Channel
@CryptoSensy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
17,831subscribers
+4,340 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001771054485 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoSensy |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoSensy |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:36 | 17,831 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:49 | 17,838 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:21 | 17,845 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:51 | 17,850 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 19:10 | 17,854 | -10 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:45 | 17,864 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:41 | 17,867 | -5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 19:36 | 17,872 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:55 | 17,878 | -8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 14:34 | 17,886 | -6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:48 | 17,892 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 17,900 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:11 | 17,902 | -13 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:40 | 17,915 | -5 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 17,920 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:17 | 17,928 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:04 | 17,935 | -10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:01 | 17,945 | -7 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:17 | 17,952 | -17 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 12:54 | 17,969 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 7 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (7 August 2025 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 36,747 |
| Reactions total | 5,050 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 15:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5,202 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👾 | 4,063 | 78.1% | |
| ❤ | 535 | 10.3% | |
| 💯 | 525 | 10.1% | |
| 🐳 | 77 | 1.48% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.019% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.019% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CryptoSensy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2025 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Guys, we’re still looking for a new signal, but considering the current market conditions, I’m confident we’ll find one very soon Reading through your feedback on the previous signal, I noticed that many of you entered with unnecessarily small amounts that doesn’t really make sense because there’s no risk, and your profit depends directly on the size of your entry ❗️For example, if you had entered with $200,000 on …
🐳10👾10
Guys, I made over $180,000 in profit today 🤯 That’s a new personal best – all the numbers are in the screenshot I’m trading the same setup again tomorrow, this time with more capital – today’s results have made me even more confident in it The signal drops TOMORROW It’s the best setup we’ve found so far, and the limits finally let us trade with bigger positions Don’t miss the post – I’ll share the signal, break …
💯255❤249🐳10👾10
Alright guys, the signal goes live tomorrow – with a full breakdown and a step-by-step guide ❗️ As mentioned, the stated limit is up to $5 million per trade We haven’t seen limits this high in a while – I’m planning to go in with a large position myself, and I recommend you do the same The idea is simple – buy low, sell high Tomorrow I’ll walk you through the whole process – from buying to selling
💯264❤241🐳11👾10
Guys, I’ve checked everything – based on the test results, this is the best signal in my channel’s history❗️ I’ve never seen a combination of limits and price gaps like this – the results are seriously impressive I’ll drop the signal here this Thursday – exactly 2 days from now! I’ll show you how it works and walk you through all the details – turn on notifications so you don’t miss it
🐳10👾10❤2⚡1
❗️ I’ll post the signal on Tuesday This is one of those rare cases when: – The risk is minimal – Signals like this appear very rarely – Usually, they don’t last more than 2 days ⚠️ Turn on notifications so you don’t miss it We’ll post it in 2 days – stay ready
👾2,000🐳10❤3
Crypto Sensei pinned a photo
🤫 Let’s start with a simple one What is Crypto Arbitrage? In simple terms, it’s when we find a price difference for the same coin on two different exchanges We buy the coin at a lower price on one exchange and sell it at a higher price on another exchange 🧠 Example: We bought SOL for $5,000 on exchange “1” Then sold the same SOL for $5,500 on exchange “2” Profit: $500
👾406🐳12❤3
We're planning to post a crypto arbitrage signal - do you know what that is?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👾506🐳13
Guys, I see all your messages and requests for a new signal ⚡️ But please understand: signals like these are very rare Finding so many recently has been more a matter of luck, so we can’t expect this to keep happening all the time My team and I are working 24/7 to find a new signal, and we’ll share it here as soon as we find one Thanks to every one of you for being so active and supportive 🙏 📌 Pin our channel and…
👾1,000❤4
#BTC $122,000 ✈️
❤12👾11💯4
#BTC $121,000 👌
👾10❤8💯2
Here's the Analysis of #XTZ : #XTZ having very tricky price action and had a retracement phrase after the sharp up move. Price again have some push up and might form a new Higher High. Expect a push from here towards the resistance at $1.05 - $1.07.
👾10❤7🐳1
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @CryptoSensy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
We're planning to post a crypto arbitrage signal - do you know what that is?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Sensei” (@CryptoSensy), 17,831 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoSensy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.