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001210280760
TypeChannel
Username@CubaONEI
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CubaONEI

Growth

878883880.57 August 2026 — 878 subscribers8 August 2026 — 878 subscribers8 August 2026 — 879 subscribers15 August 2026 — 883 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 877–884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 18:54883+4
8 Aug 2026, 01:23879+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:06878no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:48878first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.2%
avg views ÷ 883 subscribers
Avg views / post
179
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.493%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (21 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,860
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
375.0%
👍125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC50 viewsread 8 August 2026

#Turismo | ✈️ Hasta el mes de junio, se recibieron 699 878 viajeros, que representa el 51,3 % respecto a igual período del 2025, lo que equivale a 664 522 viajeros menos. 🧳 Arribaron 387 591 visitantes internacionales hasta el mes de junio, que representa el 39,3 %, es decir, 598 015 visitantes internacionales menos que en el mismo período del año anterior. 📉 De ellos, la disminución más notoria se produjo por part

6 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC73 viewsread 8 August 2026

💬 Si te quedaste con alguna duda, déjala en los comentarios y con gusto te respondemos.#ONEI | 🤔 ¿Cómo puede la ONEI calcular la Población Efectiva de Cuba sin haber realizado un Censo de Población y Viviendas? Esta fue una de las dudas más recurrentes de nuestros usuarios cuando publicamos las cifras correspondientes al año 2025. Por eso, hoy te contamos, paso a paso, cómo se realiza este proceso. 🧮 Para calcular l

6 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC73 viewsread 8 August 2026

💬 Si te quedaste con alguna duda, déjala en los comentarios y con gusto te respondemos.

4 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC113 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#Demografía | 📊 Al cierre de 2025, la mortalidad infantil se ubicó en 9,9 por cada mil nacidos vivos, y hoy abordaremos el comportamiento de este indicador por provincias. 📈 La Habana (con 14,2) fue la provincia que presentó la mortalidad infantil más elevada, seguida por el Municipio Especial Isla de la Juventud (12,9) y Camagüey (12,4). 📉 Las provincias con mortalidad infantil más baja fueron Pinar del Río (4,7),

1

31 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC197 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#ONEI | 🤔 ¿Estuviste al pendiente de nuestro sitio web este mes? Si no fue así, hoy te traemos un resumen de todo lo que publicamos en julio. 📌 Pusimos a tu disposición publicaciones mensuales habituales como nuestro boletín de economía, DUINE, IPC y el boletín "Precios Mínimos y Máximos de Variedades Seleccionadas por Territorios". 👥️️ Además, dimos a conocer la población ️efectiva de Cuba para el año 2025 y otros

29 Jul 2026, 20:13 UTC184 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#Precios | 💰 ¿Cuánto costaba el litro de aceite envasado en cada cabecera provincial de Cuba durante el mes de junio de 2026? Descúbrelo en nuestro post de hoy, donde abordaremos los precios mínimos y máximos de este producto. 📉 El precio mínimo registrado del aceite envasado fue de 1300 pesos cubanos en Cienfuegos, seguido por 1350 pesos en Artemisa y 1400 pesos en Pinar del Río, Villa Clara y Santiago de Cuba. 📈

29 Jul 2026, 20:11 UTC156 viewsread 8 August 2026

👉 Ya disponible “Precios Mínimos y Máximos de Variedades Seleccionadas por Territorios, junio, 2026”.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @CubaONEI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 643,948 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Oficina Nacional de Estadística e Información de Cuba🇨🇺” (@CubaONEI), 883 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CubaONEI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.