Channel
@CryptoChocolated
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002521597159 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoChocolated |
| Description | Владелец: @cash_gap Открыт к сотрудничеству. Владелец не несет ответственности за рекламные посты и ссылки в канале. |
| Created | 16 April 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoChocolated |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 18 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 18 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 16 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (16 April 2025 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
44 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5395732581780040886 | 9 | 20.5% | |
| custom 5274195706066781810 | 6 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5343726841427405712 | 6 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5273842895978251304 | 5 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5307576466769193020 | 4 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5456378804194781781 | 3 | 6.82% | |
| 🙉 | 3 | 6.82% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 4.55% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.27% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 2.27% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 2 months. If they remain inactive for the next 30 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Chocolate Crypto pinned «Выведем блоки втб альфа сбер условия :Фото паспорта, номер телефона привязанный к карте и номер карты связь @tradebnb05»
Выведем блоки втб альфа сбер условия :Фото паспорта, номер телефона привязанный к карте и номер карты связь @tradebnb05
Chocolate Crypto pinned «Всех приветствуем, рады сообщить положительную новость! Снова доступен вывод с Альфа Банк на 3-е лицо 🏦 💳 Пока только в пределах Москвы, по причине личного присутствия дропа Связь: @tradebnb05 @lowgBi»
Всех приветствуем, рады сообщить положительную новость! Снова доступен вывод с Альфа Банк на 3-е лицо 🏦 💳 Пока только в пределах Москвы, по причине личного присутствия дропа Связь: @tradebnb05 @lowgBi
Нужны дроповоды 18+ мск адекватные связь @lowgBi
Заберу сберы мск личная встреча возраст любой связь @lowgBi
Снимем любые средства с 115 фз с любых банков на 3-е лицо только с присутствием дропа в офисе , либо по доверке % обговаривается связь @lowgBi
🤑BTC - 110.000💵
custom 53437268414274057123
⚡️ Закон о лимите на переводы до 100 000₽ для дропов С 15 мая вступает в силу новый закон, ограничивающий возможности дропов, находящихся в базе данных Банка России, по выводу и обналичиванию средств. Исходя из закона, ясно, что не каждая карта дропа будет ограничена, а только те карты, которые попали в список специальной базы. Базу формируют на основе сведений от банков обо всех случаях и попытках мошенничества, …
Поправки ужесточающие ответственность по статье 187 сегодня внесли в Государственную Думу! Шкала наказаний: 1. Простая передача карты (даже без участия в мошенничестве): 📝 Штраф 100-300 тыс. руб. 📝 Обязательные работы до 480 часов 📝 Ограничение свободы до 2 лет 2. Проведение операций по указанию мошенников: 📝 Те же санкции, что и за передачу карты 3. Организация "карточных схем": 📝 Штраф до 1 млн руб. 📝 Принудител…
⚠️ ТЕПЕРЬ МОЖНО ПЛАТИТЬ КРИПТОЙ в магазинах и не только! На территории РФ 🇷🇺 ➡️Курс не самый сочный, но терпимо. https://t.me/antarctic_wallet_bot/app?startapp=ref_cf05b8f7c8 Оплачивай товары криптой за 5 секунд! 🐧 С Antarctic Wallet крипта работает на тебя и вместе с тобой. Подключайся, приглашай друзей и зарабатывай!
custom 52741957060667818101custom 53437268414274057121custom 53957325817800408861
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CryptoChocolated. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@CryptoChocolated named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chocolate Crypto” (@CryptoChocolated), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoChocolated.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.