Channel
@CryptoNewsDeutsch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,784subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001302569578 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoNewsDeutsch |
| Created | 19 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoNewsDeutsch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:59 | 1,784 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 1,783 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 1,784 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:09 | 1,784 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,631 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 4 | 44.4% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 22.2% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💰 #BTC-#UPDATE Der Preis nähert sich dem Widerstandsniveau. Der Plan bleibt wie zuvor einfach. Solange der Preis nicht nachhaltig über dem Widerstandsbereich von 65.100 bis 65.300 US-Dollar bleibt, tendieren wir zu einer abwärts gerichteten Entwicklung. Eine erfolgreiche Konsolidierung über diesem Niveau wäre ein positives Zeichen und würde Long-Positionen begünstigen. In diesem Fall können wir eine Aufwärtsbewegu…
💰 Das Hyperliquid Policy Center fordert die CFTC auf, die US-amerikanische Beteiligung an den dezentralen Märkten für unbefristete Futures zu unterstützen. 🔗 mehr Infos 👈🏽👈🏽👈🏽 #hyperliquid #HypeRocket #Trading 👉🏽 bleib informiert: 🪙 @CryptoNewsDeutsch
🤖 💰 Tom Lee hat gerade live auf CNBC gesagt, dass Quanten-Computer Bitcoin innerhalb von zwei Jahren gefährden könnten. „Bitcoin hat noch keine einheitliche Lösung gefunden, um dies zu verhindern.“ „Das wird kein Problem für Ethereum oder Solana darstellen.“ „Google geht davon aus, dass alle Verschlüsselungen bis 2028 geknackt werden könnten.“ 👉🏽 bleib informiert: 🪙 @CryptoNewsDeutsch
👉🏽 bleib informiert: 🪙 @CryptoNewsDeutsch
💯2
🔵 Die Nachfrage nach Ethereum-Staking spiegelt die Situation von 2023 wider. #ETH Die Staking-Muster ähneln der Phase vor dem Preis-Anstieg, als die Preise von 1.6k$ auf fast 4.900$ stiegen. Analysten deuten auf einen möglichen steilen Anstieg hin, falls sich die Geschichte wiederholt, obwohl ein abschließender Rückgang unter 1.700 US-Dollar vor größeren Gewinnen stattfinden könnte. Historische Muster garantieren …
💰 Jemand hat 500 BTC im Wert von 32 Millionen Dollar für eine Transaktionsgebühr von nur 0,12 Dollar transferiert. Die Magie von Bitcoin ✨ 👉🏽 bleib informiert: 🪙 @CryptoNewsDeutsch
🤖 wer mit Claude (KI) arbeiten will, hier geht es zur Masterclass (in Skool) 🔗 Claude Masterclass beitreten 👈🏽👈🏽👈🏽 #Skool #Werbung #KI #Hilfe #Community 👉🏽 bleib informiert: 🪙 @CryptoNewsDeutsch
🤖 Wenn du Bock hast, auf eine KI-Community (auf Skool), diese findest du hier 👈🏽 [klick] Dort kannst du lernen wie du mit KI Bilder, Videos, Musik usw. erstellst, und bist teil einer transparenten Community! Bitte nur Deutsch-sprachige Anfragen! Keine Translator-Tussen 😜 #Skool #Community #KI #AI #Werbung #lernen 👉🏽 bleib informiert: 🪙 @CryptoNewsDeutsch
💯1
🏦 Coinbase führt den Handel mit fast 4K US-Aktien an 5 von 7 Tagen pro Woche in Großbritannien ein. 🇬🇧 👉🏽 bleib informiert: 🪙 @CryptoNewsDeutsch
💰 #BITCOIN HAT SEIN PATTERN NIUE GEBROCHEN … oder doch? Ändert sich diesmal doch etwas? 👀 Schau dir den Chart an: Jede Cycle-Top, dann der lange Bleed. Die untere Trendlinie? Bitcoin hat sie bisher nie gebrochen. Aber… sind wir diesmal wirklich noch weit weg vom finalen Low? Oder haben wir den Boden schon irgendwo gesehen? Der Plan, der bisher immer funktioniert hat: $64K → $52K → $43K → $29K Klingt logisch. Abe…
🎖Krypto News 🇩🇪🇦🇹🇨🇭deutsch© pinned a photo
🇷🇺 Der russische Präsident Putin hat ein Gesetz unterzeichnet, das eine umfassende Regulierung für digitale Vermögenswerte und Rechte für Investoren vorsieht 👀 „Die Gesetzgebung regelt die Organisation, Buchführung und Verwahrung von digitalen Währungen und ausländischen digitalen Instrumenten.“ 💥 👉🏽 bleib informiert: 🪙 @CryptoNewsDeutsch
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @CryptoNewsDeutsch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎖Krypto News 🇩🇪🇦🇹🇨🇭deutsch©” (@CryptoNewsDeutsch), 1,784 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoNewsDeutsch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.