Channel
@CryptoSignalsCCK
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,069subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 16 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001626018151 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoSignalsCCK |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoSignalsCCK |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:08 | 1,069 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:37 | 1,072 | -3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:06 | 1,075 | -3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:07 | 1,078 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 1,082 | +1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:49 | 1,081 | +2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 12:01 | 1,079 | +2 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 1,077 | +10 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 1,067 | +21 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 1,046 | +1 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 1,045 | no change |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:47 | 1,045 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
56 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 31 | 55.4% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 33.9% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 10.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$BR refused to break 😱👆 - instant 180% recovery off the demand zone. Another good sign lands.... BR broke above the 0.54000 supply that triggered the 70% dump before. My take: shorting this isn't worth it. Stay away. — — @CryptoSignalsCCK | Prem Access
👍2❤1
$BTC SHORT ALERT 😱👆 - NEW FREE SIGNALS. -> Entry: Current range ✅ -> TP: See on the chart -> Invalidation: Hit above 76800 Bitcoin is weakening again on the LTF. The 15m structure just broke down and printed a new low. There’s potential for a SCALP SHORT from this zone. For the full breakdown, check the latest update. — — @CryptoSignalsCCK | Prem Access
🔥4
$BTC BIG UPDATE 😱👆 — 76k HTF zone broken. Bitcoin just gave clear HTF confirmation after 24 days of sideways range between 76k–81k. Now BTC breakdown. Nearest OB sits at 65k–62k. Roughly 15% drop from here. Usually takes two weeks or more to fill. I'm not fully bearish since I rarely swing trade anymore. This is just an early sign that BTC trend has shifted bearish. Also I closing all active spot alt positions no…
🔥3
$PEPE — TP1 hit. Instant. ✅🐻 Still holding. 1h downtrend structure intact — the 4h wicks are just liquidity hunts, not a reversal signal. Position stays open. More to come.
❤3🔥1
$PEPE SHORT SCALP Leverage: up to 25x | Margin max: 2% ENTRY 0.003411 ✅ - 0.003482 TAKE PROFIT 0.003294 ++ STOP LOSS 0.003552 (-3.7%) Short analysis: PEPE got rejected without breaking and make a new high. With market price action weakening, PEPE could continue lower after printing a bearish CHoCH on the LTF.
🔥1
Posted without readable text
$BTC lost bullish momentum. Long positions not safe. Retesting the 76k demand zone today after rejection from 79500. Re-entry long needs heavy LTF confirmation. Catching a falling knife isn't the best play right now. Bullish plan canceled. Waiting for further confirmation. Today's price action raises the chance of a breakdown below 76k.
❤3🔥1
$BTC rejected again at 79500. Done from here? 👀 Bounced 4% from the 76000 bottom call. Looking at the latest structure, BTC still has room to push higher. LTF OB at 77600 — right where price is now. If it holds in the near term, no need to worry about a breakdown below 76k. The rejection is the test. The OB is the answer. — — @CryptoSignalsCCK | Prem Access
❤3👍1🔥1
$GALA TP1 hit 😱👆. Clean free signals shared again. Moved a bit slow but green PnL proves it. Latest update said hold GALA till TP hit. GALA delivered. — — @CryptoSignalsCCK | Prem Access
❤2🔥2
$XRP hit ALL TPs. 1:4 RR. Closed with a bang. 🔥 Called the dip as a minor correction and continuation — XRP delivered exactly that. No hesitation, straight to the top. TP1 ✅ TP2 ✅ TP3 ✅ TP4 ✅ Setup closed. 1:4 secured. The fam ate well on this one. Premium fam had every TP mapped from day one. You know where the full picture lives. 👀🔥 — — @CryptoSignalsCCK | Prem Access
🔥3
$BTC broke above 77500 - and the week is just getting started.🔥 Weekend plan is playing out. Small correction, then straight back up - exactly as mapped. LTF supply at 77500 cracked today. Solid early sign to open the new week. Buy plan still active. No changes. 81K reclaim remains the target. — — @CryptoSignalsCCK | Prem Access
❤4
$GALA starting to build a solid recovery structure. 😱👆 No changes to the plan - LTF trend already strengthening. Holding this until TP hits. — — @CryptoSignalsCCK | Prem Access
👍2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoSignalsCCK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Signals CCK” (@CryptoSignalsCCK), 1,069 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoSignalsCCK.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.