Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CRYPTO BOSS CALLS

@CryptoBossCalls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,967subscribers

-71 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001469936297
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoBossCalls
DescriptionSERVICE ✅AMA ✅Giveaway ✅Promos ✅WL https://x.com/CryptoBossCalls Private:- https://t.me/+NXahywX76hdhMTFl Lounge :- @BOSSCALLSCHAT Our Gamble:- @Cryptobossgamble OWNER:- @Mg_23077 Marketer :- @Garryboss12 #DYOR #NFA
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoBossCalls

Growth

4,9675,0385,002.57 August 2026 — 5,038 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,038 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,020 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,967 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,956–5,049 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:354,967-53
7 Aug 2026, 18:205,020-18
7 Aug 2026, 02:155,038no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:075,038first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.3%
avg views ÷ 4,967 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total9,140
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,160
Videos
230
Links
1,710

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

307 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🌚7524.4%
6621.5%
🐳5116.6%
🔥4314.0%
💘3110.1%
🥰144.56%
103.26%
🦄92.93%
👍41.30%
👏20.651%
😍20.651%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 307reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC720 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔥 We are actively printing in my @CryptoBossGamble Wait...last dip will come on October 10th as per 4 cycle, 2 months to go. @Mg_23077

🔥9🐳2🦄2🥰1

Signed M G || @CryptoBossCalls

4 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC716 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: x40! ☄️ @CryptoBossGamble made a x40+ call on Robinhood Dog. $176K ➡️ $7.3M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Catch plays like this early with SpyDefi Filters!

🌚8🔥2🦄2🐳1

Signed M G || @CryptoBossCalls

22 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC987 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

15 days to pass...biggest crypto revolutionary bill South Korea, Russia, Japan already passed crypto bill and investing, USA already going late now. USA always dreamed to lead in crypto...let's see what happens...even bill didn't pass, it'll harm #btc temporarily. 🔥 "If clarity didn't passed, president Trump will be accountable for that.....he will be remembered as worst president for our crypto"

11🌚2🔥2🐳1

Signed M G || @CryptoBossCalls

22 Jul 2026, 14:25 UTC977 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Senate has 15 days to pass the Crypto Clarity Act before leaving for summer recess. @WatcherGuru

8🔥3🌚2🐳1

Signed M G || @CryptoBossCalls

19 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC≈1,640 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🗓 19 Day Report @CryptoBossGamble 📞 Total Calls: 100 ⚖️ Consistency: 45% 📊 Average Marketcap: $245K 🔗 Favoured Chain: ROBINHOOD 👑 Two wolves ➡️ X31.7 $119K to $3.8M 2️⃣ HoodKitty ➡️ X21.5 $75K to $1.6M 3️⃣ Robinhood Dog ➡️ X13.9 $176K to $2.4M 4️⃣ Ski Mask Brian ➡️ X13.8 $16K to $225K 5️⃣ MarketMint ➡️ X12.4 $195K to $2.4M 6️⃣ HOPPY ➡️ X11.9 $392K to $4.7M 7️⃣ Fearless Of Missing Out ➡️ X11.1 $117K to $1.3M 8️⃣ Oki

🐳8🌚42💘2

Signed M G || @CryptoBossCalls

15 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC≈2,160 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Follow me on @CryptoBossGamble & on ⚫️ 💎 Printing hard...#cryptobosscalls ✨

13🔥4🐳2🥰2

Signed M G || @CryptoBossCalls

15 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈1,940 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: x7! ⚡️ @CryptoBossGamble made a x7+ call on Robinhood Dog. $176K ➡️ $1.3M 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats ➡️Catch plays like this early with SpyDefi Filters!

🔥11🌚3🐳2😍2

Signed M G || @CryptoBossCalls

11 Jul 2026, 11:56 UTC≈2,320 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Hi

10🌚5🦄21🐳1

Signed M G || @CryptoBossCalls

27 Jun 2026, 12:57 UTC≈2,890 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2070853294105497817 Follow us on ⚫️ retweet #comments your wallet here Win big, I'll select winner 👑👑💎 Hit 🎯 massive like and retweet

🐳10🌚765💘5

Signed M G || @CryptoBossCalls

27 Jun 2026, 12:55 UTC≈4,020 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🗓 15 Day Report @CryptoBossGamble 📞 Total Calls: 72 ⚖️ Consistency: 54% 📊 Average Marketcap: $78K 🔗 Favoured Chain: ETH 👑 trelonaire ➡️ X142.3 $15K to $2.2M 2️⃣ Doge Trillionaire ➡️ X132 $18K to $2.3M 3️⃣ SPCX69 ➡️ X95.1 $25K to $2.4M 4️⃣ STARMIND ➡️ X58.4 $45K to $2.6M 5️⃣ Ro the Robber ➡️ X57.4 $26K to $1.5M 6️⃣ Asteroid Snail ➡️ X38.4 $49K to $1.9M 7️⃣ Emperor Kekius Maximus ➡️ X29.7 $15K to $457K 8️⃣ ETHLABS FU

🌚8💘6🐳5🔥5🥰5

Signed M G || @CryptoBossCalls

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoBossCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 950,508 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CRYPTO BOSS CALLS” (@CryptoBossCalls), 4,967 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoBossCalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.