Channel
@CryptoInsiderGG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,355subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002179819587 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoInsiderGG |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoInsiderGG |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 1,355 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 1,356 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:20 | 1,357 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 1,357 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
21 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 42.9% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 38.1% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 9.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 27 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📉 Gm Insiders! ☕️Let's look at today's market overview! Despite three consecutive days of BTC and ETH ETF inflows, the bounce didn’t last long, and crypto has already given back almost all of its gains. Bitcoin: $67,616 -1% Ethereum: $2,034 -2% Thursday ETF inflows: BTC: $254M ETH: $7M Despite weakness in the majors, the same alts continue to outperform. DCR gained another 16% in the past 24 hours and is up 45%…
🥰6🔥2
Gm Insiders! ☕️Let's look at today's market overview! For the first time in a while, we saw another strong bounce in the majors, followed by large ETF inflows and CEX accumulation. ETH reclaimed the $2K support level, while BTC is still struggling to break above $70K. Bitcoin: $68,213 +5% Ethereum: $2,065 +9.5% Wednesday ETF inflows: BTC: $507M ETH: $157M As the market shows strong momentum, we’re seeing coins …
❤3
Gm Insiders! ☕️Let's look at today's market overview! For the first time in a while, we saw a bounce in crypto, with almost all major coins in the green, while U.S. stocks and metals posted even stronger gains. Bitcoin: $64,950 +3% Ethereum: $1,890 +3.6% Tuesday ETF inflows: BTC: $258M ETH: $9M With strong interest in AI agents, related coins are showing the most strength in the market bounce: KITE up 21%, fol…
🥰2❤1
📉 Gm Insiders! ☕️Let's look at today's market overview! As the decline continues, Bitcoin is now testing a zone it hasn’t seen since October 2024, with no signs of an imminent market bounce. Bitcoin: $63,269 -4% Ethereum: $1,827 -3% Monday ETF outflows: BTC: $204M ETH: $50M Meanwhile, after a brief cooldown, PIPPIN printed another +8% leg in a day, followed by DCR +3% and PI +2%. Despite a few runners, altcoin ma…
👍2❤1
📉 Gm Insiders! ☕️Let's look at today's market overview! Despite the market bouncing a bit on Friday after news that the tariffs were canceled, those gains were erased and we fell even further after Trump announced global tariffs on all countries. Bitcoin: $65,825 -3.2% Ethereum: $1,884 -5% Last week ETF outflows: BTC: $316M ETH: $123M Some alts still managed to rally, mostly on positive news. MORPHO is up 11% t…
📉 Gm Insiders! ☕️Let's look at today's market overview! From the start of the year, the crypto market has already fallen 20%, and open interest has dropped dramatically. Despite indicators suggesting we should hold, there don’t seem to be any buyers at all. Bitcoin: $67,128 -1.5% Ethereum: $1,979 -2% Wednesday ETF outflows: BTC: $133M ETH: $42M In the last 24 hours, we’ve had zero crypto gainers, while coins like…
📉 Gm Insiders! ☕️Let's look at today's market overview! After the 17% crypto market-cap crash in early February, traders turned risk-off, while nearly all CEXs and DEXs continue to record spot-volume outflows. Bitcoin: $67,819 -1% Ethereum: $2,003 +1% Tuesday ETF flows: BTC: $105M outflowed ETH: $49M inflowed According to CryptoRank’s Coin Discovery data, the best-performing sectors over the past 30 days are To…
📉Gm Insiders! ☕️Let's look at today's market overview! As we’ve stayed in fear almost since November 2025, crypto has not shown any significant move, trading in a very tight range for weeks now. Bitcoin: $68,145 -1% Ethereum: $1,975 -0.1% STABLE continues to head in the opposite direction of the broader market, gaining another 13% in a day on positive sentiment. Also, privacy coins saw a small bounce, with XMR u…
📉 Gm Insiders! ☕️Let's look at today's market overview! Since Bitcoin can’t break through the $70K resistance, the market is still in the red, despite active whale accumulation. Still, it’s been a month since the ETH and BTC ETFs last saw inflows. Bitcoin: $68,482 -3% Ethereum: $1,969 -6% Last week ETF outflows: BTC: $360M ETH: $161M While majors struggle, PIPPIN keeps trending upward, gaining another 157% this…
📉 Gm Insiders! ☕️Let's look at today's market overview! As we saw a sell-off in the U.S. stock market, crypto also slid a bit but showed more strength. That could mean the coins have finally found a bottom. Bitcoin: $66,685 -0.6% Ethereum: $1,957 -0.4% Thursday ETF outflows: BTC: $410M ETH: $113M Altcoins keep bouncing one after another on positive news: KITE gained 18% in a day, followed by H +14%, RIVER +13%…
📉 Gm Insiders! ☕️Let's look at today's market overview! Capital continues to flow out of crypto as major coins slide back toward recent lows. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF assets under management fell to $97.31B, down from $110.92B a week earlier. Bitcoin: $66,861 -3% Ethereum: $1,947 -3% Thursday ETF inflows: BTC: $167M ETH: $14M PIPPIN continues its run, up 35% on the day, followed by a 25% pump in RIVER and a 15% bo…
📉 Gm Insiders! ☕️Let's look at today's market overview! The market still can’t find a bottom and is giving back most gains after short-term bounces, while extreme fear is again at its lowest levels since summer 2022. However, daily ETF inflows have resumed, and if they remain consistent, they could greatly help to gain momentum. Bitcoin: $69,000 -2.4% Ethereum: $2,010 -3.5% Monday ETF inflows: BTC: $145M ETH: $57M…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoInsiderGG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 97,646 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Insider” (@CryptoInsiderGG), 1,355 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoInsiderGG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.