Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CryptoHub

Channel

CryptoHub

@CryptohubDesk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

2,230subscribers

-145 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003062494002
TypeChannel
Username@CryptohubDesk
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptohubDesk

Growth

2,2302,3752,302.57 August 2026 — 2,375 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,375 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,330 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,310 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,286 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,279 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,258 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,239 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,230 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,208–2,397 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 06:472,230-9
27 Aug 2026, 05:422,239-19
24 Aug 2026, 06:122,258-21
20 Aug 2026, 11:242,279-7
17 Aug 2026, 21:152,286-24
14 Aug 2026, 21:252,310-20
11 Aug 2026, 02:112,330-45
7 Aug 2026, 20:172,375no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:062,375first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 38s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

100 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6161.0%
🔥2121.0%
👍1414.0%
🥰33.00%
😁11.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2026 to 4 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 May 2026, 03:11 UTC37 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin hits $80K Everyone: “I knew it 😎” Also everyone 2 days ago: “waiting for 60K” Crypto memory = 24 hours 😄

1

4 May 2026, 02:51 UTC31 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

GameStop: “we sell games” Also GameStop: let’s buy eBay for $56 BILLION 😄 Market: *nods seriously* 2026 logic unlocked

1

30 Apr 2026, 07:03 UTC282 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Crypto today: “Web3 freedom, decentralization, financial revolution 🚀” Also crypto: 276 people arrested for running fake crypto investments across multiple countries 😄 Pig butchering scams: - slow emotional manipulation - fake profits - stolen funds So yeah… same space, different timelines.

🔥63

30 Apr 2026, 05:23 UTC446 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Powell be like: Inflation: still here Energy: also still here Geopolitics: don’t ask Policy: “we are fine 👍” Markets: pretends to be surprised later 😄 So yeah… totally controlled situation

2🔥2😁1

30 Apr 2026, 03:23 UTC414 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Pre-FOMC sentiment snapshot: Major inflow of bullish expectations: - BTC targets clustered: 80K–88K - ETH upside narrative: up to $10K - renewed altseason positioning across influencers - majority bias: continuation of bull cycle Notable exception: - some macro bearish scenarios still exist (85K rejection / broader downtrend view) What matters: - positioning is becoming crowded on upside - narrative compression ar

4👍1

29 Apr 2026, 18:29 UTC390 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Rates unchanged… shocker 😄 Previous 3.75% Forecast 3.75% Actual 3.75% Markets nailed it again Now we wait for Jerome Powell in few minutes maybe he adds some plot twist or at least better dialogue

4

29 Apr 2026, 10:51 UTC368 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

FOMC meeting drops today at 18:00 UTC. Jerome Powell is back on stage, but the script seems predictable. According to Polymarket, there’s a 99% chance of “no change.” Yeah… markets already spoiled the ending. Rates? Still stuck at 3.50%–3.75%. Crypto traders, however, didn’t wait for the show — they pulled out $40B in liquidity, sending the market down over 2.5%. Classic: “Nothing will happen” → everything react

2

29 Apr 2026, 08:56 UTC371 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Claude got full API control over PacketOS… and chose chaos mode “Let’s rewrite everything” deletes the entire project including backups, payments, clients… all gone Developers: we trusted you Claude: you said full control 😄 Rise of the machines just dropped

3

29 Apr 2026, 08:47 UTC356 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

“I won’t play the nice guy anymore” Donald Trump on Truth Social just switched to hard mode “Iran can’t get it together… they better get smart fast” Diplomacy level from friendly chat to boss fight real quick 😄

1

8 Apr 2026, 11:50 UTC763 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The Dust Storm: Taproot Adoption Isn't What We Expected 📉 Fresh data shows a weird trend: 99% of Taproot activity is classified as "dust." These are ultra-small transfers that don't serve any real economic goal. While the upgrade was designed for efficiency and privacy, the reality in 2026 is that it's being mass-misused. The network is busy, but the actual value being moved via Taproot is negligible.

8👍4

8 Apr 2026, 08:32 UTC782 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin Solo Miner Defies 1-in-28,000 Odds A solo miner running a modest setup just validated block #943,411. The reward, including fees, totaled approximately 3.14 BTC, worth over $210,000 at the time of discovery. Despite having only a 0.00002% share of the global hashrate, this individual managed to beat the giants.

5👍4🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptohubDesk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoHub” (@CryptohubDesk), 2,230 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptohubDesk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.