Ролку объявляю вымершей, хотя у меня изначально не было высоких ожиданий немножко жаль. У владельца, то бишь меня и глав админа нету времени и сил, скорее всего ролка будет закрыта.

Channel
𝙲𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚢 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍
@Crazy_World_0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001857536693 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Crazy_World_0 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 19 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Crazy_World_0 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 3 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Videos
- 16
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 45s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 8 | 32.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 16.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 12.0% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 12.0% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 4.00% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2023 to 4 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
✹】※⸻⭒『⚝』⭒⸻※【✹ ☾𝙲𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚢 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍☽ ✰ᥴrᥱᥲᴛ᧐r: #Резеф ✮ᴛᥱ᥊ᴛ: для моего мужа ✩ɦᥲsɦᴛᥲg: #видео
👍1
✹】※⸻⭒『⚝』⭒⸻※【✹ ☾𝙲𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚢 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍☽ ✰ᥴrᥱᥲᴛ᧐r: #Юджин ✮ᴛᥱ᥊ᴛ: основано на реальных событиях ахаххвхвх ✩ɦᥲsɦᴛᥲg: #мем
✹】※⸻⭒『⚝』⭒⸻※【✹ ☾𝙲𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚢 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍☽ ✰ᥴrᥱᥲᴛ᧐r: #Аᥴᴛᥱρ_𐌡ᥙᴛ᥊ᥙ ✮ᴛᥱ᥊ᴛ: ОН РЕАЛЬНО ИГНОРЬШИК! ПХАХАХА ✩ɦᥲsɦᴛᥲg: #мем
🤣1
✹】※⸻⭒『⚝』⭒⸻※【✹ ☾𝙲𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚢 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍☽ ✰ᥴrᥱᥲᴛ᧐r: #Аᥴᴛᥱρ_𐌡ᥙᴛ᥊ᥙ ✮ᴛᥱ᥊ᴛ: жиза нашей ролки ✩ɦᥲsɦᴛᥲg: #мем
✹】※⸻⭒『⚝』⭒⸻※【✹ ☾𝙲𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚢 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍☽ ✰ᥴrᥱᥲᴛ᧐r: #Аᥴᴛᥱρ_𐌡ᥙᴛ᥊ᥙ ✮ᴛᥱ᥊ᴛ: старая идея ✩ɦᥲsɦᴛᥲg: #видео
🔥1🤩1
✹】※⸻⭒『⚝』⭒⸻※【✹ ☾𝙲𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚢 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍☽ ✰ᥴrᥱᥲᴛ᧐r: #Аᥴᴛᥱρ_𐌡ᥙᴛ᥊ᥙ ✮ᴛᥱ᥊ᴛ: наши прекрасные девушки ✩ɦᥲsɦᴛᥲg: #видео
❤1🍾1🔥1
✹】※⸻⭒『⚝』⭒⸻※【✹ ☾𝙲𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚢 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍☽ ✰ᥴrᥱᥲᴛ᧐r: #Аᥴᴛᥱρ_𐌡ᥙᴛ᥊ᥙ ✮ᴛᥱ᥊ᴛ: ))) ✩ɦᥲsɦᴛᥲg: #видео
🔥2🤩1
✹】※⸻⭒『⚝』⭒⸻※【✹ ☾𝙲𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚢 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍☽ ✰ᥴrᥱᥲᴛ᧐r: #Аᥴᴛᥱρ_𐌡ᥙᴛ᥊ᥙ ✮ᴛᥱ᥊ᴛ: изначально, я брак не планировал, пхахаахах ✩ɦᥲsɦᴛᥲg: #видео
❤2💋1🔥1
✹】※⸻⭒『⚝』⭒⸻※【✹ ☾𝙲𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚢 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍☽ ✰ᥴrᥱᥲᴛ᧐r: #Аᥴᴛᥱρ_𐌡ᥙᴛ᥊ᥙ ✮ᴛᥱ᥊ᴛ: и все же я человек противоречие... ✩ɦᥲsɦᴛᥲg: #видео
👍1🔥1
✹】※⸻⭒『⚝』⭒⸻※【✹ ☾𝙲𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚢 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍☽ ✰ᥴrᥱᥲᴛ᧐r: #Аᥴᴛᥱρ_𐌡ᥙᴛ᥊ᥙ ✮ᴛᥱ᥊ᴛ: хпапхахаа ✩ɦᥲsɦᴛᥲg: #видео
👍1
☽⋆》⸻«В𐋏И𐌑А𐋏ИЕ»⸻《⋆☾ Ищᥱⲙ ⲙужᥲ д᧘я 𐌺ᥱᥔ᧘ᥲ 𐌗ᥱнᥙᴛьюᤋᥲ 𐋏ᥲ дᥲнныᥔ ⲙ᧐ⲙᥱнᴛ ʙᥱдуᴛᥴя ᥰ᧐ᥙᥴκᥙ А᧘ьδᥱρу 𐌺ρ᧐ᥴᥴⲙᥲнᥲ, ⲙужᥲ д᧘я 𐌺ᥱᥔ᧘ᥲ 𐌗ᥱнᥙᴛьюᤋᥲ. 𐌿ρ᧐ᥰᥲ᧘ ᥙ д᧐ ᥴᥙ᥊ ᥰ᧐ρ нᥱ нᥲᥔдᥱн. Еᥴ᧘ᥙ нᥲᥔдёᴛᥱ, ᥙ᧘ᥙ ϶ᴛ᧐ ʙы, ᧐ᴛᥰᥙɯᥙᴛᥱᥴь ʙ κ᧐ⲙⲙᥱнᴛᥲρᥙя᥊ ᥙ᧘ᥙ ᥴ᧐᧐δщᥙᴛᥱ ᴦ᧘ᥲʙ.ᥲдⲙᥙну ᥙ᧘ᥙ ʙ᧘ᥲдᥱ᧘ьцу. 𑀝ᥰᥲᥴᥙδ᧐ ᤋᥲ ʙнᥙⲙᥲнᥙᥱ. ✧】✶⸻⭒『❦』⭒⸻✶【✧
💋1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Crazy_World_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,424,345 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 8
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 8
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@Crazy_World_0 named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙲𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚢 𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍” (@Crazy_World_0), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crazy_World_0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.