Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Crypto Family Trading

@CryptoFamilyTrading

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,455subscribers

-42 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001107733859
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoFamilyTrading
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 April 2018— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoFamilyTrading

Growth

12,45512,49712,4766 August 2026 — 12,497 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,497 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,494 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,493 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,483 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,476 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,466 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,455 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,449–12,503 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:4312,455-11
11 Aug 2026, 15:4212,466-10
10 Aug 2026, 15:5812,476-7
9 Aug 2026, 18:2512,483-10
8 Aug 2026, 15:2112,493-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:0112,494-3
6 Aug 2026, 17:1512,497no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:5912,497first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8088.9%
🔥77.78%
👏22.22%
👍11.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2025 to 17 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Feb 2026, 02:13 UTC≈2,960 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Chúc năm Bính Ngọ anh em trade đâu thắng đó, hold là lên, vào lệnh là có lãi 💸 📈 Kèo nào cũng xanh 💰 Tài khoản tăng trưởng đều 🧠 Tâm lý vững vàng – quản lý vốn chặt chẽ 🔥 Bắt đúng sóng, chốt lời đúng đỉnh Cùng nhau bứt phá mạnh mẽ trong năm mới nhé anh em! 🚀💎 #CryptoFamilyTrading

17

5 Feb 2026, 20:45 UTC≈2,560 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Sáng nay có post bài hi vọng anh em xem được. #Bitcoin đang 63k

4

5 Feb 2026, 03:05 UTC≈2,380 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Bitcoin update Sau khi lực bán mạnh thì hiện tại đang có 2 FVG khá cứng và chưa có lực buy trở lại Dòng tiền cứ giảm tự do từ 115k,,anh em nên chờ đến khi có lực mua trở lại trước khi chụp dao. Để chắc chắc thì nên có mô hình đảo chiều tăng giá như khi #bitcoin tích lũy và break 16k như ảnh.

10

30 Jan 2026, 15:45 UTC≈2,290 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Trump chọn Kevin Warsh kế nhiệm Jerome Powell làm Chủ tịch #Fed.🔥

1🔥1

29 Jan 2026, 06:25 UTC≈2,070 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Vàng và bạc đã được giao dịch trên #Binance và đang pumb test đỉnh.🔥

1

3 Jan 2026, 09:49 UTC≈2,860 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ông Trump: 'Mỹ đã bắt Tổng thống Venezuela' Đầu gấu muốn là bắt thôi.

5

1 Jan 2026, 22:04 UTC≈2,170 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Chúc mừng năm mới anh em crypto 🎉🪙 Chúc chart xanh miên man 📈 Vào lệnh chuẩn, chốt lời đỉnh, ví lúc nào cũng đầy 💰🚀 Anh em mở bát 2026 chưa? 😂

4👏2

16 Dec 2025, 13:05 UTC≈2,820 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Sau hơn 2 tháng kể từ khi #BTC đạt đỉnh 126k thì đã giảm -34% ,hiện tại đang quanh 87k. Anh em tình hình ví ổn hum? Theo như chart dài hạn thì #btc muốn tiếp tục tăng cần phá vỡ 2 #FVG gần nhất là 97k và cao hơn 117k. Cứ tiếp tục giảm xong test lại không phá vỡ rồi lại giảm tiếp thì sớm muộn cũng về kiếm #FVG ở dưới là vùng 50k. Còn theo như chỉ báo #Rsi thì lực mua nó đang giảm và tạo mô hình 3 đỉnh. Nếu muốn tăn

3🔥2👍1

3 Oct 2025, 16:24 UTC≈3,480 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#BTC đang trên đường phá cản 🔥 123.000$ đã phá vỡ.

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CryptoFamilyTrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 209,583 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ICO SPEAKS NEWS
@icospeaksnews · 314,250
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Family Trading” (@CryptoFamilyTrading), 12,455 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoFamilyTrading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.