Okx Card Problem Solved Check ππ₯
π₯11π3β€2

Channel
@CryptoUpdate7867
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
29,461subscribers
-320 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001712031242 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoUpdate7867 |
| Description | Crypto Update is a Crypto Airdrop & Trading Related Area ! We Accept Collaboration, Advertisement & AMA Project. Follow Us : https://x.com/Web3_view Owner/Addsβ @Krishan3000 support admin : @Arafat276 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoUpdate7867 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 29,461 | -41 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 29,502 | -39 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:03 | 29,541 | -140 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 29,681 | -39 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 29,720 | -61 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 29,781 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (31 July 2026 β 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 106,930 |
| Reactions total | 907 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
907 reactions across 40 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 447 | 49.3% | |
| π | 179 | 19.7% | |
| π₯ | 151 | 16.6% | |
| π | 58 | 6.39% | |
| π’ | 44 | 4.85% | |
| π | 19 | 2.09% | |
| π | 6 | 0.662% | |
| π± | 3 | 0.331% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 907reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Okx Card Problem Solved Check ππ₯
π₯11π3β€2
OKX Card Reward End π Almost 70+ Acount Ready But, Madcud OKX π€‘
π58π₯3π2β€1
Part Time Job ππ₯ Next 15-16 tarik users nibo... Ekn Kauke dukabo na
β€13π3π1
80$+ Payment Weeklyβ Monthly Stable Earning ππ₯ 200 Member Joined, Only 12 Member Are Printing Money From Sms Panel
β€18π±3π2π2
Check 11$ GVRT Recived ππ₯ OKX X GVRT Flash Payment!
β€15π₯4π4π’1
11$ Grvt Payment Tomorrow ππ₯
β€12π₯4π1
Claim Free OKX VISA Card π₯π - Hold 10$ X Layer Chain - Claim Your Visa Card Instant
β€20π₯4π3
πBybit x MBX Airdrop π°Get Reward 5$ USDT πFirst 700 Users βΆοΈSubmit Form :- Ended β - Trade 10$+ In MBX/USDT - Submit Details On Form - Done
β€13π3π1
1$~ 10$ Pros Claim Live ππ₯
π₯13β€3π2
Complete Activity Task Fcfs π₯π βΆοΈEvent Link :- https://telegram.me/sixsevenclub_bot/app?startapp=ref_319088f9
β€8π₯1π1
$100,000 Pre-Registration π₯π β‘οΈ Join LINK- https://cade.market/meme-madness/register?ref=rhvdt6xrmb&campaign=meme-madness-2026 - Sign-Up with Google - Bind X Account & Complete Task - Done
β€14π₯2π1
14 Hours Left To End ππ₯ Total 2000 Pros Reward!
π11β€4π₯4
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @CryptoUpdate7867. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@CryptoUpdate7867 edited 2 posts after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ₯π¬π£π§π’ π¨π£πππ§πβ π€β¨β (@CryptoUpdate7867), 29,461 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoUpdate7867.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.