Happy Independence Day ! 🇮🇳❤️

Channel
Cricbuzz™ Line...
@CricbuzzLineOriginal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,363subscribers
-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001474673180 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CricbuzzLineOriginal |
| Created | 30 October 2020 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CricbuzzLineOriginal |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 11,363 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 11,366 | -10 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:29 | 11,376 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 11,384 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 11,390 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 11,393 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 11,398 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 11,411 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 11,416 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 11,417 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 30 October 2020 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.07%
- avg views ÷ 11,363 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 122
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (30 October 2020 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 122 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 37s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Voice message, posted without a caption
IPL start ho chuka hai... Agar aap meri tip par khel kar paisa kamana chahte ho to aa jao... Yahan par mai apko daily open free matches karaunga... Bahut shandaar kaam chal raha... Join Baadshah Channel Link... 👇 https://t.me/Baadshah
Official Announcement Get ready ! #TATAIPL2026 is all set to start from the 28th of MARCH !
IPL se work re-start karenge ✔️
SUPER FAST SCORE UPDATE ⚡️ 🏆 Latest Updates 📅 Match Schedule & Teams 📰 Latest News & Match Analysis 🏏 Results & Stats 🤫 NO BAKBAK ONLY WORK 🤫✌️ Keep Sharing Genuine Original Oldest CRICBUZZ LINE LINK👇🏻 https://t.me/CricbuzzLineOriginal
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @CricbuzzLineOriginal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Livee_scoree_Line · 117,240
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 15 August 2026
@BadshahCricketkings · 107,244
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cricbuzz™ Line...” (@CricbuzzLineOriginal), 11,363 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CricbuzzLineOriginal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.