Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Bad Market

Channel

Crypto Bad Market

@CryptoBadMarket

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

62,156subscribers

+13,042 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001230845568
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoBadMarket
Description⛳️ Crypto market insights | News, charts & blockchain updates Simple breakdowns of the crypto world — Bitcoin, Ethereum & more 📩 Owner: @MartinSarabio
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoBadMarket

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

262,15631,0797 August 2026 — 49,114 subscribers7 August 2026 — 49,114 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,113 subscribers8 August 2026 — 49,114 subscribers11 August 2026 — 49,120 subscribers12 August 2026 — 49,128 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2 subscribers19 August 2026 — 49,106 subscribers20 August 2026 — 49,103 subscribers21 August 2026 — 49,099 subscribers22 August 2026 — 49,097 subscribers24 August 2026 — 49,090 subscribers25 August 2026 — 49,116 subscribers26 August 2026 — 48,974 subscribers27 August 2026 — 48,896 subscribers28 August 2026 — 48,458 subscribers29 August 2026 — 48,093 subscribers30 August 2026 — 47,724 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3 subscribers10 September 2026 — 62,156 subscribers7 August 202610 September 2026
20 measurements spanning 34 days, net +13,042. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 01:2062,156+62,153
31 Aug 2026, 14:253-47,721
30 Aug 2026, 15:3547,724-369
29 Aug 2026, 13:4748,093-365
28 Aug 2026, 12:3548,458-438
27 Aug 2026, 11:1748,896-78
26 Aug 2026, 14:0848,974-142
25 Aug 2026, 13:3249,116+26
24 Aug 2026, 11:3349,090-7
22 Aug 2026, 15:5849,097-2
21 Aug 2026, 05:2749,099-4
20 Aug 2026, 06:1149,103-3
19 Aug 2026, 06:4549,106+49,104
13 Aug 2026, 07:482-49,126
12 Aug 2026, 05:0249,128+8
11 Aug 2026, 03:5249,120+6
8 Aug 2026, 23:0249,114+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:1449,113-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:0649,114no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:1549,114first reading

Engagement

95 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 62,156 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,960
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
58
of 95 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held95 (29 July 20269 September 2026)
Views total461,710
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Sept 2026, 01:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,840
Videos
11
Links
52

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 09:09 UTC≈11,700 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

🎗 #ETH ⏳ ✨ @CryptoBadMarket ✨

Signed #martin

9 Sept 2026, 07:33 UTC≈12,100 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

🎗 #TRUMP ✨ @CryptoBadMarket ✨

Signed #martin

9 Sept 2026, 07:05 UTC≈11,700 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

🎗 #XRP update 👌 ✨ @CryptoBadMarket ✨

Signed #martin

8 Sept 2026, 07:30 UTC≈15,000 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

🎗 #AEVO as long as it stays above 0.020, it’s not in a bad position. It can be worth analyzing further. ✨ @CryptoBadMarket ✨

Signed #martin

8 Sept 2026, 07:15 UTC≈14,600 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

🎗 #ARB I see a potential 1000% gain in this coin over the next year. If it drops below $0.13, I’ll buy some and hold it. ✨ @CryptoBadMarket ✨

Signed #martin

8 Sept 2026, 06:50 UTC≈12,700 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

🎗 #XRP Ripple has reached a pullback , it's better to wait for more confirmation before entering. Wait for the red zone to break before looking for an entry. ✨ @CryptoBadMarket ✨

Signed #martin

7 Sept 2026, 10:32 UTC≈13,100 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

🎗 #LTC/BTC Litecoin with the Bitcoin chart is interesting. After 1400 days, it seems like it's finally starting to change its trend. ✨ @CryptoBadMarket ✨

Signed #martin

7 Sept 2026, 10:24 UTC≈12,300 viewsread 10 September 2026

🎗 #ICP +20% 🔥 ✨ @CryptoBadMarket ✨

Signed #martin

7 Sept 2026, 10:24 UTC≈12,000 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

🎗 #INJ 1W Add List ✨ @CryptoBadMarket ✨

Signed #martin

7 Sept 2026, 07:05 UTC≈12,000 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

🎗 #BTC 4H We are currently in a range, and we can only move higher if this range breaks. The red line is significant because it marks the date of the U.S. interest rate announcement, which will influence the markets. 👀 Until that time, I don't expect any unusual movements, and for now, a 25 basis point increase in interest rates is predicted, which would be detrimental to the market. ✨ @CryptoBadMarket ✨

Signed #martin

7 Sept 2026, 06:38 UTC≈11,600 viewsread 10 September 2026
Photo

🎗 #GOLD ✨ @CryptoBadMarket ✨

Signed #martin

Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @CryptoBadMarket. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTCAnonymous Poll857 voters

Do you agree with me ?

  1. Yes !93%
  2. No 😮‍💨7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Bad Market” (@CryptoBadMarket), 62,156 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoBadMarket.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.