Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 34 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 15:37
25
-1
15 Aug 2026, 20:43
26
-1
11 Aug 2026, 07:15
27
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:56
27
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
79 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
31
39.2%
🔥
22
27.8%
❤
8
10.1%
🥰
6
7.59%
😁
4
5.06%
custom 5350697882586455208
2
2.53%
🗿
2
2.53%
custom 5422425498582001113
1
1.27%
💔
1
1.27%
😍
1
1.27%
😘
1
1.27%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2024 to 19 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Эксклюзив!!
Наш корреспондент поговорил с основателем проекта 1INCH Антоном Буковым. Коротко:
• в текущем цикле нет одного модного хайпового нарратива. За это звание пытается хвататься сектор RWA, но вливания больших сумм туда пока не наблюдается
• в DeFi есть деньги и доходности, но все равно сектор в зачаточном состоянии и мало кто умеет переносить ценность (value accrual) в токены
• не стесняйтесь использовать AI…
Зомби-портфель 🧟
Очень многие спрашивают: а что делать с позицией, которая укаталась в минус 90% и которую уже не хочешь усреднять, потому что не видишь потенциала в монете? Продавать?
Чисто психологически это очень понятно - мол ну чего она висит и красным цветом глаза мозолит, лучше продам и куплю себе шаурму у метро. Так думает среднестатистический тревожный пирожок.
Но. Мы же все с вами неглупые и осторожные п…
Ну как вы? Ждете альтсезона? Мы в нашей редакции настроены умеренно-оптимистично
С одной стороны, много что в нашем портфеле укаталось в сосиску, но никто и не обещал легкой прогулки в парке! Мы в крипто-рынке с 2022 года и за это время стало понятно:
• технический анализ — опиум для народа. В мире высоко-частотного трейдинга конкурируют маркет-мейкеры с дорогущим, постоянно развивающимся софтом, зарабатывая при эт…
Шок-контент!
Вы не просили, но мы сделали!
Крипто-пирожочек теперь выходит на русском языке! Нравится? Накидайте реакций:
🔥 - пилите больше контента на русском!
👎 - bring back da English version!
Holdlers Gonna Hodl
In case you're worried about Moonpie's portfolio - rest assured, we're safe, alive and kicking!
If there's one most important thing markets taught us is that patience is king. Patience is our best friend and comrade.
That's why we keep our bags tight, don't sell anything and recently increased our stake in the following tokens:
- TWT (luckily right before the recent green candle)
- TON
- APT
-…
Still Bullish
Hi y’all tasty little lemon drops! Long time – no see, huh?
Crypto Moonpie have been silent for quite a while, but we are still bullish, we keep our portfolio tight and we haven’t sold any of the assets since our last update.
While the markets show no considerable movement so far, we notice ongoing developments in the crypto world that are quite promising in terms of further mass adoption of Web3:
-…
Scroll (SCR)*
EVM-compatible zk-Rollup with a strong proving network
Ticker: SCR
Sector: Layer-2 blockchain
Market Cap: $156 million
Current price: $0.82
Applicability: ensures fast scalability for Ethereum
Investors: Polychain Capital, Bain Capital Ventures, Variant
(note that Polychain invested $50m at the pre-valuation of $ 1.8 billion, while current market cap is $156 only – way to go folks!)
Amount invested: $83…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Cryptomoonpie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2024 to 19 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крипто-Пирожочек” (@Cryptomoonpie), 25 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cryptomoonpie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.