Channel
@CryptoEaterITA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
604subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002104362585 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoEaterITA |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoEaterITA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:23 | 604 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 606 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:04 | 609 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 609 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,392 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
27 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍌 | 15 | 55.6% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
41 views e solo 6 banane? Raga, per dare la reaction basta un click sulla banana: a voi non costa un cazzo, ma per noi scimmie vale molto. Se poi siete tipi da comprare due banane per mangiarne una sola... beh, de gustibus. Cliccate 'sta banana e sblocchiamo il link! MANCANO meno di 24ore
Crypto Eater pinned a photo
#THESAVIOR I VECCHI CEX, IL KYC E IL DEGRADO FINANZIARIO MODERNO Ve li ricordate i CEX di una volta? Quando Bastavano una mail usa e getta, una password e un’inclinazione naturale al rischio per entrare nel mercato. Niente selfie con il documento in mano, niente video dove devi girare la testa come un fesso, niente bollette della luce da inviare per dimostrare che esisti. Solo noi, il grafico e la liquidità. Oggi?…
🍌15
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣2😁1
Ah quindi i CEX nokyc non vi interessano?
GM che rapporto avete con il KYC?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
https://cryptoquant.com/insights/quicktake/6a71c4c17a45a75a9468e524-USDT-Market-Cap-Decline-Reaches-Historically-Extreme-Levels?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=sns&utm_campaign=quicktake&utm_content=morenodv
👍1
#SECONDACT #Hack 13.323 wallet collegati a Coldcard presumibilmente colpiti in un'operazione di svuotamento di massa Un attore di un forum sostiene di aver condotto nell'agosto 2026 un'operazione di drain di criptovalute puntando a wallet descritti come associati a dispositivi Coldcard Q1 e MK4. Il registro dell'operazione pubblicato conterrebbe: * 8.716 seed phrase recuperate * 13.323 indirizzi Bitcoin * Circ…
Video, posted without a caption
https://x.com/i/status/2084683373042077827
#ADV NOVITÀ: Bitvavo ha introdotto il Wallet Web3 direttamente nell'app. Per chi usa già l'exchange cambia parecchio, perché fino ad oggi Bitvavo era principalmente il posto dove comprare, vendere e fare Earn. Adesso invece puoi anche avere un wallet self-custody senza uscire dall'ecosistema. Per capirci: le crypto nel wallet sono sotto il tuo controllo. Hai una seed phrase da custodire e puoi interagire con il mon…
❤1
Il sell the news di Ironwood sembra essere terminato. Il range è con lo scorso top locale, dobbiamo prima affrontare e confermare quest'ultimo per tornare a prezzi vicino all'ATH. La pazienza è una virtù dai frutti inestimabili, ma richiede una disciplina interiore che pochi riescono ad assimilare davvero.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CryptoEaterITA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
GM che rapporto avete con il KYC?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Eater” (@CryptoEaterITA), 604 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoEaterITA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.