Veil Exchange x2 from Call 3m~ 6m 🏆 Congratulations to the team and the entire community. It seems like this is just the beginning of the growth 🚀
🎉2🔥1
![Telegram profile photo for Crypto Branders [CALLS]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/99/9987b38e90d64ce11a2c320d8117b3f03e034ba0a9bf1e784f54fd1ebc472e0a.jpg)
Channel
@CryproBrandersCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002121634935 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryproBrandersCalls |
| Created | 6 November 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryproBrandersCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 5 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 5 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 6 November 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
50 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 60.0% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 22.0% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 12.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.00% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 2.00% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2023 to 11 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Veil Exchange x2 from Call 3m~ 6m 🏆 Congratulations to the team and the entire community. It seems like this is just the beginning of the growth 🚀
🎉2🔥1
GROK DIAMOND HANDS ONLY 💎🫡
Crypto Branders [CALLS] pinned a photo
Culture Call 🏆🚀
🔥5🎉1
Veil Exchange ~ ATH around 3.4 m Mcap Now ~ 3 m Mcap Veil Exchange is looking very promising. There's a very good team behind it and a strong community. It might do a few more X's in short time. * BTC 37.000 $ Chart : https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xac9ae0eb05daee73bd964eaa0153b762d6455667 Tg: https://t.me/VeilExchange Website: https://veil.exchange Twitter : https://x.com/VeilExch…
🔥5
It's hard to find a safer crypto project 🏆
🎉2
Crypto Branders [CALLS] pinned a photo
AgaTech [BSC] ATH around 340 MCap Now 340 k Mcap The project is around one week old, and the chart looks beautiful. 🚀 Now available on: -PancakeSwap __ ~ AgaTech has undergone two audits by CheckDot and Cyberscoope. ~ The entire AgaTech team is fully KYC verified. The AgaTech ecosystem includes: *CoinMarketFacts *AiGata *AnyHolderWallet *AgaSky *Lambro 2.0 *AgaSwap __ Chart: https://www.dextools.io/app/en/…
👏1🤩1
Our first call in the new group. #Pepe2 Please join and share some love ❤️🤝
❤4🥰1
Pepe 2.0 [ETH] From ATH of ~100M Market Cap to Current 18.5M Now available on: -KuCoin -Gate io -ByBit -Poloniex -Bidget -MEXC -LBank -NovaDAX -Bitrue -Bigmart -DigiFinex -Uniswap We've decided to make this our inaugural call on the new channel. With a stellar team and a supportive community, Pepe 2.0 is positioned for a swift rebound to its All-Time High. 🏆 Especially given its presence on numerous CEXs even i…
❤26🎉1
Channel name was changed to «Crypto Branders [CALLS]»
Channel created
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @CryproBrandersCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Branders [CALLS]” (@CryproBrandersCalls), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryproBrandersCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.