https://x.com/cryptomastercom/status/2061474837554753950?s=46
🔥3
Signed Tanish Singla

Channel
@CryptoMastersCo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,876subscribers
-67 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001324859383 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoMastersCo |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoMastersCo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 5,876 | -29 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 5,905 | -33 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 5,938 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 5,943 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 5,943 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 23 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 68.6% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 25.7% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 5.71% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2025 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CryptoMastersCo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2025 to 1 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
https://x.com/cryptomastercom/status/2061474837554753950?s=46
🔥3
Signed Tanish Singla
https://x.com/cryptomastercom/status/2059266516387041395
❤6
Signed Tanish Singla
The IMF released a note on tokenized finance, highlighting its potential to transform banking, capital markets, and payments. Without proper policy frameworks and global coordination, however, it warns tokenization could amplify financial instability. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/068/2026/001/068.2026.issue-001-en.xml
❤3🔥2
Signed Tanish Singla
Merry Christmas everyone!! What a strange year. Merry Christmas to the 67 remaining believers. I am hopeful that 2026 favours us more than 2025 did.
❤1
Signed Tanish Singla
State of 2025 Token Launches: Year-in Review • Launches were a bloodbath: 84.7% of 2025 TGEs (100/118) are below their TGE valuation • Drawdowns were extreme + clustered: 65% of tokens are down ≥50% from TGE, and 51% are down ≥70% --> with a clear “graveyard zone” where 38.1% sit at -70% to -90% FDV vs TGE • The bigger the launch, the worse it performed: 28 tokens debuted ≥$1B FDV → 0% are in the green • Category ta…
❤1
Signed Tanish Singla
Crypto Masters Wishes you Happy Diwali 🪔! Wishing you a prosperous Diwali filled with the joy of crypto gains and the warmth of blockchain success! यह दिवाली आपके जीवन में शांति और समृद्धि लेकर आए।
❤4
Signed Tanish Singla
https://vxtwitter.com/bnbchain/status/1977735058652791123?s=46&t=2q9OLMlaobNlHLewOXT4uA BNB airdrop before PUMP airdrop is crazy
❤2
Signed Tanish Singla
https://x.com/bnbchain/status/1977735058652791123?s=46
Signed Tanish Singla
new ฿ all time high: $125,780
Signed Tanish Singla
https://x.com/cryptomastercom/status/1973602805785964758
🔥1
Signed Tanish Singla
https://x.com/cryptomastercom/status/1971768820659540464?s=46
❤3
Signed Tanish Singla
OMFDOGS - Eth | $DOGS Inspired by the viral OMFGDOGS meme that swept the internet since the early 2010s, OMFDOGS captures the wild, hilarious energy of those iconic doge reaction images paired with the classic “OMFG” expression. OMFGDOGS became a staple in meme culture for its absurd and over-the-top reaction faces, making it one of the most recognizable and beloved dog-based memes online. Now, it’s back this ti…
❤1
Signed Tanish Singla
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CryptoMastersCo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Masters” (@CryptoMastersCo), 5,876 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoMastersCo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.