Channel
@CrossCurveMetaLayer_CIS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,529subscribers
-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001423297517 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CrossCurveMetaLayer_CIS |
| Description | Готовая к интеграции инфраструктура с доступом к глубокой ликвидности DeFi и ведущим протоколам интероперабельности, позволяющая автоматизировать on-chain операции за пределами EVM благодаря gasless-исполнению и передовой кроссчейн-маршрутизации. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CrossCurveMetaLayer_CIS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 9,529 | -58 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 9,587 | -17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 9,604 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 9,604 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 15 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (15 April 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,005 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
✨ После шести лет работы мы приняли решение завершить развитие CrossCurve. То, что начиналось в 2020 году как идея кросс-чейн инфраструктуры, прошло большой путь: от первого прототипа и хакатонов до полноценного набора продуктов и технологий, которыми пользовались сотни тысяч людей. Спасибо нашим пользователям, инвесторам, партнерам, разработчикам, поставщикам ликвидности, участникам DAO и всему сообществу. Мы сдел…
⚠️ Напоминание: выведите средства из старого Token Bridge CrossCurve Уважаемые пользователи! В рамках процесса восстановления моста CrossCurve возможность вывода средств была восстановлена ещё в нескольких сетях. В старых контрактах моста по-прежнему остаются средства в нескольких сетях, включая Blast, Taiko, Optimism, Avalanche, BNB Chain, Polygon, Base, Gnosis, Linea, Fraxtal, Celo и Sonic. Если у вас всё ещё о…
CrossCurve MetaLayer выходит за пределы EVM 🚀 Solana интегрирована в CrossCurve как часть кросс-чейн роутинга, открывая для вас бесшовные свопы в одной из самых активных non-EVM экосистем Web3. Это структурная эволюция: от роутинга только внутри EVM к по-настоящему мульти-экосистемной инфраструктуре, построенной для масштаба, доступа к ликвидности и эффективного исполнения. Уже доступно: 🔘 Кросс-чейн свопы EVM ↔ …
Блокчейн Fantom завершает свою работу 30 июня 2026, поэтому напоминаем о необходимости вывести свои средства из Fantom и EYWA bridge в частности https://x.com/i/status/2066551305628197060
CrossCurve CIS pinned a photo
⚠️ Восстановление CrossCurve Token Bridge в режиме вывода средств Уважаемые пользователи, В рамках процесса восстановления bridge-инфраструктуры CrossCurve, подвергшейся взлому, мы временно открыли доступ к выводу средств из старого моста. Если у вас всё ещё остались средства — их необходимо вывести в течение 12 дней с момента анонса. На данный момент в контрактах старого моста по-прежнему находится более $200,00…
🟢 Работа агрегатора CrossCurve MetaLayer восстановлена После серии технических работ и инфраструктурных обновлений, проведённых в рамках подготовки к предстоящим релизам, мы рады сообщить, что агрегатор CrossCurve MetaLayer вновь доступен для пользователей. Это только начало следующих крупных обновлений экосистемы CrossCurve. Впереди — релиз обновлённого Token Bridge с поддержкой OFT, перезапуск Consensus Bridge и …
🇹🇷 CrossCurve на BlockchainX Istanbul! 16 мая наш CEO Борис Поварь выступит спикером на BlockchainX Istanbul — одном из крупнейших Web3-мероприятий региона, объединяющем ведущие блокчейн-проекты, инфраструктурные команды, инвесторов и билдеров со всего мира. Борис поделится экспертным видением рынка: от текущего состояния cross-chain DeFi до ключевых инфраструктурных вызовов и будущего interoperability. Также он р…
🛡 CrossCurve успешно прошёл реаудит Consensus Bridge от MixBytes В рамках усиления безопасности CrossCurve Consensus Bridge успешно прошёл реаудит после предыдущей атаки. Проверка была направлена на подтверждение корректности внесённых изменений, а также на дальнейшее повышение устойчивости и надёжности системы. Этот аудит завершает запланированный цикл проверок и закладывает основу для предстоящего релиза и деплоя…
📝 Апрель 2026: Recap CrossCurve Апрель стал для CrossCurve месяцем важных подготовительных работ: активное присутствие на ключевых индустриальных событиях и фокусная работа над надёжностью инфраструктуры. ✔️ Конференции Наш CEO, Борис Поварь, принял участие в Paris Blockchain Week — неделе интенсивных встреч с ведущими игроками рынка: Bitstamp, Robinhood, Liquity, Enigma, FrankenCoin, Webacy, Chainlabs, DefiScan, …
🚧 Плановое техническое обслуживание В рамках предстоящего релиза и деплоя обновлённой инфраструктуры — включая Token Bridge с поддержкой OFT и Consensus Bridge — работа агрегатора CrossCurve MetaLayer в ближайшее время будет приостановлена. В этот период обмены будут недоступны. Мы уведомим вас, как только система будет восстановлена. Благодарим за понимание — следите за обновлениями.
🔍 Последние обновления CrossCurve, которые вы могли пропустить На пороге финального этапа аудита и предстоящего релиза обновлённого Consensus Bridge и Token Bridge с поддержкой OFT-стандарта LayerZero делимся текущим статусом. За последний период мы прошли серию независимых аудитов ключевых компонентов системы от Hashlock, SmartState и Hexens. Каждый аудит включал детальную проверку архитектуры, логики контрактов и…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @CrossCurveMetaLayer_CIS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 96,819 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CrossCurve CIS” (@CrossCurveMetaLayer_CIS), 9,529 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CrossCurveMetaLayer_CIS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.