Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CryptoBuja

@CryptoBuja

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003490441692
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoBuja
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 8 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/CryptoBuja

Growth

812 Aug 2026, 09:48 — 8 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 14:34 — 8 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 09:4812 Aug 2026, 14:34
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:348no change
12 Aug 2026, 09:488first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

30 May 2026, 17:32 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 2 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

9 May 2026, 11:00 UTCviews —

The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 2 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

13 Jan 2026, 00:01 UTC45 viewsread 12 August 2026

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📰 News: @BujaNews (KR) | @BujaNewsEng (EN) 📊 Analysis: @CryptoBuja (Here) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

13 Jan 2026, 00:01 UTC43 viewsread 12 August 2026

비트코인이 9만1000달러대에서 횡보하며 기관의 강한 매수심과 규제 기대감 사이에서 방향성을 잃고 있습니다. 현재 비트코인은 91181달러(국내 134605000원)에서 24시간 0.4% 상승했으나 움직임이 제한적입니다. 업비트와 빗썸 모두 약 0% 대의 변동률을 보이며 시장이 경직되어 있습니다. 김치프리미엄은 1.19%로 낮은 수준인데, 이는 국내 수요가 글로벌 대비 약하다는 신호입니다. 24시간 거래량은 47조 달러 수준으로 평년 규모이며, 시가총액은 1.82조 달러입니다. 공포탐욕지수가 26(극도의 공포)에 머물러 있어 심리적 취약성이 여전합니다. 뉴스는 엇갈린 신호를 주고 있습니다. 긍정적으로는 트럼프 행정부의 비트코인 국가 전략자산 매입 가능성, 미 재무장관 베센트의 전략적 비트코인 준비금 구축 발표, 모건스탠리의 비트코인·솔라나

13 Jan 2026, 00:01 UTC17 viewsread 12 August 2026

Bitcoin is stuck in a holding pattern at $91,181, essentially flat over the last 24 hours with just a 0.40% gain. The market's treading water while Washington figures out what comes next with crypto policy, and institutional players are making calculated moves rather than aggressive ones. The real story this morning is the tug of war between genuine positive catalysts and real execution concerns. On one side, you've

12 Jan 2026, 00:01 UTC11 viewsread 12 August 2026

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📰 News: @BujaNews (KR) | @BujaNewsEng (EN) 📊 Analysis: @CryptoBuja (Here) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

12 Jan 2026, 00:01 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026

비트코인이 9만 달러 근처에서 소폭 상승하며 횡보장을 이어가고 있습니다. 국내 시장도 동조하면서 조용한 아침장을 형성 중입니다. 현재 비트코인은 90,830달러에서 24시간 0.48% 상승했습니다. 국내 업비트는 133,798,000원으로 글로벌 환산가 대비 1.08%의 김치프리미엄을 유지 중인데, 이는 국내 강세가 약해진 상태입니다. 빗썸은 133,761,000원으로 업비트와 37,000원 정도 차이나며 가격 괴리가 크지 않은 편입니다. 시가 기준으로 전일 대비 상승 모멘텀이 약한 상황이고, 24시간 거래대금도 업비트 56조 원, 빗썸 27조 원으로 활발하지 않습니다. 시가총액은 1.8조 달러 수준으로 안정적이지만, 24시간 거래량 19조 원대는 시장 관심이 분산된 신호입니다. 알트코인 시장은 혼조 패턴을 보이고 있습니다. 이더리움이 1

12 Jan 2026, 00:01 UTC11 viewsread 12 August 2026

Bitcoin is stuck in a narrow range while fear sentiment is hitting extreme lows, signaling capitulation but not yet triggering the reversal move. Bitcoin sits at $90,830 globally with barely any movement—just 0.48% up in 24 hours. In Korea, Upbit shows ₩133.798 million with a trivial 0.07% gain, while Bithumb tracks slightly higher at ₩133.761 million with 0.26% upside. The Kimchi Premium sits at 1.08%, which is raz

11 Jan 2026, 00:00 UTC7 viewsread 12 August 2026

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📰 News: @BujaNews (KR) | @BujaNewsEng (EN) 📊 Analysis: @CryptoBuja (Here) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

11 Jan 2026, 00:00 UTC7 viewsread 12 August 2026

비트코인이 9만 달러대 초반에서 박스권을 그리고 있습니다. 국내는 김치프리미엄 1.33%로 글로벌 대비 약세를 보이는 중입니다. 비트코인은 어제보다 0.13% 하락해 90,391달러에서 움직이고 있고, 국내 현물은 업비트 133,537,000원, 빗썸 133,420,000원으로 양 거래소 간 117,000원 정도의 가격차를 유지 중입니다. 업비트 거래대금이 37.8억 달러로 빗썸의 16.6억 달러 대비 2배 이상 집중된 상황인데, 이는 국내 기관과 개인의 관심이 여전히 업비트에 쏠려있다는 신호입니다. 시가 133,503,000원 대비 현재가가 거의 변하지 않은 점, 그리고 고저가 폭이 57,000원에 불과한 것으로 봐서 오늘 충분한 방향성을 잡지 못했다고 봅니다. 글로벌 24시간 거래량 13.9조 달러는 평년 수준으로, 거래 참여자들이 신중

11 Jan 2026, 00:00 UTC8 viewsread 12 August 2026

Bitcoin holding just above $90k as fear sentiment persists, with Korean markets showing minimal premium despite global weakness continuing to press on altcoins. Bitcoin sits at $90,391 globally, barely budging with a minus 0.13% change over 24 hours. In Korea, Upbit's at 133.537 million won while Bithumb trails slightly at 133.42 million won—a negligible spread that tells you there's no real panic buying or selling.

10 Jan 2026, 00:01 UTC9 viewsread 12 August 2026

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📰 News: @BujaNews (KR) | @BujaNewsEng (EN) 📊 Analysis: @CryptoBuja (Here) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoBuja. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 196,563 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CryptoBuja” (@CryptoBuja), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoBuja.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.