Все подписались? 👇 Лесенка со 100$ до 10.000$ — https://t.me/+1CyOVLp10EhhMDMy Никто еще не показывал такой результат всего за 15 дней, успевайте!!! #промо

Channel
КриптоВыжимки
@CryptoVizhimki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,968subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002939007882 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoVizhimki |
| Description | Экономим ваше время на просмотре контента. 🤝🏻 Ссылка для друга: https://t.me/+WiJKwYH-2ZxhZjdi Админ/по рекламе: @korshinw Менеджеры: @Leev365 @Darks_777 @elrond_promo @inushibak |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoVizhimki |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 4,968 | -24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 4,992 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 4,993 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 4,991 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 4,991 | first reading |
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 35.8%
- avg views ÷ 4,968 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,780
- 36 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.15%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 36
- of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 64,088 |
| Reactions total | 1,375 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 407
- Videos
- 133
- Links
- 533
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 05s
- Average length
- 42s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,285 reactions across 32 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 488 | 38.0% | |
| 👍 | 361 | 28.1% | |
| 🔥 | 197 | 15.3% | |
| ❤ | 63 | 4.90% | |
| 🙈 | 47 | 3.66% | |
| 🤔 | 33 | 2.57% | |
| 😢 | 23 | 1.79% | |
| 🤝 | 21 | 1.63% | |
| 😱 | 20 | 1.56% | |
| 🙏 | 10 | 0.778% | |
| 🎃 | 7 | 0.545% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 0.467% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 0.311% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.233% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.078% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.078% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,375reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⏳ вы просили - мы делаем! первый в своем роде марафон с 100$ до 10.000$ за 15 дней. успейте урвать первую ступень 🔴 😏Примут 25 человек ⬇️ httpshttps://t.me/+1CyOVLp10EhhMDMy #промо
🔥4🙈4👍1
❗️Сейлор 6 лет занимал деньги, чтобы потратить $64 млрд на покупку биткоина на хаях, а теперь каждую неделю продаёт его на дне, чтобы наскрести кэш на погашение долгов.😁😁 Подпишись на криптовыжимки 🤝
😁30👍6🔥3
🤔«Я НИКОГДА не призывал всех заходить в альты и ждать альтсезон. На 100% в альткоинах тоже не сидел, поэтому ваши проблемы с портфелями - не ко мне. Сам ждал Альтсезон, имея около 40% в альте. Часть позиций закрывал в плюс, но многое осталось» - #PifagorTrade в новом видео. 👉При этом ещё в феврале он уже говорил, что этот цикл стал одним из худших для альткоинов, многие проекты до альтсезона просто не доживут, а сам…
❤20🤝11🙈5😁3👌2🔥2🤔2👍1
👉Strategy снова продает BTC. 👉Голосование по CLARITY Act в Сенате США перенесли, а шансы на принятие закона в этом году оценивают всего в 15%. 👉2 биржи закрылись - BitMEX и BitMart. 👉Напряжённость вокруг Ормузского пролива всё ещё сохраняется. 🤔 А BTC на всём этом фоне уже перестал падать и держится около $65к. Неужели дно уже поставлено? Подпишись на криптовыжимки 🤝
👍15🤔10🎃3❤1🔥1
🔥 50 огней набрали очень быстро! Как и обещал, я подготовил подробный разбор этой неэффективности и того, как на ней можно зарабатывать) ❗️Тема оказалась гораздо объёмнее нескольких постов, поэтому я решил не ужимать информацию, а вынести её в отдельный канал Там подробно расскажу: ⏺когда именно сойдутся цены и почему ⏺как благодаря этой неэффективности мы фактически знаем будущее))) — когда я впервые понял, как …
🔥18🙈8🤝3
И хотите самый главный прикол?Цены всегда 100% становятся одинаковыми и там и там!!! Более того, я даже знаю точную дату когда это произойдет!!!)😄😄😄 Вот такая неэффективность есть на рынке)) грубо говоря, это тоже самое, что знать сколько будет стоить биткоин через 3 месяца и не использовать это) 🔥— с вас 50 огней и подробнее расскажу как можно на этом зарабатывать)
🔥74👍6🙈2
Замечали такую аномалию? А именно разницу в цене одного и того же актива - в данном случае золота - на Мосбирже и международном рынке? 👍🏻— да 😱— нет Подпишись на криптовыжимки 🤝
😱20👍17
😨Я никогда не сидел в альтах на 100%, поэтому ваши разочарования имеют ко мне мало отношения - #Pifagor_Trade 🤷♂️При этом в альткоинах у него было около 30-35% портфеля, а раньше вероятность fльтсезона он оценивал в 90-95%. 📍По BTC ⏺Считает, что возврат к $71к с высокой вероятностью ещё будет. ⏺Шорты рассматривает частями: с текущих на 2/10 объёма, далее от $67,6к и $71к. Цель - $59,7к. ⏺Биткоин покупает ежедневно…
😁26👍15🔥6❤2
😅 #ЮраФранциско снова готов к любому движению рынка: локально ждёт отскок, но глобально допускает продолжение падения BTC. ⏺Более агрессивные покупки на спот рассматривает в сентябре-октябре, преимущественно по фундаментальным монетам. ⏺С середины августа ждёт повышенную волатильность из-за возможного оттока ликвидности на фоне рефинансирования долга. ⏺Для продолжения роста BTC нужен закреп 2-3 недельными свечами вы…
😁17👍6❤5🔥3👌1
😕 К 2027–2028 годам большая часть твоих альткоинов может просто исчезнуть. 📊 К такому выводу можно прийти из статистики CryptoRank: около 62% токенов из Топ-100 не переживают даже 5 лет. 📍А если в портфеле много монет за пределами Топ-100, доля «мертвых» активов к 2027–2028 годам потенциально может доходить уже до 75–90%. 🕰 При этом многие инфлюенсеры, которые всё ещё верят в Альтсезон, теперь как раз ждут его в 2…
👍15😁9🔥6❤2
"Встретил парня сегодня. Возраст: 27 Портфель: $6 миллионов Начал инвестировать в этом году. Цель: отойти от дел в 35. Я спросил, как он так быстро сколотил $6 лямов. Он сказал: дисциплина и долларовое усреднение (DCA). Он унаследовал $8 миллионов и усреднял их в альткойны" 😅 Подпишись на криптовыжимки 🤝
😁60🙈10❤3👍3🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @CryptoVizhimki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Альтсезон начнётся в ближайшие 2 года?
- Легко38%
- Маловероятно10%
- Альтсезона больше не будет24%
- Большинство альтов обнулится27%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Покупал ли ты BTC или ETH за последние пару месяцев?
- Да26%
- Нет48%
- Покупал только альткоины10%
- Пока нет свободных денег16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 615,974 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КриптоВыжимки” (@CryptoVizhimki), 4,968 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoVizhimki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.