Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Cryptoshillz

@CryptoShiIlz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,921subscribers

-51 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001367138021
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoShiIlz
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoShiIlz

Growth

3,9213,9723,946.57 August 2026 — 3,972 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,972 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,961 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,921 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,913–3,980 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:183,921-40
11 Aug 2026, 00:463,961-11
7 Aug 2026, 16:543,972no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:013,972first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

199 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8442.2%
👍4723.6%
🔥4221.1%
👏189.05%
💯42.01%
🤯21.01%
🌚10.503%
😱10.503%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 199reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2025 to 5 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Feb 2026, 11:29 UTC≈1,350 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚨 Market thoughts While twitter gurus flip bull → bear every week, I'm pretty much just relaxed and waiting. 🚨AI capex is huge, ROI unclear, rates still tight. No hype chasing. No panic selling. wait for confirmation — not listening to to CT and others just my own research. Patience > noise. https://x.com/i/status/2019379799995928999

👏52👍2💯2🔥2

1 Feb 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,620 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

GM Shilled <10 coins in a year. Not asleep — markets were cooked. No liquidity, nonstop rotations, infinite rugs, and timeline NPCs shilling fresh coins daily for 0 ROI. Never married a bias. Bull/bear labels are for exit liquidity. I adapt. Binance, best time in crypto for me was Kucoin era, then went on-chain — survived all of it. Been patient since end of 2024 while seeing lots of CT round-tripped lost and left.

👍166🔥3👏2

1 Feb 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,460 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2017914195954561407

👍3🔥1

25 Aug 2025, 21:59 UTC≈2,460 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Adding some $RBR in this zone and setting up some limit buys before I sleep Robotics the next big narrative. $2.1 million MC

🔥7👍4👏2🌚1

19 Aug 2025, 10:00 UTC≈2,580 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

GM Good launch today that you should keep your eyes on at 1pm UTC incubated by Proof. $HYPR ✅ RWA ✅ Good and Doxxed Team ✅ Backed by Real life multi million dollar companies. TG Channel/group: Https://t.me/hyprfund More details coming....

8👏5🔥5

9 Aug 2025, 08:08 UTC≈2,230 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

GM Nice to see ETH pushing. Once we see ATH we will see a surge of volume onchain. Careful of farmer Devs extracting Liquidity and being rugged. Less plays is actually more. $NRX and $VOCL 2 plays I'm holding right now and rumors of a SOLID PLAY coming - this one will hit hard you will not want to miss.

12👍6🔥1

23 Jul 2025, 10:24 UTC≈2,370 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

GM Been accumilating $VOCL around 2.2 mill and hopefully DCA if it dips . Trustable Safe team that gives it 100%. https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x75f802225060a136a24c6738d679bd5c94620d63?t=1753256736235

5👍2🔥2

15 Jul 2025, 09:56 UTC≈2,050 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026

GM ☀️ I’ve been in the space since 2017. I'm not a market expert, but I've survived previous cycles by adapting. Over the past couple of years, I’ve mainly focused on on-chain trading. That said, on-chain isn't as lucrative as it used to be—it now comes with a whole new set of challenges: Too many launchers and tax farms Devs abandoning projects after a few days (not even weeks) Market is full of Jeets and rotators

17👍5🔥5😱1

30 Jun 2025, 20:14 UTC≈2,090 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Added a gamble bag of $NRX in this dip 700k Hearing a good team - will deep dive to find more info. CA: 0xde860ac02d0f22363da499577ca7894afd8c98b4 https://www.dextools.io/app/en/token/norexa?t=1751311033457 NFA / DYOR

3👍2🔥2

26 Jun 2025, 11:09 UTC≈1,830 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Overall volume is shit. There's always a few gambles to take but if your thin on liquid then better you just relax and wait for easier better times. In the end the ones with the most liquid to continue playing are the ones that end up making it. Trade safe and sometimes no trade is the best trade you can take.

10👍4🔥2

21 Jun 2025, 12:41 UTC≈2,070 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

$Tired This one been CTOd and some crazy big wallets and chads aping hard. My bag of dust now back in profits. I already wrote it off so now just gonna hold and see where they can go as seeing a lot of hype building around

3🔥2💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CryptoShiIlz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cryptoshillz” (@CryptoShiIlz), 3,921 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoShiIlz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.