Channel
@Cryptto_Paradise
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,681subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002242480052 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cryptto_Paradise |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cryptto_Paradise |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 1,681 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 1,688 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 1,688 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 27.4% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 19.4% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 16.1% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 8.06% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 6.45% | |
| 😎 | 3 | 4.84% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 3.23% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.61% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 1.61% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.61% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.61% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2025 to 21 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Cryptto_Paradise. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 January 2025 to 21 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🟢Семейная криптодрама на $170 млн Женщина получила доступ к кошельку мужа, подсмотрев seed-фразу через камеры видеонаблюдения в доме. 🪙После этого с адреса вывели 2 323 BTC (~$170 млн) и распределили по 71 адресу — средства не перемещаются с конца 2023 года. При этом супруги тайно записывали друг друга: один — чтобы доказать кражу, другая — чтобы ее совершить. Дело остается в стадии расследования.
😱2
🟢Израиль полностью контролирует Биткоин — в файлах Эпштейна утверждается что BTC могла попасть под чужое влияние ещё больше 10 лет назад. Согласно докам, Израиль якобы профинансировал до 60% ведущих разработчиков биткоина, влиял на ключевые решения и был связан с Blockstream — компанией, которая работает с Tether и имеет серьёзное влияние на экосистему крипты. Самое страшное: если верить этим утверждениям, через ко…
❤1😱1
Подписывайтесь на наш канал🔚 С нами будет интересно🚨 ➡️ https://t.me/pechatnik_3day 🔥Всем привет!Это ваш проводник в мир 3D-печати.👋 💡Здесь мы показываем как рождаются крутые штуки — от идеи до физического объекта в руках. Без воды, только суть: ⏺Процесс: Гифки и таймлапсы печати, чтобы вы видели, как это работает. ⏺Детали: Макро-фото, чтобы оценить каждую линию. ⏺Идеи: Наши работы и ваши будущие заказы. 💫Хотите …
🔥2❤1
Posted without readable text
🐻Крипторынок потерял $812.13 млн ликвидаций, а фондовый в США — рухнул на более 1 трлн☹️
🤯1😁1
⬇️Крипта резко катится вниз — Bitcoin упал уже до $91,000☹️ — Всего за 4 часа на крипторынке ликвидировано $240 млн в лонгах, а за сутки — более $800 млн; — Эфир уже ниже $3000; — TON упал до $1,75 — это уровень сентября 2023 года. Монета потеряла более 63% стоимости за год.
🤯1😱1
➡️Из 7 млн мем-токенов, запущенных на Pump Fun, более 98% оказались скамом, рагпулом или pump&dump махинациями. #news #cryptoparadise
🤣2❤1
✅Криптовалюта Трампа резко подорожала на фоне новостей об успешности переговоров.
🔥2❤1
👀 Тут интересный токен нарисовался, с музыкальным авторским нарративом. 🕯Создатель пишет электронную музыку 🕺 пока плавает на мемпаде Blum. Залетайте на копеечку, читайте посты, перспективы есть ! Не фин. Рекомендация 💱 Подробности в канале Voscache/ VMG 🤑
👍3❤2🔥1
Как вам задумка?💡
❤2🔥2👍1
Сооснователь криптоигры Blum АРЕСТОВАН — Владимира Смеркиса обвиняют в мошенничестве и уже заключили под стражу. Команда проекта поспешила откреститься от бывшего директора по маркетингу. Blum — ещё одна криптоигра, где пользователи зарабатывают очки, которые обещают обменять на криптовалюту. Юзеры ждут релиз монеты уже год, но дата раздачи так и не была объявлена. Как раз к листингу выйдет. 😁
🤣3❤1👌1😨1
💡 Советы на сегодня ✅ Для консервативных инвесторов: - Докупать BTC и ETH на уровнях $60K и $3,1K. - Рассмотреть TON и SOL как высокопотенциальные альткоины. ✅ Для агрессивных трейдеров: - Искать вход в AI-токены (FET, RNDR). - Мониторить новые RWA-проекты (ONDO, MKR). ❌ Избегать: - Мемкоины с высокой волатильностью (если нет готовности к риску). - Проекты с низкой ликвидностью.
😎3❤1🤨1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Cryptto_Paradise. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌴CRYPTO PARADISE🌴💵” (@Cryptto_Paradise), 1,681 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cryptto_Paradise.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.