Channel
@Cryptogemsgurucalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,106subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001541372298 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cryptogemsgurucalls |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cryptogemsgurucalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 1,106 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 1,107 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 1,110 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 1,110 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Guys! @Jeetjail Just #launched on #SOL chain 📈 Team told that they has +500 SOL to push this one & Previous project did +10X ! Don't wait 👀 🛒:https://dexscreener.com/solana/6dodrlra1g86kvqsvvdxr9jqkpesdsbrtcd2ndrryk2h 💬:https://t.me/jeetjail
Check this out 😍 Nura labs sending really good. The presalers are up nice. Team last project was GG too. We aped max wallets so just hodl and chill. https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x399f600c9667ee748d31821b2df0c004b3432dc9
Congratulations to @Brickken for ranking #28 in @Siftedeu’s Top 100 Startups for France & Southern Europe👏 The only RWA tokenization platform featured, backed by strong growth and innovation. Proud to support a project shaping the future of fintech in Europe 🚀 Strong uptrend from $0.15 to $0.35 shows bullish momentum. Healthy consolidation above $0.25 with higher lows suggests potential for a new breakout 📈
Oh wow, the wait is finally over! 🚀 Huge congrats to the SoarFun.com team on this massive launch - what an incredible project. 🙌 Big things ahead & I’m happy to support and promote this new wave in Web3 😍
Nova is giving away 1,000 headphones - free. Yep, 1,000 pairs of the limited-edition Nova XA Ultra Headphones (RRP $129) are up for grabs 😍 These Bluetooth ANC headphones are built for crisp, high-fidelity sound.Exclusively for Mini Round participants. It is live now 🥳 First come, first served — don’t miss out. Details:https://novaxva.com/novaxagiveaway/ #NovaGiveaway #FreeTech
Proud to support @Brickken & the groundbreaking EIP-7493 uRWA standard by co-founder of $BKN & senior #OpenZeppelin researcher #xaler2 - a huge leap for RWA tokenization. uRWA sets the foundation for compliant, modular, scalable on-chain assets across DeFi. The future of tokenization is here! 🚀
Always happy to support projects like @Brickken. Awesome to see them team up with @ClearpoolFin to push real innovation in the RWA space. Big step for bridging TradFi and DeFi. They’re the real deal when it comes to building practical, scalable solutions in tokenization. This partnership is a huge move for institutional DeFi. Excited to be part of the journey 😍
I’ve been holding @Brickken since day one, & my conviction is stronger than ever. This project is gearing up for something massive 😍 From a 5-person founding team to 30+ professionals, they’ve built a powerhouse in RWA tokenization: $300M+ in assets, 100+ clients worldwide, & growing fast. Multi-chain, enterprise-grade, backed by Chainlink & PwC. This is the future of finance 🔥
Something’s brewing with @hyperskidstoken 👀 Community’s growing fast, volume’s pumping, & the whole #GiveFi movement is gaining real traction. Feels like it’s just getting started. Might be the perfect time to jump in 😍 🛒:https://www.mexc.com/exchange/HYPERSKIDS_USDT 💬:https://t.me/HYPERSKIDSTOKENOFICIAL
$Moonkin aped here on this og one. Straight narrative to 100M. LFGGG Make eth great again Vitalik pfp + bull posting $Moonkin 📈:https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x64bb1db38086ed11296ca104f64acb4fe491c441
$Lofi is running hard. 📈 0xf22da9a24ad027cccb5f2d496cbe91de953d363513db08a3a734d361c7c17503::LOFI::LOFI
$HKA just listed on MEXC. Big names backing it (Akon, 0g Labs), real Web3 impact in LATAM, more listings coming. Strong team, huge potential. This dip looks like a great chance - I'm adding more. 100x vibes 😍 @HypersKidsToken
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Cryptogemsgurucalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 354,128 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Cryptogemsgurucalls named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cryptogemsguru Calls” (@Cryptogemsgurucalls), 1,106 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cryptogemsgurucalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.