5 measurements spanning 20 days, net +48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 866–928 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 12:26
921
+12
20 Aug 2026, 18:46
909
+14
14 Aug 2026, 04:08
895
+21
7 Aug 2026, 19:26
874
+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:33
873
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.9%
avg views ÷ 921 subscribers
Avg views / post
239
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
13 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
3,106
Reactions total
115
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
115 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
72
62.6%
❤
34
29.6%
🔥
4
3.48%
👏
2
1.74%
🙏
2
1.74%
💯
1
0.87%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️ Bitcoin: Was nun?! (UPDATE)
🔸 Wir haben noch keinen Strukturbruch gesehen und sind in unserer fallenden Seitwärtsphase, Bitcoin kämpft für einen höheren Hochpunkt
🔸 Ethereum bewegt sich stabil in der Seitwährtszone die wir gestern im Stream analysiert haben, ein Breakout steht bevor
🔸 Der S&P 500 Trade erreicht seinen TP1 - Glückwunsch! Wir sind genau wie besprochen ans 0.50 Fibonacci Level gefallen: 0.82% Prof…
🔴 Wir sind Live - Freunde!
Bitcoin an der Widerstandszone, Seasonality-Chart läuft wie am Schnürchen. Jetzt live reinschauen 👇
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lhtk4y5F4Q4
Bitcoin folgt gerade fast exakt seinem Seasonality-Muster – und steht jetzt direkt an der Widerstandszone um $65.000. Die Aufwärtstrendlinie hält bisher wie eine Schnur. Ob der Ausbruch klappt, checken wir gleich live 👇
Wir starten um 13 Uhr auf YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lhtk4y5F4Q4
🔴 Wir sind Live - Freunde!
Aktienmarkt feiert Rekordhoch, Bitcoin bleibt stur bei $64000k-64500k stehen. Jetzt live dabei sein und die Diskrepanz verstehen 👇
https://www.youtube.com/live/XjEMcrDvzDw?is=QKjdSFiCDC63o7-C
💥Rekordhoch beim S&P 500 – und ein sauberer Ausbruch aus dem Widerstand obendrauf!
Bitcoin schaut sich das von der Seitenlinie an und klebt weiter bei $64.000 bis $64.500. Diese Diskrepanz nehmen wir gleich im Stream auseinander 👇
Wir starten um 13 Uhr auf YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/live/XjEMcrDvzDw?is=QKjdSFiCDC63o7-C
⚠️ Bitcoin: Kommt diese Woche der CLARITY ACT?! 📈
Hi Freunde!
🔸 Bitcoin steht aktuell am Widerstand unseres Trendkanals. Der kurzfristige bärische Trend ist immer noch im Takt & bis wir diese Struktur nicht brechen können wir weiterhin von Seitwärtsfallenden Preisbewegungen ausgehen.
🔸 Wir haben nur noch 3 Tage bis zur Sommerpause des US Senats, falls der Clarity Act bestätigt wird muss dies sehr zeitnah passieren…
Bitcoin: DIE NEUE WOCHE! ⚠️
Guten Morgen Freunde! Bitcoin macht exakt was wir gestern Abend im Livestream besprochen haben:
• Wir sind am Widerstand gescheitert und sehen eine leicht fallende Seitwärtsbewegung - warum?
-> The Trend is your friend, Tiefere Tiefpunkte + Tiefere Hochpunkte sind eine klare (kurzfristige) bärische Struktur
• Historisch gesehen ist der 3 August ebenfalls ein negativer Tag, die Korrekt…
⚠️ Beim Bitcoin tut sich aktuell nicht viel, der wichtigste Chart auf den ich aktuell schaue, let's wait for a Breakout aus dem Trendkanal! 🤝🏻
👍8👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @CryptoMarkeyCommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 252,867 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoMarkus” (@CryptoMarkeyCommunity), 921 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoMarkeyCommunity.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.