$BTCDOM UPDATE Bitcoin dominance is currently trading around 5,528 and has bounced from the ascending trendline support below. If this trendline continues to hold Bitcoin dominance could push back up from here keeping pressure on altcoins. If it breaks below this trendline instead that would open the door for further downside, giving altcoins room to move higher. This trendline needs to be watched closely from here.…

Channel
Crypto Trading Signals®️
@Crypto_Moon_Mission
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
7,194subscribers
-99 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001443553921 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Crypto_Moon_Mission |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Crypto_Moon_Mission |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 7,194 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 7,207 | -13 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 7,220 | -15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 7,235 | -12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 7,247 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 7,259 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 7,271 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 7,290 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 7,293 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 7,293 | first reading |
Engagement
69 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.09%
- avg views ÷ 7,194 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 151
- 69 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 69
- of 69 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (3 August 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,394 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
https://x.com/Sherlockwhale/status/2090100166111961263
BTC UPDATE x $65.5K RETEST Bitcoin giving another retest of the $65.5K resistance zone, which has already rejected price several times over the past few weeks. Be careful with longs here because this is still resistance until price proves otherwise with a convincing close above it. At the same time, I am not a big fan of shorting Bitcoin directly after a level has already been tested this many times, since every re…
BTC UPDATE x SECOND RETEST The first retest of $65K is done and, just like the previous attempts over the last few weeks, price was rejected again. Nothing has changed there. However, the first rejection from $65K has usually been followed by another attempt, often with a deeper push into the main resistance around $65.5K. As long as price continues to hold above the $64K July POC, I think another retest of $65.5K …
OTHERS DOMINANCE UPDATE As expected OTHERS Dominance got rejected from the resistance zone and continued moving lower. It is currently trading around 7.39% and is now moving down toward the support zone below. If this support holds OTHERS Dominance could bounce back up from here giving some relief to altcoins. If this support breaks instead that would open the door for further downside keeping pressure on altcoins. …
USDT DOMINANCE UPDATE As discussed in the last update USDT dominance got rejected from the trendline resistance and moved down toward the support zone below and that continued to play out. It is currently trading around 8.413% and is now sitting right at this support level. If this support continues to hold USDT dominance could push back up from here keeping pressure on BTC and the market. If this support breaks ins…
BTC UPDATE x JULY POC Price did not sweep the $62.2K equal lows and has now reclaimed July’s POC around $64K. We are still moving inside the same range, but price is currently consolidating just above this level, which makes the next 4H close after the New York open important. If Bitcoin survives that close above $64K, then I think it goes for another retest of the $65K-$65.5K resistance. We will see whether that a…
$BTCDOM UPDATE Bitcoin dominance is currently trading around 5,464 and is retesting the ascending trendline from below. If this trendline holds as resistance altcoins could continue to see some strength here. If price reclaims back above the trendline instead that would keep the pressure back on altcoins. This trendline remains important to watch closely from here. Join our Discord server → [Join Here]
https://x.com/Sherlockwhale/status/2089337142065426840
BTC UPDATE x THE COUNTDOWN For weeks I have been writing almost the same stablecoin dominance update because the chart has not resolved so far, but the Bitcoin volatility study I shared three days ago on X gives an actual deadline on this indecision. Bitcoin’s 14 day range is now more compressed than 99.5% of its entire history. I found 19 previous independent cases where volatility reached this level, and all 19 p…
Photo, posted without a caption
$BTC UPDATE Bitcoin is currently trading around 63,418 and has broken back above the yearly VWAP after the recent consolidation though the quarterly VWAP still sits above as resistance. If Bitcoin manages to hold above the yearly VWAP that could give price a chance to push further up toward the quarterly VWAP and the resistance zone above. If price loses the yearly VWAP again instead that would open the door for fur…
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @Crypto_Moon_Mission. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Trading Signals®️” (@Crypto_Moon_Mission), 7,194 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_Moon_Mission.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.