Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,771. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 15,136β17,439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 10:46
15,402
-35
9 Nov 2026, 15:49
15,437
-17
8 Nov 2026, 08:11
15,454
-21
7 Nov 2026, 04:07
15,475
-10
6 Nov 2026, 05:01
15,485
-12
5 Nov 2026, 01:19
15,497
-15
3 Nov 2026, 22:59
15,512
-9
2 Nov 2026, 20:54
15,521
-9
1 Nov 2026, 22:39
15,530
-21
31 Oct 2026, 21:35
15,551
-12
30 Oct 2026, 23:07
15,563
-23
29 Oct 2026, 20:39
15,586
-15
28 Oct 2026, 21:15
15,601
-26
27 Oct 2026, 17:00
15,627
-16
26 Oct 2026, 18:11
15,643
-18
25 Oct 2026, 16:59
15,661
-12
24 Oct 2026, 18:49
15,673
-13
23 Oct 2026, 15:44
15,686
-22
22 Oct 2026, 17:36
15,708
-13
21 Oct 2026, 12:39
15,721
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
44.3%
avg views Γ· 15,402 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,820
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.744%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
49 (21 July 2026 β 12 November 2026)
Views total
88,620
Reactions total
659
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 07:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
61
Videos
1
Links
3
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 13 November 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,938 reactions across 49 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 1,938 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegramβs own βeditedβ marker: 3 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (23.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Canaan is considering selling more of its Bitcoin to fund stock buybacks.
The Bitcoin mining hardware manufacturer has launched a $20 million share repurchase programme as revenue from mining rigs reportedly plunges 96%.
There's an interesting shift happening here.
A company built around Bitcoin mining may now be selling more of its BTC to support its own stock price.
And with most of its Bitcoin holdings alreadyβ¦
BREAKING: $NVDA is up over 5% in premarket, recovering most of yesterdayβs 5.47% drop.
CoreWeave, one of Nvidiaβs biggest chip buyers, just raised its 2026 revenue forecast, a sign AI demand for Nvidia chips is still strong.
BREAKING: $NVDA crashes 8% at market open as news of CEO Jensen Huang's affair with a suspected Chinese spy hits the market.
$1.05 trillion has been added to US stocks today, while Nvidia alone has lost $361 billion in market value.
It looks like money is rotating out of Nvidia and into the rest of the market.
π¨ALERT: Investors pulled $1.44 BILLION from BlackRockβs Bitcoin ETF $IBIT alone over six straight trading days.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $1.92B in net outflows from Oct. 30 through Nov. 6.
On Friday, IBIT accounted for $403M of the $411.9 million in net outflows.
Fidelityβs FBTC was the only fund with inflows, adding $42.8M.
The streak points to WEAKER investor confidence.
Institutions may be trimming Bitcoin β¦
MEXC is facing US financial restrictions over alleged money laundering activity.
FinCEN says the exchange processed at least $16 BILLION linked to sanctions evasion, cybercrime and other illicit activity between May 2021 and May 2026.
Nearly $1.5 BILLION was allegedly tied to Russian sanctions evasion.
A major regulatory development for the crypto exchange industry. π
πΊπΈ INSIGHT: Bitcoin has gained an average median return of 63% in the 12 months following every US midterm election since 2010, according to CryptoQuant.
BTC rose 36.8% after the 2014 midterms, 45.8% after 2018, and 80.8% after 2022.
However, CryptoQuant warns the pattern may reflect Bitcoinβs four-year halving cycle rather than election results, with 2026 showing a different trend.
βΌοΈ BIG: Tether holds about 150,000 BTC worth $11.5 BILLION, CEO Paolo Ardoino reveals.
That tops every public company on BitcoinTreasuriesβ list except Strategy, which holds 849,327 BTC, about 5.7 times as much.
Privately held Tether sits outside the ranking.
The figure is roughly 50,000 BTC above its reported USDT reserve holdings.
Separate proprietary investments could explain the gap, but Ardoino did not clariβ¦
China is putting another $81B into its financial system.
The central bank carried out 541 billion yuan in overnight reverse repo operations at 1.25%, adding short-term liquidity to the market.
Global liquidity remains a key factor for risk assets, including crypto.
Gold might have just discovered its own infinite mint bug.
A US fusion startup claims it has successfully turned mercury into gold using nuclear transmutation.
If this technology ever becomes commercially viable, it raises a fascinating question:
What happens to gold's value if its supply is no longer as scarce as we thought?
Bitcoin has a major advantage here.
There will only ever be 21 million BTC. Nobody can β¦
Binance claims 90% of the shortfall following the hack has been covered. π
β’ CEO commits to fulfilling remaining 10%
β’ Proof of Reserves updated after exploit
β’ Wallet balance shows 692,489 BTC
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @CryptoDecodedHQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @CryptoDecodedHQ as deleted β posts this register held that were missing from the channelβs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelβs public page, and when β not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
30 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
30 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
10 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βCrypto Decoded π§ β (@CryptoDecodedHQ), 15,402 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoDecodedHQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.