Monad Airdrop Claim Portal opens on Tuesday, October 14th
❤6🔥3👍2⚡1💯1🤩1

Channel
@Crypto_Airdrops_Channelz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,969subscribers
-920 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002145483058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Crypto_Airdrops_Channelz |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Crypto_Airdrops_Channelz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 32,969 | -73 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 33,042 | -56 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 33,098 | -45 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 33,143 | -29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 33,172 | -62 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:07 | 33,234 | -41 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 33,275 | -91 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 33,366 | -126 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 33,492 | -55 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 33,547 | -45 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 33,592 | -43 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 33,635 | -50 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 33,685 | -89 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 33,774 | -99 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 33,873 | -16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 33,889 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 2 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
511 reactions across 18 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 242 | 47.4% | |
| ❤ | 110 | 21.5% | |
| 🔥 | 54 | 10.6% | |
| 🎉 | 52 | 10.2% | |
| 🤩 | 16 | 3.13% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 1.37% | |
| 🆒 | 6 | 1.17% | |
| 🍾 | 5 | 0.978% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 0.978% | |
| 🗿 | 4 | 0.783% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 0.587% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.391% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.391% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.391% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.196% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 511reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 October 2024 to 10 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Crypto_Airdrops_Channelz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 October 2024 to 10 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Monad Airdrop Claim Portal opens on Tuesday, October 14th
❤6🔥3👍2⚡1💯1🤩1
Mint 🔔🔔 🔻MINT Airdrop $15000 Worth Tokens to 2K Users [ Random ] Link — https://wn.nr/77rUHyh ➡️Complete simple task [ Follow , Retweet post ] and Join Telegram ➡️ Submit Your Metamask OR OKX Wallet OR Coinbase Wallet Ethereum Address ✅Done 🔴Winner's Announcement 3 October
❤7🤩3🍾2🗿1🥰1
After months of development, Quack AI is finally making its move. The project just confirmed its token — $Q — through community voting, and now it’s set to go live on Binance Alpha on September 2. Binance Futures is also on the list. This one’s got people talking — governance, AI agents, multi-chain traction, and now a major listing. 👀 But here’s what I’m wondering: How many more exchanges will $Q launch on? What’…
❤6🔥3👍2🎉1
✅If we do it Huge news in Web3 governance! Quack AI has raised $3.6M from some of the biggest names in the space — Animoca Brands, 071Labs, SkylandVC, Kenetic Capital, Scaling Labs, CARV, Merlin Layer2, and more.💃💃 😍This isn’t just another funding round. Quack AI is re‑shaping how decisions are made on‑chain, and with BNB Chain collaborations heating up, this could unlock massive opportunities for builders, voters,…
❤17🔥14🎉13👍10🍾1😍1
QuackAI News ❤️🔥 📣 QuackAI is Collaboration With Linea Join the campaign and earn rewards by interacting with AI and voting on proposals There are very few users on QuackAI right now and They partnering and collaborating with top projects. Full Details Here — https://x.com/QuackAI_AI/status/1941087495665660096 What you can do with Quack AI: Read AI-generated proposal summaries 2× AIQ for All chat Interactions…
❤16👍15🔥10🎉9❤🔥2
Quack AI just launched on BNB Chain. And it’s not alone — 6 BNB projects are using it for governance: Mind Network, LiveArt, Space ID, FAIR3, Zypher, StarryNift. Minting the Quack AI Passport gives access to: - Airdrop eligibility - AI-powered chat (2x $AIQ per convo) - Voting rewards (200 $AIQ per vote) Over 30,000 passports already minted. This could turn into something big. Mint here: https://app.quackai.ai/q…
❤16🎉13🔥10👍9🍾2💘2🗿2🥰2
50 USDT Quack AI GIVEAWAY 💃💃💃 Connect Wallet And Try Quack AI Product ☺️☺️☺️ Link - https://app.quackai.ai/quackipedia?inviterCode=m0pfe8& SEND SS AFTER COMPLETING TASK DM - @Legend_Itachi82 MAKE SURE YOU GUYS PARTICIPATE TO SEND SS IN DM 😄😄
🔥3👍2🤩1🥰1
Just found something that flips the script on how we think about DAOs: An AI tool that lets you earn $AIQ just by chatting. No tokens to buy. No forms to fill. Just show up, talk to the AI, and start stacking points. Then there’s the invite system — 💃 Your friend signs up + chats once = you get 100 $AIQ 🟢 Plus, you earn 10% of their chat points forever You’re literally getting rewarded for helping build the ecosy…
❤16👍14🎉11🔥7🤩2💯1
🚀Quack AI Introduces AI-Powered DAO Governance! 🦆 Traditional DAOs face challenges like low participation, slow execution, and uninformed voting. Quack AI changes the game by integrating AI-driven automation, making governance smarter, faster, and more efficient. 🔑 Why Quack AI? 🔍 AI-Powered Proposal Analysis – Ensures well-informed governance decisions. 💃 Automated Execution – No delays, just seamless implementati…
❤4🔥4🎉2🥰2💘1
Don't miss give good profit
👍10❤1🤩1
https://t.me/vertus_app_bot/app?startapp=1585735229
👍8❤2
Another Free Sui 😏 🔻Watch Full Video And See Sui Balance After Staking Ocean Tokens New User Join Now :- https://t.me/waveonsuibot/walletapp?startapp=5053097 Keep Collecting Ocean Tokens And Wave Points Both Are Important For Airdrop Also You Get Sui Tokens When You Stake Your Wave Tokens
👍20❤2🤩1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Crypto_Airdrops_Channelz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Crypto_Airdrops_Channelz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto All Airdrops Oz” (@Crypto_Airdrops_Channelz), 32,969 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_Airdrops_Channelz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.