Channel
@Crypto_Enchanter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,870subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002519976071 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Crypto_Enchanter |
| Created | 2 April 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Crypto_Enchanter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 4,870 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 4,872 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 4,878 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 4,880 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 4,884 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 4,884 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 2 April 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
320 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 91 | 28.4% | |
| ❤ | 81 | 25.3% | |
| 😁 | 55 | 17.2% | |
| 🎉 | 49 | 15.3% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 13.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 320reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2025 to 9 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👍Wealth Is Never Built Overnight，But Through Steady Growth Day by Day Stanford’s quantitative grid strategy is the best tool to help you achieve long-term compounding. Let time work for you, and let returns accumulate for you. 🔗Stanford Website : https://stanford.ltd/#/register?ref=iq0rae 🌐Invitation code : iq0rae 📱Official Channel : https://t.me/Stanford_Official_Channel
Crypto Enchanter pinned Deleted message
VanEck prepares to file for BNB ETF The documents have already appeared on the website of the State of Delaware, which usually precedes the filing of an application with the SEC - the US Securities and Exchange Commission. This could be the first attempt to launch a BNB ETF on the American market, which will positively affect the recognition of BNB as a full-fledged financial asset.😳😳😳
❤25👍20😁20🔥15🎉12
Top RWA tokens by social activity. The real asset tokenization (RWA) sector is actively developing, and social activity around projects has become a key indicator of their popularity.😂😂😂
❤24👍15🔥14🎉12😁7
The number of Bitcoin holders (non-empty wallets) has exceeded 54.71 million, just 0.018% lower than the all-time high of 54.72 million set on January 19, 2025. . .😱😱😱
👍27❤16😁14🎉12🔥5
The FDIC issued Financial Institution Letter FIL-7-2025, clarifying that FDIC-regulated banks can engage in permitted crypto-related activities without prior approval, as long as they properly manage the associated risks. The letter also revoked the earlier FIL-16-2022 issued in 2022.😅😅😅
👍29❤16😁14🎉13🔥10
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Crypto_Enchanter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 248,139 of 1,585,237entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@Crypto_Enchanter named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Enchanter” (@Crypto_Enchanter), 4,870 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_Enchanter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.