Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto28.hu

Channel

Crypto28.hu

@Crypto28_hu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,439subscribers

-47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002040026600
TypeChannel
Username@Crypto28_hu
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Crypto28_hu

Growth

7,4397,4907,464.57 August 2026 — 7,486 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,486 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,490 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,469 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,462 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,468 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,461 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,442 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,439 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 23 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,431–7,498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 20:457,439-3
27 Aug 2026, 19:537,442-19
24 Aug 2026, 10:437,461-7
20 Aug 2026, 10:437,468+6
17 Aug 2026, 21:247,462-7
14 Aug 2026, 16:477,469-21
10 Aug 2026, 21:417,490+4
7 Aug 2026, 13:167,486no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:077,486first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 7,439 subscribers
Avg views / post
970
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held34 (4 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total17,461
Reactions total834
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 23:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,404 reactions across 34 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥74352.9%
👍25017.8%
18713.3%
👀513.63%
🤔402.85%
👌332.35%
😱312.21%
👏281.99%
🤯181.28%
💯100.712%
🙏90.641%
🤝30.214%
🏆10.071%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,404reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 34 we hold a reading for · 29%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Crypto28_hu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC279 views56 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Sokan nem értik, hogy miért esik most a piac, ezért segítek: 📉 Bitcoin 📱 4 órás grafikonján jelenleg egy teljesen valid bearish divergencia alakult ki: miközben az árfolyam magasabb csúcsokra tört, az RSI már alacsonyabb csúcsokat produkált. Ez rövid távon pedig egyértelműen gyengülő momentumot jelez. 📊 Ezt nem szabad figyelmen kívül hagyni, viszont szerintem túlreagálni sem érdemes. 👀 A divergencia önmagában nem

🔥512👍2👌1

27 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC460 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Közeledhet az Altcoin Season... vagy azért ez mégsem ilyen egyszerű?❓ 👀 📊 A fenti ábra adatai szerint az altcoinok kereskedési volumene2️⃣éves csúcsra emelkedett, miközben az elmúlt napokban az #Ethereum nélküli altpiac kapitalizációja körülbelül 135 milliárd dollárral nőtt. 📈 Tehát több, mint 2 éve nem volt akkora forgalom az Altcoinokban, mint most... 🕯 ➡️ Ráadásul a tőke egyre látványosabban kezd elmozdulni $BT

🔥1510👀2🤔1🤝1

26 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC529 views31 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📉 Egy pozitív piaci időszakban is a befektetők jelentős része képes pénzt veszíteni... nézzük miért: ➖ FOMO és pánikeladás Amikor emelkedik a piac, sokan csak azért vásárolnak, mert félnek, hogy lemaradnak. Magas árakon beszállnak, majd az első 10–20%-os korrekciónál bepánikolnak és veszteségben eladnak. ➡️ Drágán vesznek, olcsón adnak el. Pont fordítva, mint kellene... ➖ A Spot profit után jön a tőkeáttétel Sokan

👍168👌3🤔2🔥1🤝1

24 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC687 views58 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026
Photo

#Ethereum elemzés 📱 Az elmúlt időszakban $ETH kifejezetten erős fordulatot mutatott. Az $1.450–$1.550 közötti régió ismét megtartotta az árfolyamot, ráadásul ez a zóna egy több éve épülő emelkedő trendvonallal is találkozott. 📈 Innen Ethereum közel 60%-os emelkedést produkált, és most elérkeztünk az első igazán komoly akadályhoz. 📌 $2.400 környéke: jelenleg ez a legfontosabb szint: A grafikonon jelölt régió korábba

55🔥2👏1

23 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC644 views110 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Kezdhetjük a hetet egy friss #Ethereum elemzéssel? 📱 Ő az egyik legfontosabb eszköz... főleg az Altcoinok szempontjából és rég volt már róla elemzés. 🕯 Nyomj egy 🔥-t és hozom a posztot.

🔥104🙏32👌1

21 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC883 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Ki hogy érzi, áttöri még a héten Bitcoin a $80.000 dolláros szintet, vagy inkább korrekcióra számítotok most már? 📱

  1. Szerintem még a héten 80k fölött leszünk. 🚀35%
  2. Ennyi volt az emelkedés, korrekcióra számítok. 📉43%
  3. Szerintem stagnálni fog az árfolyam most egy ideig... 🕯22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👀8🤔21👍1

20 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC940 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

$3.1 Milliárd dollárnyi Short pozció likvidálódott az elmúlt 24 órában 📈💵 #Bitcoin az elmúlt 24 órában több, mint $8.000-t emelkedett, és egészen $72.900-ig szúrt fel. 📱 Pontosan ezért veszélyes akkor Shortolni, amikor a piac már tele van Shortos kereskedőkkel... Egyetlen erősebb emelkedés elindítja a likvidálásokat, azok pedig tovább tüzelik az emelkedést. 🔥 ➡️ Ilyen erejű mozgást legutoljára tavaly októberben lá

🔥183👀3🤔1

20 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC868 views23 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

És megint aki nem volt a VIP-ben az lemaradt az emelkedésről... és nagy valószínűleg a pénzén ül. 👀💵 Pontosan 1 hónapja már arról beszélek a VIP tagoknak, hogy a piac valószínűleg nem fogja megadni azt a hatalmas beszakadást, amire akkor a befektetők 95%-a várt. 📉 Miközben a befektetők nagy része még $40–45.000 körüli #Bitcoin beszállókra várt, én már elkezdtem fokozatosan változtatni a stratégiámon: 💱 ➖Lezártam a

🔥16👍4👏2🤯1

19 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC810 views36 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Egy kis érdekesség a piacról... 📊 2025 januárja óta a Crypto teljesített a leggyengébben a nagyobb eszközosztályok közül. 📊 🥈 Ezüst: +107% 🔴 Réz: +66% 🥇 Arany: +60% 📈 Nasdaq: +38% 📊 Russell 2000: +31% Eközben: 📱 Bitcoin: -35% 📱 Ethereum: -47% 📊 Altcoinok: -57% Miközben a nemesfémek és a részvénypiac jelentős emelkedést produkáltak, addig a kriptopiac gyakorlatilag teljesen kimaradt ebből a tőkeáramlásból. 📈 Ez e

👌1711🔥3🤔3👍2

17 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC801 views124 reactions2 Starsread 28 August 2026

📊 Szeretnétek-e látni pár olyan posztot, ahol részletesebben kifejtem, hogy melyek azok a narratívák / tokenek, amelyekbe én biztosan NEM fektetnék a következő ciklusra? 👀 Mindenhol azt látjuk, hogy „ezt vedd”, „ebben van potenciál”, „ez lehet a következő 10x” stb… 📈 ➡️ Viszont szerintem legalább ennyire fontos tudni azt is, hogy mit érdemes messziről elkerülni. ❌ 🕯 Egy befektetésnél ugyanis nemcsak az számít, hog

🔥116🙏5💯3

12 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC≈1,270 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

📊 Történelmileg az augusztus egy kifejezetten gyenge hónap #Bitcoin számára. Az elmúlt 13 lezárt évből mindössze 4 alkalommal zárt pozitívan a $BTC augusztusban, ami mindössze 31%-os pozitív zárási arányt jelent. 📉 Ami azonban ennél is érdekesebb, hogy az augusztusi medián hozam -6,99%, ami az összes hónap közül a legrosszabb érték. 🔴 ➡️Ez azt jelenti, hogy bár az augusztusi átlag +1,20%, ezt néhány kiugróan erős

👀8🔥5👍43🤔1

9 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,460 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

A PI Network talán az egyik legjobb példája annak, hogy mekkora különbség lehet a hype és a valós értékek között. ⚠️ A $PI token indulását évekig óriási várakozás előzte meg, retail körökben sokan úgy tekintettek rá, mint ami megjelenése után a kriptopiac egyik legnagyobb trendje lehet. A $PI végül közel $3-ig emelkedett amegjelenését követően a tömegek miatt, majd értékének több mint 95%-át elveszítette. 📉📉📉 Példá

👍19😱5🔥4👏3💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @Crypto28_hu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTCAnonymous Poll263 voters

Ki hogy érzi, áttöri még a héten Bitcoin a $80.000 dolláros szintet, vagy inkább korrekcióra számítotok most már? 📱

  1. Szerintem még a héten 80k fölött leszünk. 🚀35%
  2. Ennyi volt az emelkedés, korrekcióra számítok. 📉43%
  3. Szerintem stagnálni fog az árfolyam most egy ideig... 🕯22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTCAnonymous Poll223 voters

Sziasztok srácok! 🍸 Lassan kezdek kilábalni a betegségből, ezért úgy döntöttem, hogy ti dönthetitek el, hogy miről hozzam a következő nagyobb elemzést: 📊

  1. $WLFI10%
  2. $ZEC22%
  3. $TRX13%
  4. $JUP19%
  5. $USDT36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto28.hu” (@Crypto28_hu), 7,439 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto28_hu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.