Channel

Crypto Signals Pumps

@Crypto_SignalsPumps

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

5,284subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001163109669
Type	Channel
Username	@Crypto_SignalsPumps
Created	14 June 2019 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	7 August 2026
Last confirmed live	14 August 2026
Measurements held	4
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/Crypto_SignalsPumps

Growth

4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,282–5,301 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
14 Aug 2026, 16:05	5,284	-9
11 Aug 2026, 00:35	5,293	-6
8 Aug 2026, 11:10	5,299	no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:45	5,299	first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 14 June 2019 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

27 Jan 2022, 18:07 UTC≈13,000 viewsread 12 August 2026

Forwarded from @CryptoForSurePhoto

Hello everyone, Our channel has grown tremendously over the last 24 hours. To celebrate this, we have are announcing a 3,000$ (10x 300$) giveaway! To take part follow these simple steps: 1) Join https://t.me/CryptoForSure 2) Invite as many people as you can 3) Follow https://twitter.com/Crypto_For_Sure on Twitter 4) DM @Crypto_For_Sure with proof Winners will be announced the moment …

Signed 🍁"eshg".pis pis*🌵🍂

26 Jan 2022, 18:32 UTC≈12,700 viewsread 12 August 2026

Forwarded from @CryptoForSure

On my channel you will get all crypto breaking news! If you appreciate my work please share this post everywhere. 👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/+OiEKnv5uTGI5NDE0 https://t.me/+OiEKnv5uTGI5NDE0 https://t.me/+OiEKnv5uTGI5NDE0 👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆

Signed 🍁"eshg".pis pis*🌵🍂

14 Jun 2019, 17:53 UTCviews —

Channel created

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @Crypto_SignalsPumps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Crypto For Sure
@CryptoForSure · 9992 posts

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Crypto For Sure
@CryptoForSure · 9991 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Handles this channel named that no longer answer

Dead references: 1; handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone: 0; we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive: 1; vacant every time we have ever looked

@Crypto_SignalsPumps named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.

Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.

Never seen alive

References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.

@crypto_for_sure
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Signals Pumps” (@Crypto_SignalsPumps), 5,284 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_SignalsPumps.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.