Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Crypto Party

@CryptoPartyMoney

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry

5,080subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002187059524
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoPartyMoney
DescriptionTop Project Free Crypto
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoPartyMoney

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Slavik_investor_updates/68307 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC@CryptoPartyMoney/1435 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC0.98under a minute
@Slavik_investor_updates/68151 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC@CryptoPartyMoney/1414 · this entry1 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC0.98under a minute
@Slavik_investor_updates/681331 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC@CryptoPartyMoney/1411 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC0.98under a minute
@Slavik_investor_updates/68214 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC@CryptoPartyMoney/1422 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC0.98under a minute
@Slavik_investor_updates/68162 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC@CryptoPartyMoney/1416 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC0.97under a minute
@Slavik_investor_updates/681130 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC@CryptoPartyMoney/1409 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC0.97under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Slavik_investor_updates7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.98under a minute@Slavik_investor_updates (70)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @Slavik_investor_updates. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,0805,1165,0987 August 2026 — 5,116 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,114 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,080 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,075–5,121 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 02:115,080-34
7 Aug 2026, 19:355,114-2
7 Aug 2026, 16:325,116first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.29%
avg views ÷ 5,080 subscribers
Avg views / post
14.7
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
28
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held28 (30 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total412
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,130
Videos
52
Links
797

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC5 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AI: пока все строят AI-агентов, Google засунул их в карты - и в твой Gmail 🔭 😐 Ранее писали про GPT-Live, где OpenAI показал голосового агента с бронями, погодой и картами. Google не стал делать красивую демку - просто добавил то же самое в Maps, которым и так пользуются миллиарды. Ask Maps - это Gemini прямо внутри карт. Раньше он просто искал места. Теперь сам заказывает еду, бронирует отели и берёт билеты на соб

11 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC6 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ethereum: сеть переписывают так, чтобы её проверил ИИ 🤔 👇 😐 Ранее писали как Виталик обновил Lean и добавил замену EVM. Теперь он сравнил свой роадмап 2023 года с новым планом - и это уже не про скорость, а про выживание сети. Виталик поднял пост-квантовую защиту и приватность в главные цели Ethereum. Идея - упростить протокол настолько, чтобы его можно было целиком формально проверить через ИИ. Что поменялось в

10 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC11 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Etherfi: не станет блокировать апгрейд - лучше уйдёт из стейкинга совсем 🤔 😐 Ранее писали как в Ethereum предложили обнулять награды за стейкинг. Теперь по тому же EIP высказался глава ether.fi - и позиция неожиданная. 👇 Etherfi - крупнейший протокол ликвидного стейкинга ETH. Логично было бы ждать что он против апгрейда, но CEO Майк Силагадзе решил иначе: Блокировать EIP не станет - это разрушительный прецедент д

10 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AI: Meta выкатила конкурента Claude Code - дешевле в 20 раз 🔭 😐 Ранее писали как Claude Code перестал спрашивать разрешение на каждое действие. Теперь в тот же рынок залетела Meta - Цукерберг показал Muse Code, свой ответ Claude Code и Codex. И тут есть нюанс. Muse Code - терминальный агент на модели Muse Spark 1.2. Планирует правки, пишет код, гоняет команды и сам проверяет результат. Живёт только в консоли, без G

9 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AI: Claude Code больше не спрашивает разрешения - и это безопаснее 🔭 😐 Ранее писали как Claude Code сам монтирует видео и запускает команды без тебя. Anthropic даёт агенту ещё больше прав - с 14 августа Claude Code по дефолту перестаёт спрашивать разрешение на каждое действие. С конца марта в Claude Code есть auto mode - агент сам решает что запускать, без твоего Yes/No на каждый файл и команду. Теперь его врубают

9 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AI: один AI-аудит - 85 критических дыр в биткоине ⌨️ 😐 Ранее писали как Claude за сутки нашёл в Zcash баг, который аудиторы не видели 4 года. Теперь то же самое поставили на поток - и первую уязвимость уже используют. Bitcoin Red Team - 16 волонтёров на гранте OpenSats натравили топовые AI-модели на код биткоина. За 27.5 часов прогнали 390 репо и выкатили почти 5000 находок. Что накопали: 🟢85 критических дыр, 635

8 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AI: Kaito удваивает аллокации стейкерам - но вход по 5000 sKAITO 🔭 😐 Ранее писали как Kaito запустил Katalyst и стал платить за депозиты. Теперь стейкерам обещают вдвое больше аллокаций - но по факту это клуб для китов. 👇 💰 Инвестиции 10.8 млн$ Kaito - платформа которая анализирует охваты в Х и раздаёт аллокации в новые крипто проекты за стейкинг. Кому достанется больше: 🟢Стейкеры - x2 аллокаций от проектов 🟢От 5

8 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC9 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AI: X убивает revenue sharing - платят только за оригинальный контент 🔭 😐 Ранее писали как Маск выложил код алгоритма X и объявил войну AI-слопу. Теперь от слов перешли к деньгам. 7 августа X закрыл Creator Revenue Sharing и запустил Original Content Rewards. Пассивный доход просто за охваты кончился. Что поменялось: Репосты, копипаста, минимальные правки и AI-слоп больше не приносят денег. Считаются только показы

8 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC8 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AI: фреймворк отдают бесплатно - деньги берут за то чтобы агент жил в проде 🔭 😐 Ранее писали как агент сам покупает данные без тебя и без ключей. LangChain пошёл дальше и продаёт не самого агента, а место где он крутится - Managed Deep Agents вышли в паблик-бету 7 августа. 👇 💰 Инвестиции 125 млн$ при оценке 1.25 ярда LangChain - самый популярный опенсорс-каркас для ИИ-агентов, на нём собран чуть ли не весь рынок.

7 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC14 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

AI: AI-поиск не съел Google - а притащил магазинам новый канал продаж 🔭 😐 Ранее писали как Manus подтянул SEO по промпту. Shopify выкатил первые цифры - и оказалось, что AI-поиск не забирает трафик у Google, а доливает сверху. Shopify - платформа для интернет-магазинов, через неё продают миллионы продавцов. В квартальном отчёте они впервые показали, что бизнесу даёт трафик из ChatGPT, Perplexity и прочих ботов. Чт

7 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

StripChain: публичный сейл по ~$20M FDV, 100% unlock на TGE 🤔 StripChain - кросс-чейн инфраструктура, которая сшивает BTC, ETH, SOL и другие сети в один слой. Юзер задаёт что хочет сделать, а StripChain сам выбирает сеть, маршрут и ликвидность для исполнения. 👇 💰 Инвестиции 10 млн$ - Sora Ventures, Mechanism, Hypersphere, Shima и другие 😐 Ранее писали про проект и предварительные условия. Сегодня открыли публичный

6 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC24 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Инфополе: мемкоин Трампа просят признать рагпулом на $3.81 ярда 🤬 😐 Ранее писали как семья Трампа залутала $2.3 ярда на крипте, пока инвесторы теряли столько же. Дошло до конкретики - два сенатора просят SEC проверить токен $TRUMP на мошенничество. Элизабет Уоррен и Ричард Блументаль отправили письмо в SEC. Формулировки не мягкие - "нелегальный скам", "рагпул" и неосновательное обогащение президента. Что по цифрам

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @CryptoPartyMoney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Party” (@CryptoPartyMoney), 5,080 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoPartyMoney.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.