Channel
@CryptoBarCalls000
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,181subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001568513255 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoBarCalls000 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoBarCalls000 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 1,181 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 1,184 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 1,186 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 1,186 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 31 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
42 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 11 | 26.2% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 23.8% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 21.4% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 9.52% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 7.14% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 7.14% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.38% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2024 to 29 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😍#MGBX | Top 3 Standout Tokens 🔥 Today’s Top Gainers 🔹 #BIO— $0.03523 🔹 #VINE— $0.01776 🔹 #ZKP — $0.09498 📈 These standout tokens are leading today’s market momentum and attracting strong trader attention across the platform. 🔍 Trade instantly on MGBX: https://mgbx.com 💎 New to MGBX? Unlock exclusive benefits today: https://www.mgbx.com/register/JlQlsXyW 👀 Stay alert to price action, volume shifts, and market s…
Signed Kk
JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 Treasury Secretary Bessent says the US is targeting Iran's "access to crypto." @WatcherGuru
Signed Kk
JUST IN: Elon Musk says AI "could kill us all" during OpenAI lawsuit testimony. @WatcherGuru
Signed Kk
$MMO-ETH🔥 Aped $MMO Megg, Mogg & Owl on erc20. Looks like the origin of Boysclub. https://www.dexview.com/eth/0xd5C2BcE25655ad44158Fa946564dc7BccFcB068D Story: https://www.tumblr.com/fureonnectarmoon-blog/131415788168/hey-matt-simon-said-hello-lol-okay-heres-the https://t.me/meggmoggowlportal
Signed Vincent Hokaro
Gambled some $KABOSHI in this dip Hearing good things about the team running by CTO. Good vol so far, find your entries around, Expecting a reversal movement from here. Dyor https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x87162ece32005d96d6e46e44fd2794f52995330a 0xd86830e9c56785E2b703EB0029aE71a943e4D442
Signed Vincent Hokaro
ETH hate rally commencing
🥰1
Signed Vincent Hokaro
$TROLL🔥✅X11.5 hit 42M and now at 22m which is a good entry point. Narrative is still alive and been doing good so far. Chart looks so primed and promising, might send more soon. DYOR😔 MISSOR : https://t.me/OGTROLLSOL https://x.com/i/communities/1913972267807121908 https://dexscreener.com/solana/5UUH9RTDiSpq6HKS6bp4NdU9PNJpXRXuiw6ShBTBhgH2 5UUH9RTDiSpq6HKS6bp4NdU9PNJpXRXuiw6ShBTBhgH2
👍1
Signed Vincent Hokaro
CRYPTO BAR CALLS pinned a photo
$PNUT🔥✅X40.5 hit the all time high of 2.4B and now sitting at bottom line of 130M. Team lining up some good move and will be used soon fellas💰. Load your bags😔 https://dexscreener.com/solana/4azrpnefcj7iw28rju5auyeqhycvdcnm8cswyl51ay9i https://x.com/pnutsolana https://t.me/pnutportal
🔥2👍1
Signed Vincent Hokaro
CRYPTO BAR CALLS pinned a photo
$OSE-SOL🔥 Gambled ape this one, doing good so far. Kinda good if you watch an entry here. Good candles forming💰 https://dexscreener.com/solana/3VL86va8NLWJsHkD4bMYStUUZD6t574qDYSjdnzqpump 3VL86va8NLWJsHkD4bMYStUUZD6t574qDYSjdnzqpump
🥰1
Signed Vincent Hokaro
CRYPTO BAR CALLS pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @CryptoBarCalls000. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 838,429 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CRYPTO BAR CALLS” (@CryptoBarCalls000), 1,181 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoBarCalls000.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.