Channel
@CryptoT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,616subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001068031862 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoT |
| Created | 17 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 1,616 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 1,619 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 1,623 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 1,624 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 1,623 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:10 | 1,627 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 1,628 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 3 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Bitcoin is currently setting a fluctuation range from $61,000 to $72,000. Although the price of Bitcoin remains within this range, the RSI has fallen below the price level. Once the $61,000 support is breached, Bitcoin is expected to drop to the $50,000 - $53,000 support zone. When Bitcoin falls, altcoins will also be affected. However, these are just short-term fluctuations. This period reminds us of the market…
Here's the trend of the USDT.D index. As you can see, USDT.D has formed an extended uptrend since mid-2018, and this trend is gradually weakening. Based on technical indicators, we're observing a significant downtrend in USDT.D. This means it's likely to break its current uptrend and drop to levels around 3.76%, or even lower to 2.6%. What does this mean? If USDT.D falls to these levels, we could be entering a sup…
Stock $COIN (Coinbase) if you're holding https://www.tradingview.com/chart/COIN/ALunZ4AJ-Coin-Coinbase/
▪️ Bitcoin With the current trend, Bitcoin is expected to rise to $48,000. That is also the nearest significant resistance level. ▪️Ethereum ETH is forming an Ascending Triangle pattern, and it is likely to break out of this pattern soon and rise to $2,200. This will be the initial resistance zone, and ETH will consolidate here for a while before climbing to $3,500. ▪️Chainlink LINK has been accumulating for an …
In the past, we had anticipated that USDt.D would decrease by 4.3% in May. However, that hasn't happened yet, and now might be the opportune time for USDt.D to break below the support channel and drop to 5.0%. Here are the targets for the main coins we currently hold: BTC is expected to rise to the range of $39,000 - $47,000. ETH is projected to increase to the range of $2,900 - $3,500. LINK seems to be in a prolon…
Above is a comparison chart between DXY and Bitcoin. Let's look at their similarities: In both the DXY and BTC charts, I have drawn the corresponding trends (red lines) within the same time frame. From 2017 to 2018: DXY decreased from 103.8 to 88.1, and during the same time, BTC increased from $800 to $19,000. From 2020 to 2021: DXY decreased from a peak of 103 to 89.2, and during the same time, BTC increased from…
💹 DXY - U.S. Dollar Index 🎯 Main target 101.5 ✊ Second target 97.8 https://www.tradingview.com/chart/DXY/LlF0nd4f-DXY/ @CryptoT | CryptoT.io | @iCrypto
BITCOIN SPOT ETF APPROVED
Happy Birthday, Bitcoin!
This thread is amazing and wise and true and worth reading - here
DYDX On December 1st, a large quantity of DYDX tokens will be unlocked for investors (see here: https://token.unlocks.app/dydx). Currently, DYDX has broken out of a prolonged accumulation zone over the past year. We may see DYDX pushed up soon before the tokens are unlocked for investors. We are keeping an eye on two levels: $7.0 and $9.4. @CryptoT
CryptoT pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CryptoT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@CryptoT named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoT” (@CryptoT), 1,616 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.