Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗖π—₯𝗬𝗣𝗧𝗒 π—©π—”π—¨π—Ÿπ—§ | KOLS

Channel

𝗖π—₯𝗬𝗣𝗧𝗒 π—©π—”π—¨π—Ÿπ—§ | KOLS

@Crypto_VaultNews

On this record: Topic Β· Observations Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

45,368subscribers

-2,468 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001776038923
TypeChannel
Username@Crypto_VaultNews
Description100+ Kols post | Advertisement | Airdrop | Giveaway | Partner : KuCoin, Gate.io, MEXC,LitBit, OKX ANN : https://t.me/Crypto_VaultChat Twitter : https://x.com/CryptoVaultTeam ☎️ For Business Proposal: @Anthonykols
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Crypto_VaultNews

Topic

Crypto & trading β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

28,800 average views per post against 46,010 subscribers β€” an engagement rate of 62.5%. Across the 3,503 registered channels in the same cohort β€” 31,629–99,976 subscribers, posting mainly in English β€” the middle half sit between 1.78% and 11.2%, with a median of 5.00%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured9 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled258,990
Mature posts only68.0% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers46,010 measured 4 November 2026
Cohortb31623:eng Β· 3,503 channels Β· p10 0.479% Β· p25 1.78% Β· p50 5.00% Β· p75 11.2% Β· p90 20.2%
Position in cohort99.457th percentile Β· 12.5Γ— the cohort median
UncertaintyΒ±0.03% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish Β· 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3Γ— away from that cohort’s median β€” above it β€” on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes β€” audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through β€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

45,36857,70651,5378 August 202612 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 97 days, net -2,468. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,517–59,557 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 21:4645,368-123
10 Nov 2026, 18:4645,491-120
9 Nov 2026, 07:4645,611-106
7 Nov 2026, 20:4745,717-116
6 Nov 2026, 15:1545,833-110
5 Nov 2026, 13:2645,943-67
4 Nov 2026, 14:5446,010-155
3 Nov 2026, 13:4646,165-145
2 Nov 2026, 13:0646,310-227
1 Nov 2026, 12:0646,537-348
31 Oct 2026, 08:3446,885-271
30 Oct 2026, 06:0847,156-308
29 Oct 2026, 05:5747,464-546
28 Oct 2026, 01:1748,010-560
26 Oct 2026, 22:4648,570-299
25 Oct 2026, 20:0048,869-263
24 Oct 2026, 19:0849,132-291
23 Oct 2026, 17:1649,423-178
22 Oct 2026, 13:5949,601-177
21 Oct 2026, 07:3549,778first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 12 May 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
59.3%
avg views Γ· 45,368 subscribers
Avg views / post
26,900
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.791%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held73 (12 May 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total188,200
Reactions total1,488
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 12:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
620
Videos
88
Links
834

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 21s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

4,137 reactions across 26 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀61414.8%
πŸ‘61414.8%
πŸŽ‰59614.4%
πŸ₯°59614.4%
πŸ”₯59014.3%
😍57313.9%
❀‍πŸ”₯55413.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 4,137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own β€˜edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 11:17 UTCviews β€”

𝗖π—₯𝗬𝗣𝗧𝗒 π—©π—”π—¨π—Ÿπ—§ | KOLS pinned a video

4 Nov 2026, 11:16 UTCβ‰ˆ8,780 views200 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

♠️ WIN REAL USDT EVERY DAY. Free poker on Telegram. No deposit, ever. πŸ’° $5 daily Β· πŸ† $50 every Saturday Β· πŸ‘‘ Monthly league Play now: https://t.me/PokerOnlineBot 18+ Β· Terms in the app

❀63πŸŽ‰52πŸ‘43πŸ”₯42

Signed MICHAEL | π‘Ίπ’–π’π’“π’Šπ’”π’† 𝑽𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 π‘ͺπ’‚π’‘π’Šπ’•π’‚π’

29 Oct 2026, 02:38 UTCviews β€”

𝗖π—₯𝗬𝗣𝗧𝗒 π—©π—”π—¨π—Ÿπ—§ | KOLS pinned a photo

29 Oct 2026, 02:38 UTCβ‰ˆ14,900 views204 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🚨🐸 MEME COIN DEGENS β€” PROVE IT! πŸš€ πŸ† $500 DEGEN FUTURES COMP πŸ₯‡ $250 | πŸ₯ˆ $150 | πŸ₯‰ $100 πŸ“ˆ Top 3 futures trading volumes win! πŸ”₯ 7-day trading window starts at signup. πŸ’Έ ZERO withdrawal fees πŸ“‰ Ultra-low trading fees ⚑ Fast trading πŸš€ Optional KYC πŸ”₯ ENTRY IS AUTOMATIC! πŸ’΅ Deposit from $5usdt ⏰ Register by Nov 7th 2026 πŸ‘‰ kcex.com/register?inviteCode=HT47F3 πŸ“’ Results Posted Nov 15th here t.me/DegenTradersSociety ⚠️ πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ …

πŸŽ‰40πŸ₯°37πŸ‘34πŸ”₯28❀‍πŸ”₯26❀22😍17

Signed MICHAEL | π‘Ίπ’–π’π’“π’Šπ’”π’† 𝑽𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 π‘ͺπ’‚π’‘π’Šπ’•π’‚π’

25 Oct 2026, 04:28 UTCviews β€”

𝗖π—₯𝗬𝗣𝗧𝗒 π—©π—”π—¨π—Ÿπ—§ | KOLS pinned a photo

24 Oct 2026, 14:31 UTCβ‰ˆ17,300 views201 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

NEW PARTNER β€” BIGGERZ We've partnered with BiggerZ.com, a Crypto Casino, Sportsbook & Prediction Market. EXCLUSIVE WELCOME OFFER 🎁 150% Welcome Bonus 🎰 100 Free Spins πŸ’Ž 15% Rakeback Every 30 Minutes πŸ† $1M+ Monthly Prize Pool Code: TGBEN Claim your welcome offer: https://www.biggerz.com/?ref=TGBEN

πŸ”₯37πŸ₯°37❀‍πŸ”₯27😍27πŸ‘26πŸŽ‰24❀23

Signed Haslet l 𝐍𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 πƒπŒ 𝐅𝐒𝐫𝐬𝐭

20 Oct 2026, 13:44 UTCviews β€”

𝗖π—₯𝗬𝗣𝗧𝗒 π—©π—”π—¨π—Ÿπ—§ | KOLS pinned a photo

20 Oct 2026, 13:44 UTCβ‰ˆ9,520 views250 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

When someone pays me in crypto, I don’t automatically assume every transfer has the same risk profile. VymoPay has AML checks that can help flag potential issues, and I can use dedicated addresses to keep incoming payments separated. For me, it’s a practical combination of payment organization and an extra source of information before deciding what to do next. Try it out for yourself: https://t.me/Vymopay_bot?start=M…

❀‍πŸ”₯41😍40πŸŽ‰39πŸ”₯38πŸ‘33❀31πŸ₯°28

Signed Haslet l 𝐍𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 πƒπŒ 𝐅𝐒𝐫𝐬𝐭

19 Oct 2026, 08:09 UTCviews β€”

𝗖π—₯𝗬𝗣𝗧𝗒 π—©π—”π—¨π—Ÿπ—§ | KOLS pinned a photo

19 Oct 2026, 08:08 UTCβ‰ˆ11,900 views218 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

β˜•οΈπŸš€ INTRODUCING $KOPI β€” A FRESH START IN THE SOLANA ECOSYSTEM! 🌎 WELCOME TO THE OFFICIAL $KOPI COMMUNITY! A new journey begins! We're excited to welcome our early supporters, community members, and future holders to the growing $KOPI community. πŸ”₯ $KOPI PRESALE COMING SOON! The next chapter is approaching, with the presale details and official timing to be announced through the project's official channels. πŸ’Ž WHY …

πŸ₯°37❀‍πŸ”₯35πŸ”₯35πŸŽ‰34πŸ‘29❀24😍24

Signed MICHAEL | π‘Ίπ’–π’π’“π’Šπ’”π’† 𝑽𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 π‘ͺπ’‚π’‘π’Šπ’•π’‚π’

17 Oct 2026, 11:43 UTCviews β€”

𝗖π—₯𝗬𝗣𝗧𝗒 π—©π—”π—¨π—Ÿπ—§ | KOLS pinned a video

17 Oct 2026, 11:41 UTCβ‰ˆ61,900 views209 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

▢️ $LITHO TGE IS LIVE! πŸ”΄A new chapter of Web4 begins with Lithosphere! πŸ–₯ πŸ’₯Following its public mainnet launch, Lithosphere officially launches the $LITHO Token Generation Event, marking a major milestone for its AI-native blockchain ecosystem. ⚑️ AI-Native Layer 1 Blockchain ▢️ Public Mainnet Now Live 🌐 Cross-Chain Web4 Infrastructure πŸ’Ž $LITHO Ecosystem Utility 🧠 Built for Autonomous AI Agents πŸ˜‡With mainnet opera…

πŸ‘38❀35πŸ₯°34😍34πŸŽ‰25πŸ”₯24❀‍πŸ”₯19

Signed Haslet l 𝐍𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 πƒπŒ 𝐅𝐒𝐫𝐬𝐭

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @Crypto_VaultNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ—–π—₯𝗬𝗣𝗧𝗒 π—©π—”π—¨π—Ÿπ—§ | KOLS” (@Crypto_VaultNews), 45,368 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_VaultNews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.