Channel
@Crypt0_Andrew_corner
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,199subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002115384521 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Crypt0_Andrew_corner |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Crypt0_Andrew_corner |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 1,199 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 1,202 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 1,204 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:39 | 1,204 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
59 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 27 | 45.8% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 23.7% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 22.0% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 8.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 April 2026 to 25 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
hey fam Added $HERMESOS and $evo on respective dips. $HERMESOS - serious doxxed dev with good project that actually makes sense and can boast of some solid adoption. $evo - autoresearch project, doxxed dev with great followers, new version should be out soon + good chart and cheap. Watchlist: $SUPERGEMMA, maybe $rootai. $SEDA and $RATSPEAK are doing well as privacy picked up again. I still like AI + privacy (FHE,…
❤4
GM Added some $NOOK - like the idea, chart and hard-working dev, aiming for 2-3x with short invalidation. On my buy list: $HERMESOS, $SUPERGEMMA $rootai. Watching $evo as well. $RAIL is pumping hard and see some chatter about AI privacy/security, might be a new sub-meta. Also see some chatter around $MRND - x402 infra. Pumped hard, will wait for a dip while checking updates. All our other bags are doing well. It…
❤7
hey fam if you're in $MOLTEN with me, posted a short thread about it, would appreciate any engagement. More eyes > more attention > better PA. https://x.com/Crypt0_Andrew/status/2058204016337940620 other than that nothing interesting, mainly watching some established projects for entries like HERMESOS, NOOK etc enjoy your weekend
🤝5
Hey fam Nothing new, still holding $ETHY and $MOLTEN, the former is doing well, the latter got some sell pressure from old wallets, but many of them are out, so should do well. I plan to do a deep write-up tmr. Sold $PRX mainly due to the low volume and weak chart. Have no bags on Solana atm, only Base. On Base I also like this one - 0x572c4fA77623652411574c51B5dDB7e1b750AbA3 Mainly because the dev is giga brain …
❤3
Hey guys Added more $MOLTEN (same thesis: good dev, interesting product, product launches are coming - catalysts, profitable migration for holders) and $ETHY - V2 launches on 28/05 which marks that start of multiple product launches, active team, good chart and support on CT. Will prob right deeper posts about both tomorrow. Also on my watchlist: $INSTACLAW $CLAWBANK $HERMESOS Still don't want to spread too much a…
👍3
Hello guys Flying back home from vacation (that’s why was inactive). Fully out from $AEON, I don’t even know how many Xs it’s done since I shared (my entry was around 330k MC), should be around 40x. If you’re still in, I’d consider TPing here. $MOLTEN is also 2x, think it has more room for growth given the migration mechanics (MC will be higher after migration), good tech and hard-working dev. $PRX - roundtripped…
🔥7
gm guys not very active today due irl stuff, but some quick updates TLDR: privacy + AI is getting attention, Base is getting more and more runners, while Solana is not that active atm. DeSci hype has faded for now. Robotics - waiting for the Virtuals event to see updates. Sold $FOLD as DeSci meta is fading away, $BIOLLM - still has a moonbag, if it goes below the local minimum, I will sell it too. $BIO is looking …
❤3
gm Added $PRX on a dip last night, did not share as I was basically sleeping when bought it. All eyes on their speech tomorrow, might be some interesting updates. Ngl midcurved $ROGUEAI (new meme game for humans and AI agents on Base) earlier today as previous GameFi projects topped at 300-500k MC. Anyway added it to my watchlist, will observe. On my watchlist: $PEPTM (another peptide related project, strives to c…
🔥3
gm guys rather slow day Cut all new peptides plays (ngl charts look bad), it is what it is - part of the game, only holding $BIOLLM and $FOLD from this meta as they are established and charts still look ok. This is why you should always TP some along the way up in this market, at least $BIOLLM and $FOLD have already covered majority of losses, but ngl I expected more from this meta. Anyway all eyes on $BIO and lat…
👍5
gm guys Brutal correction on some of our peptides tokens, still holding everything as I firmly believe that we are rather early + they all are dirty cheap. Took some more profits on $BIOLLM and $FOLD, but still holding nice bags. So far happy with my desci portfolio, but will likely play $PEPTAI once it launches on Base (curated by $BIO) and maybe $EXMPLR as it will benefit from $PEPTAI success. It is important to…
$BIOLLM is on an absolute tear, took 50% of my initial size off, but think it goes way higher together with the whole peptide meta
🔥2
this shit is going nuts
❤3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Crypt0_Andrew_corner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypt0_Andrew's Corner” (@Crypt0_Andrew_corner), 1,199 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypt0_Andrew_corner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.