Channel photo removed
Channel
Cthulhu Apesπ
@CthulhuApes
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
18subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002390348024 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CthulhuApes |
| Created | 11 September 2024 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CthulhuApes |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 18 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 21 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 30 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:39 | 30 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 11 September 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 54s
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
457 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯° | 170 | 37.2% | |
| β€ | 135 | 29.5% | |
| π₯ | 83 | 18.2% | |
| π | 54 | 11.8% | |
| π | 7 | 1.53% | |
| π€© | 3 | 0.656% | |
| π€¬ | 3 | 0.656% | |
| π | 2 | 0.438% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 457reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2024 to 14 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ππ
Gambled on $CORN https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x6220add83b8103bffe40218e658068288eda4ec1 Website: https://corntoken.wtf TG: https://t.me/CornTokenETH Twitter: https://x.com/corn_token dyor, 3mln$ mcap
β€17π₯°10π7π₯5
Esquid Buy! πͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺπͺ π Spent $236.16 (0.1 ETH) π Got 27,884 QUID π€ Buyer / TX πͺ New Holder π· Price $0.00853 πΈ Market Cap $126,189 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending
π₯°23β€9π₯8π3
AI is the strongest narrative that will have the highest returns on investment π«‘π
π₯°20β€8π3π₯3
Ape $ModAI ~70k https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xe808fc8c575a72bbdee58644b3b4b5acc58121d3 Locked 90 days, renounced, tax 5/5 t.me/ICU_portal
π₯°11π₯7β€6π3π1
π₯ Prelaunch Call π₯ An interesting memecoin on ERC20 will soon be launched, the exact time will be announced in the telegram group. Branding very interesting, $BTC narrative is always good! βDON'T BE A REAL $NOB. STAY AWAKE AND CATCH THE #BTC SURGE TO $1,000,000! β For holders, a drop is expected with every $5k change in the price of $BTC, this is done automatically through a special contract, cool. Follow the Proβ¦
π₯°10β€8π₯6π3π2
$NEBULA 8X π€
π₯°17β€7π₯5π2π€©2
Low mcap $NEBULA - 50k$ https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x2e2da477f42ed2fca40bf8c6dafd066771e9fa40 Seamless and customizable multi-chain trading at your fingertips. https://www.nebulatrading.net https://t.me/nebula_portal https://www.x.com/Nebula_Trading DYOR !
π₯°18β€16π5π₯5
Check out our latest video to see Esquid in action!
π₯°11β€9π5π₯3π€©1
Seems like its bottom around 2 mil area. I know that many kols are in for the culture. Cant really see it dipping more. Taking the risk here on this entry. NFA/DYOR CA: 0xc0cfbe1602dd586349f60e4681bf4badca584ec9 Tax: 0/0 https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xfa01ce5bd8500d037c13ec7901d1f4b1f2174884?t=1726044654970 Tg: https://t.me/etheismcommunitychat
π₯°11β€8π₯8π5π2
π
π₯°17β€12π6π₯5π€¬3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @CthulhuApes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@CthulhuApes named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 β 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 β 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βCthulhu Apesπβ (@CthulhuApes), 18 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CthulhuApes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.