Tools to mine crypto without the headache.
Browser, mining pool & farm - all in one ecosystem.
Explore:
ctpool.net | cryptotabfarm.com | cryptobrowser.site
Created
Between 1 July 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 51 days, net +3,693. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89,378–94,597 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 07:00
93,995
+661
19 Sept 2026, 09:00
93,334
+318
16 Sept 2026, 19:39
93,016
+1,505
15 Sept 2026, 00:38
91,511
+227
13 Sept 2026, 13:18
91,284
+245
11 Sept 2026, 21:18
91,039
+974
9 Sept 2026, 08:58
90,065
-44
5 Sept 2026, 22:58
90,109
-33
3 Sept 2026, 19:20
90,142
-89
2 Sept 2026, 08:34
90,231
-41
1 Sept 2026, 11:45
90,272
-74
31 Aug 2026, 11:35
90,346
+38
30 Aug 2026, 10:26
90,308
-9
29 Aug 2026, 12:49
90,317
-12
28 Aug 2026, 10:25
90,329
+1
27 Aug 2026, 08:03
90,328
+348
26 Aug 2026, 10:11
89,980
-14
25 Aug 2026, 12:38
89,994
-16
24 Aug 2026, 13:34
90,010
-41
22 Aug 2026, 20:13
90,051
first reading
Engagement
79 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 109 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.35%
avg views ÷ 93,995 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,030
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 79 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held
79 (28 July 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total
186,201
Reactions total
3,687
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
585
Videos
18
Links
559
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 26s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,086 reactions across 78 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,638
51.9%
⚡
1,330
26.2%
👍
445
8.75%
🌚
255
5.01%
🍾
98
1.93%
❤🔥
86
1.69%
🌭
54
1.06%
🍓
40
0.786%
🔥
23
0.452%
🤣
21
0.413%
🥴
17
0.334%
😁
14
0.275%
🕊
11
0.216%
😈
11
0.216%
🤔
9
0.177%
😱
8
0.157%
🤯
8
0.157%
👏
7
0.138%
💯
6
0.118%
🐳
2
0.039%
2 further kinds
3
0.059%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,086 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
115
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 78 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CryptoTabChannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 79 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Crypto Is for Everyone, Not Just the Elite: Agree? 🌐
Accessibility is one of CryptoTab's core principles: making crypto easier to explore, understand, and use.
Our core belief:
📌 Crypto is for everyone, not just developers or deep-pocketed investors.
📌 Complexity and jargon shouldn't be gatekeepers to financial freedom.
📌 The real value lies in participation, not exclusivity.
No hardware, no expertise - just an ea…
Let's play lucky this weekend!
Rules:
— Roll 🎲 in the comments.
— Random authors who roll a "6" win 200 HSH each.
— A new winner is picked every 8 hours.
Schedule:
Sep 25
— 16:00–24:00 UTC · 🎁 1 winner
Sep 26
— 00:00–08:00 UTC · 🎁 1 winner
— 08:00–16:00 UTC · 🎁 1 winner
— 16:00–24:00 UTC · 🎁 1 winner
Sep 27
— 00:00–08:00 UTC · 🎁 1 winner
— 08:00–16:00 UTC · 🎁 1 winner
— 16:00–24:00 UTC · 🎁 1 winner
Results will be…
📣 Time to Power Up
Our community challenge is still live - your emojis keep those HSH batteries charging!
Here's the deal:
1. Hit this post with a ⚡️
2. The more reactions we get, the quicker the battery fills up.
3. One lucky chatter walks away with 150 HSH 🎁
Some posts are still not charged, and rewards are waiting for you!
Full list:
- 4 Institutions Shaping the Crypto 72/100 ⚡️
- Crypto In 2012–2017 49/75 ⚡…
THURSDAY CHAT: Who Mines the Most? ⛏️
Our new article: who, where, why - and the hotspots and purchases driving CryptoTab mining!
Now we want to hear YOUR take:
🔸 Which stat surprised you the most?
🔸 Did the biggest mining regions match your expectations—or completely defy them?
🔸 What stood out about the products or sales trends behind the activity?
🔸 What would you like us to dig into next?
Tell us which point y…
🎉 CHRISTINE IS GIVING AWAY PRIZES! 🎉
It's CryptoTab's birthday, and our brand new avatar Christine isn't celebrating quietly.
She's sharing her gifts and prizes with the community that made it possible!
How to join Christine celebrating:
1. Join CryptoTab community on Telegram
2. Hit "Join Giveaway” button
3. Wait till September 30th for the draw results 💻
Prizes to grab:
1. x15 Free Miners
2. And a big one: 15…
How Much Do You Know About 2012–2017 In Crypto? 🤔
Bitcoin's growth, new exchanges, developer innovation, and a multi-currency ecosystem.
Key milestones included:
2012: First Bitcoin halving – Block rewards dropped from 50 to 25 BTC, introducing scarcity mechanics and sparking early debates on supply and price.
2013–2014: Ecosystem growth – Exchanges matured, merchant adoption rose, and altcoins multiplied, with 2…
4 Institutions Shaping the Global Crypto Landscape 🌍
Global organizations shape national digital asset policies.
Here are 4 most influential of them right now:
🇺🇸 SEC
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission oversees securities markets and has become a key regulator in major crypto-related cases and policy debates.
🌐 IOSCO
The International Organization of Securities Commissions brings together securities re…
WEEKEND CHAT: Your Airdrop Story? 💬
Best airdrop tales? Effort, stress, and mistakes - not the token.
Now we want to hear YOUR story:
🔸 What was the campaign or quest you had to complete?
🔸 Did you hit the snapshot or get caught off guard?
🔸 What did you learn about verifying links and protecting your keys?
🔸 What happened to the tokens afterwards - held, sold, or rugged?
Don't just say "free money." Tell the full…
🎁 CRYPTOTAB GIVEAWAY
We reached 200 likes and as promised, the community gets its reward.
Starting now, you can activate a x5 hashrate boost for all new miners purchased in CT Pool!
More activity in the upcoming events = bigger rewards. Stay tuned!
🎁 Grab your x5 boost
Do You Know The Idea Behind CryptoTab? 🤔
Mining and Web3 are complex - but the user experience doesn't have to be.
That's why we focus on:
⛏️ Accessibility: Lowering the barrier to getting started.
🌐 Practicality: Building tools people can actually use.
🔍 Transparency: Helping users understand what they're doing.
👥 Community: Improving through real user feedback.
"It’s a fantastic way for beginners to get a tas…
❤74⚡14👍10🤔7🌚3
Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @CryptoTabChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@CryptoTabChannel edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoTab” (@CryptoTabChannel), 93,995 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoTabChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.