Channel
@CryptoAppaCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001581532298 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryptoAppaCalls |
| Description | This is not financial advice. Message @TheCryptoAppa for promotion. #AD means paid or soley for advertisement for project. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 1 January 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryptoAppaCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 21 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 21 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2022 to 18 January 2023. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Red Flag ($Red) Interesting take on a project that claims it's building a community for calling out red flags of projects/devs/etc. The wall of shame is a nice touch. Code looks good and safe. 📈https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x162496c21733b8c613be0407cf15dd926eda109e 🖥https://www.redflagcrypto.net
🚀STARLINK🚀 I will never stop talking about this project. The team is the real deal (check their website). When MetaVerse season circles back this will take off back towards 1 Billion MCap. Their MetaVerse/Game Producer worked at Sony as a Director, Senior Business Development Manager, and more. (https://www.linkedin.com/in/shahidahmad/) 🖥https://www.starltoken.com/ 📈https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0…
Crypto Appas Block pinned Deleted message
👮🏼♂️Commander Inu👮🏼♂️ This project peaked around 5 Million MCap. It was on a moon mission till the dev started fading out once the project hit resistance. No worries though. It was announced that the dev would be transferring ownership to the community. If and when that is officially announced I expect a nice pump. Keep an eye out it's only at 378k MCap currently. X10+ to ATH! 📈https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/p…
🐶PONGO INU🐶 Don't say I didn't tell you. Consolidating here. People exiting after profits. If a new floor is built this thing could run up like crazy. ➡️➡️https://t.me/CryptoAppaCalls/197⬅️⬅️
🐶PONGO INU🐶 X2 Back to ATH. A lot of potential here as a play short-midterm. 📈https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0x3ec6c3874f875de20278dd60cb5516dbfd1e379f 🗣https://t.me/pongoinutoken 🖥https://www.pongoinutoken.com 🐥https://twitter.com/Pongoinutoken *Update* Jeeted down. Recovered well. Chart looking great. Would not be surprised if it hits 1 Mill in the not so distant future.
🧀🐭SHARP CHEDDA🐭🧀 🟢🟢🟢🟢 x5 at the top from time of my initial share. 🟢🟢🟢🟢
🧊VODKA🧊 Only at 100k MCap. Decent momentum. Devs have fulfilled a lot of promises made. Feels like these days projects like these can make a run. 📈https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0xa93f30287f8437483cfbeb27b8fe5919b9bdcbaa 🗣https://t.me/vodkaeth 🖥https://www.vodkaeth.com/ *UPDATE* dead
🧀🐭SHARP CHEDDA🐭🧀 Following the trends. Potential is there for this to make a run. Keep an eye out. APE RESPONSIBLY. 📈https://www.dextools.io/app/ether/pair-explorer/0xabb44cd3be2460547b175522f0294dd9135cf25f 🗣https://t.me/SharpCheddaToken 🖥https://sharpcheddatoken.com
Crypto Appas Block pinned «StarLink ($Starl) will hit 1 Billion MCap by the end of 2022. (if crypto doesn't go into deep bear market) Check out the recent "leak" of their metaverse footage. https://twitter.com/StarLinkETH/status/1489726232971251713?s=20&t=5uR9C3-W8luAOHRMY9ayEw»
StarLink ($Starl) will hit 1 Billion MCap by the end of 2022. (if crypto doesn't go into deep bear market) Check out the recent "leak" of their metaverse footage. https://twitter.com/StarLinkETH/status/1489726232971251713?s=20&t=5uR9C3-W8luAOHRMY9ayEw
IMX is an Ethereum token that powers Immutable X, a scaling solution for NFTs that aims to enable near-instant, low fee transactions. IMX can be used for staking on Immutable X, voting on the future of the protocol, and paying transaction fees. 📈https://www.coinbase.com/price/immutable-x 🖥https://www.immutable.com/
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoAppaCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@CryptoAppaCalls named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Appas Block” (@CryptoAppaCalls), 21 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoAppaCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.