Channel
@Crypto_Moon_Mission
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,000subscribers
-293 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001443553921 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Crypto_Moon_Mission |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Crypto_Moon_Mission |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 7,000 | -22 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 03:21 | 7,022 | -42 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 7,064 | -32 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 7,096 | -17 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 7,113 | -23 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 7,136 | -26 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:35 | 7,162 | -21 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 7,183 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 7,194 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 7,207 | -13 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 7,220 | -15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 7,235 | -12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 7,247 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 7,259 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 7,271 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 7,290 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 7,293 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 7,293 | first reading |
69 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 69 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
$BTCDOM UPDATE Bitcoin dominance is currently trading around 5,528 and has bounced from the ascending trendline support below. If this trendline continues to hold Bitcoin dominance could push back up from here keeping pressure on altcoins. If it breaks below this trendline instead that would open the door for further downside, giving altcoins room to move higher. This trendline needs to be watched closely from here.…
https://x.com/Sherlockwhale/status/2090100166111961263
BTC UPDATE x $65.5K RETEST Bitcoin giving another retest of the $65.5K resistance zone, which has already rejected price several times over the past few weeks. Be careful with longs here because this is still resistance until price proves otherwise with a convincing close above it. At the same time, I am not a big fan of shorting Bitcoin directly after a level has already been tested this many times, since every re…
BTC UPDATE x SECOND RETEST The first retest of $65K is done and, just like the previous attempts over the last few weeks, price was rejected again. Nothing has changed there. However, the first rejection from $65K has usually been followed by another attempt, often with a deeper push into the main resistance around $65.5K. As long as price continues to hold above the $64K July POC, I think another retest of $65.5K …
OTHERS DOMINANCE UPDATE As expected OTHERS Dominance got rejected from the resistance zone and continued moving lower. It is currently trading around 7.39% and is now moving down toward the support zone below. If this support holds OTHERS Dominance could bounce back up from here giving some relief to altcoins. If this support breaks instead that would open the door for further downside keeping pressure on altcoins. …
USDT DOMINANCE UPDATE As discussed in the last update USDT dominance got rejected from the trendline resistance and moved down toward the support zone below and that continued to play out. It is currently trading around 8.413% and is now sitting right at this support level. If this support continues to hold USDT dominance could push back up from here keeping pressure on BTC and the market. If this support breaks ins…
BTC UPDATE x JULY POC Price did not sweep the $62.2K equal lows and has now reclaimed July’s POC around $64K. We are still moving inside the same range, but price is currently consolidating just above this level, which makes the next 4H close after the New York open important. If Bitcoin survives that close above $64K, then I think it goes for another retest of the $65K-$65.5K resistance. We will see whether that a…
$BTCDOM UPDATE Bitcoin dominance is currently trading around 5,464 and is retesting the ascending trendline from below. If this trendline holds as resistance altcoins could continue to see some strength here. If price reclaims back above the trendline instead that would keep the pressure back on altcoins. This trendline remains important to watch closely from here. Join our Discord server → [Join Here]
https://x.com/Sherlockwhale/status/2089337142065426840
BTC UPDATE x THE COUNTDOWN For weeks I have been writing almost the same stablecoin dominance update because the chart has not resolved so far, but the Bitcoin volatility study I shared three days ago on X gives an actual deadline on this indecision. Bitcoin’s 14 day range is now more compressed than 99.5% of its entire history. I found 19 previous independent cases where volatility reached this level, and all 19 p…
Photo, posted without a caption
$BTC UPDATE Bitcoin is currently trading around 63,418 and has broken back above the yearly VWAP after the recent consolidation though the quarterly VWAP still sits above as resistance. If Bitcoin manages to hold above the yearly VWAP that could give price a chance to push further up toward the quarterly VWAP and the resistance zone above. If price loses the yearly VWAP again instead that would open the door for fur…
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @Crypto_Moon_Mission. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Trading Signals®️” (@Crypto_Moon_Mission), 7,000 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_Moon_Mission.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.