Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 6 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 39 days, net -634. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,664–9,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Oct 2026, 22:29
8,759
-48
22 Oct 2026, 17:29
8,807
-49
19 Oct 2026, 16:47
8,856
-32
16 Oct 2026, 11:19
8,888
-55
13 Oct 2026, 02:56
8,943
-82
6 Oct 2026, 21:16
9,025
-133
29 Sept 2026, 16:35
9,158
-217
19 Sept 2026, 02:00
9,375
-18
16 Sept 2026, 20:22
9,393
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 12 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
49 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
30
61.2%
👍
7
14.3%
🔥
4
8.16%
💘
3
6.12%
🎉
2
4.08%
👌
2
4.08%
💋
1
2.04%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨FOMC NEWS AT 11:30 PM
I’m expecting a 25 BPS rate hike.
Expect heavy volatility around the announcement …. markets can move sharply in both directions and shake out traders on both sides. ⚠️
A rate hike can put pressure on BTC, Gold & Silver, as higher rates can reduce the attractiveness of risk assets and shift capital toward safer/yield-bearing assets.
So stay careful, avoid over-leverage, and don’t chase rand…
CLARITY ACT UPDATE
The Senate just failed to move the CLARITY Act forward.
The vote was 49-50, while 60 votes were needed.
But important: this was NOT a final vote on the CLARITY Act. It was just a procedural vote to move the bill forward.
The main issue was around crypto ethics rules for government officials, especially Trump’s crypto interests.
The bill is still alive, but for now, CLARITY is stuck.
And with …
If the CLARITY Act doesn’t pass today, the market will dump.
Same with the FOMC. Everyone is expecting a rate hike tomorrow, so the general expectation of everyone is that $BTC will dump even more.
But in my opinion, the market has already priced in these expectations. That’s why BTC is dumping BEFORE the actual news.
By the time the news comes and gives the crowd a reason to sell, they might already be selling in…
Today could be one of the biggest days for the entire crypto market. 👆
At 11:45 PM IST, the US Senate will vote on the CLARITY Act.
I have explained everything about the vote and its possible impact above.
Let’s see what happens tonight.
➡️One more Smart Trader is Ready to Start a Profitable journey with us for one year ❤️🚀
Members are choosing the Best, What are you waiting for..?
Check VIP plans here⚡️
Your all loss recovery is just one step away 👇
Contact @cryptorian_bull✅
Scroll Up And give 2-3 minutes to Check Our Work and pinned messages, Many new members are Joining our VIP😊🚀
Stop Thinking, Join Today And cover your fees in 1 Day only 😌
A small fee is far better than continues huge losses🙌🏻
🗣Contact @cryptorian_bull and join now👍🏻
#GRIFFAIN/USDT played perfect in our VIP CLUB…. Almost 15%+ Dumped from our entry (150%+ profits with just 10x lev.)🤑🚀
Check the before after of Chart setups✅
We share proper charts to our VIPs so they can learn too🙌
Is there anyone who show proper charts setups or just showing Fake profits cards😂
Join VIP and trade like a pro
Contact @Cryptorian_Bull✅
#BTC Update — 1H TF :
#Bitcoin is finally breaking the recent structure after days of sideways movement.🧑💻
Price is currently holding around $77.7K–$77.9K, and this level is important now. If BTC manages to hold above the current zone, I’m expecting further upside.✅🚀
First we can see a move toward $78.8K–$79.2K, and if that zone gets reclaimed, $80.5K+ can come into play. 🚀
For now, I'm bullish as long as current…
GM BUlls❤️
Less members and subscribers not always mean Scam
or something like that🙂
Knowledge and experience matters to survive in this market, and Subscribers and High premium rates can't define experience and knowledge🤌
Join us and Make Profits with our experienced team
Contact @CRYPTORIAN_BULL✅
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CryptorianBullOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2026 to 16 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
SYN Trade™ @SYN_Trade · 18,670 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 30 September 2026
CRYPTO RK™️ @CryptoRKsignals · 98,344 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTORIAN ₿ULL (Free Crypto Trading Signals)” (@CryptorianBullOfficial), 8,759 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptorianBullOfficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.