Channel
@CryptoChainNFT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
161subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001642224534 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoChainNFT |
| Description | Заработал чуть больше чем потерял owner - @ChainRoman chat - @chat_chain |
| Created | 19 May 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoChainNFT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 161 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 161 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 19 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
49 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 61.2% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 32.7% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 2.04% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.04% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2022 to 31 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я вышел с Node Farm💻 В подобных сервисах, доверие базируется на репутации овнеров, поэтому считаю важным уведомить вас, что я больше не причастен к проекту. Для меня это получилась история не о деньгах, но о большом опыте, который уже сейчас приносит плоды. Оставляю работающий проект приносящий прибыль команде и желаю удачи в дальнейшем развитии!
👍11
Скор на бласте???🤯 альфа фарм поинтов💥 BlastScore а ещё, есть рафл на роль в BlastScore на платформе 0xScore
👍4🐳1
0xScore.pro Вынесли аттестацию в linea отдельным продуктом, за 0.0007 ETH ~ 1.5usdt
https://linea.build/apps Первые в дапсах на сайте linea
⚡️0xScore X Linea⚡️ Уверено двигаем вперёд 0xScore, сегодня за анонсили колабу с Linea. Готовим крупное обновление и больше пратнёрств, ты всё ещё можешь быть ёрли - 0xScore Рад быть частью команды🤝
👍7🔥1
🤡WalletConnect блокнул ru IP🤡 Кто не в курсе, это самый популярный провайдер для конекта кошельков на сайте. Сегодня в обед они просто начали блочить всех с UA или RU ip, из-за этого конект на сайтах перестал работать, если не было альтернативной реализации, мы в огне просто всё это фиксим. Спустя несколько часов UA ip уже не банили, а ру и дальше сидят в бане без возможности конекта. Самое веселое, что адекватной а…
🔥6
Завод на котором я работал последние пару месяцев
0xScore - НОВЫЙ СПОСОБ ВЕБ3 РЕПУТАЦИИ Здарова криптаны, вот и выходит проект релиз которого я ждал больше чем чего либо ❤️ В этот проект мы вложили много сил, ресурсов и что главное - душу! Девы кодили без сна, я потратил несколько месяцев на изучение кучи новых вещей, построение нетворкинга и наверно то что получилось - это мой Magnum opus, то есть та работа к которой я шел весь свой крипто-путь. "Серп ты заебал…
🔥6👎1
Децентрализации WAX Мои опасения по поводу некой централизации вакса успешно прошли проверку и теперь безусловно можно говорить о том, что наши джепеги на ваксе не отберут каким бы вы способом их не получили. Хотя формально все нфт используют один контракт, к которому имеют доступ создатели атомикхаб, а все переводы ваксов проходят тоже через один аккаунт и в теории они могут их блокнуть, сами разрабы публично заявл…
👍8💩1
Приветствую всех, на связи Чейн Многие из вас знают меня по каналам(тык) и множестве чатов, отс и тд, которые прекратили свою деятельность по причине того, что я не хочу делать рерайт\копипаст паблик, потому что это не создает абсолютно никакой ценности. Я в крипте год и в пиковые времена рынка мой банк был 500к$(сейчас около 150к$), а начинал я со 100$. С самого начала пути я осознано сосредоточил свои силы на WAX …
🔥3
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @CryptoChainNFT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 364,904 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чейн” (@CryptoChainNFT), 161 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoChainNFT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.