The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
ᴄʀʏᴘᴛᴏ ᴘᴜᴍᴘ ꜱɪɢɴᴀʟꜱ ®️
@Crypto_pump_Binance_no1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001728510765 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Crypto_pump_Binance_no1 |
| Description | 😎 Just because you fail once doesn’t mean you are gonna fail at everything 🇮🇳 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 5 September 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Crypto_pump_Binance_no1 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 10 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 10 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 September 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 69
- Links
- 11
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2022 to 6 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ᴄʀʏᴘᴛᴏ ᴘᴜᴍᴘ ꜱɪɢɴᴀʟꜱ ®️ pinned a photo
❇️ #BTC UPDATE #Bitcoin faced the ascending resistance, that correlates with the $27,500 - $28,000 level ☑️ 👋 We may see a small correction from current levels to the $26,000 - $26,300 support zone. Which is good for a healthy growth. No point in selling here ☑️ The best case we can find here: Bitcoin makes a small dump to support and consolidates there. This move will give a BIG CHANCE for altcoins to make truly …
ᴄʀʏᴘᴛᴏ ᴘᴜᴍᴘ ꜱɪɢɴᴀʟꜱ ®️ pinned a photo
❇️ #ETH UPDATE ❤️🔥 #Ethereum has approached a strong resistance $1760 that one was trying to break for multiple times before 👋 This breakout (if it happens) will not be fake as one before since there is a descending resistance that correlates with the horizontal one. 👁🗨 If Ethereum manages to break this level, the real party will start ☑️ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ᴄʀʏᴘᴛᴏ ᴘᴜᴍᴘ ꜱɪɢɴᴀʟꜱ ®️ pinned a photo
❇️ #BTC has already gained more than 11% in the month of March. The question is will the rally continue and if we will see the price reaching $28K. With the coming of #CPI data, we saw 🌐 #BTC price reaching high of $26386 (at the time of writing). Currently, the price is above 21-EMA and 50-EMA on a daily as well as 2- hourly timeframe. 👋 The next target price is $28300 with stop loss at 21-EMA ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ᴄʀʏᴘᴛᴏ ᴘᴜᴍᴘ ꜱɪɢɴᴀʟꜱ ®️ pinned a photo
🔰 Well,its actually a Cup and Handle pattern with yellow FLUTE as the neckline, awaiting the breakout/reversal. (in comment) 🌐 AFter drawing the yellow zone, the price action to the left looked like a head and the yellow zone looked like a flute.So went ahead and drew the rest of Krishna ~ D ❤️🔥 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
#Bitcoin aggresively pumping and continuously breaking all resistance areas as #USDC recovered and market flew. Currently, price is up till major resistance zone $24,450 - $24,880, where price is taking reaction a bit. If #BTC flips the level, then can see a move till all the way up around 👁 $28,500 and higher ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
❇️ FTX/Alameda collapse could be the last phase of bear market and it will make the generational bottom. The crash in NOVEMBER of which I was talking from last 3-4 months looks like incoming. That's why we were patient from last few days and didn't fomo, and shorted #BTC, #ETH & #BNB at near local top. Looking to short some alts as well on confirmation. 👁🗨 Also be ready to buy the generational bottom in November/De…
ᴄʀʏᴘᴛᴏ ᴘᴜᴍᴘ ꜱɪɢɴᴀʟꜱ ®️ pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Crypto_pump_Binance_no1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 971,559 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴄʀʏᴘᴛᴏ ᴘᴜᴍᴘ ꜱɪɢɴᴀʟꜱ ®️” (@Crypto_pump_Binance_no1), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_pump_Binance_no1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.