Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CrazySnep Animations

@CrazySnep

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,491subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001163011189
TypeChannel
Username@CrazySnep
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CrazySnep

Growth

2,4912,4952,4936 August 2026 — 2,495 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,495 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,493 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,491 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,490–2,496 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:562,491-2
9 Aug 2026, 20:122,493-2
6 Aug 2026, 11:162,495no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:382,495first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5,233 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53213356264301600952,25543.1%
custom 53259658373984501151,03219.7%
custom 545617462574449376060311.5%
3115.94%
custom 52426039109122867952755.26%
❤‍🔥1843.52%
👎1372.62%
👍1192.27%
🎉691.32%
custom 5237814421081824966561.07%
510.975%
🤬450.86%
😁250.478%
🔥180.344%
😍170.325%
🤨160.306%
😱60.115%
😈50.096%
🦄50.096%
😢40.076%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,233reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2023 to 2 May 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 May 2024, 12:10 UTC≈69,000 views1,480 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 #info Telegram made a dick move by tying custom emoji reactions to channel boosts which scale freaking linearly with subscribers. They also added random exclusive useless features like stories and link colors. Enshittification intensifies. 👎 However... I do kinda want custom emoji reactions. 💃 And my own boosts aren't enough to get there. So... If you're subscribed to Telegram Premium and want this channel

custom 5321335626430160095684custom 5325965837398450115354custom 5456174625744493760219custom 5242603910912286795124❤‍🔥58custom 523781442108182496641

2 May 2024, 10:52 UTC≈63,300 views622 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 5321335626430160095386custom 5325965837398450115103custom 54561746257444937608431❤‍🔥10😁8

25 Apr 2024, 21:29 UTCviews —

CrazySnep Animations pinned «🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Commissions open closed! #commissions Pricing The price for one animated sticker starts at $20, which includes one character head/bust. If the character or the composition is complex, the price may be higher. The maximum commission batch is 5…»

25 Apr 2024, 21:29 UTC≈62,800 views156 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Commissions open closed! #commissions Pricing The price for one animated sticker starts at $20, which includes one character head/bust. If the character or the composition is complex, the price may be higher. The maximum commission batch is 5 stickers. Payment is through Boosty, which currently supports only bank cards. I’m working on getting HipoLink to work in order accept payments via PayPal, but it'

custom 5321335626430160095103🎉1817👍8👎5😈5

25 Apr 2024, 21:29 UTC≈45,400 views296 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 5325965837398450115125custom 532133562643016009594custom 545617462574449376044🤨16custom 523781442108182496611❤‍🔥6

25 Apr 2024, 21:28 UTC≈43,700 views124 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 #irl Well, uhm, I'm 4 days away from getting my Internet access cut off, 7 days away from my bank getting angry at me, about a week away from running out of cat food, I'm sustaining myself on pasta with nothing on it, and the person I've borrowed from to calm my bank down is close to that state too. So, uh, as much as that situation succeeded in kicking me in my depressed butt, I'm deep enough in the mes

custom 532133562643016009549custom 524260391091228679539custom 532596583739845011520👍7❤‍🔥5custom 52378144210818249664

25 Apr 2024, 19:53 UTC≈40,800 views1,099 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 5321335626430160095516custom 5456174625744493760247custom 532596583739845011521685❤‍🔥2015

24 Apr 2024, 17:31 UTC≈39,800 views198 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 532133562643016009515220🤬10😁7👍54

23 Apr 2024, 10:15 UTC≈37,600 views117 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 524260391091228679543custom 532596583739845011535❤‍🔥19👎14🦄51

23 Apr 2024, 06:20 UTC≈35,600 views97 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53213356264301600953322👎15custom 532596583739845011513custom 524260391091228679510👍4

20 Apr 2024, 21:38 UTC≈34,500 views199 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 532133562643016009590custom 53259658373984501156419😁10👎9❤‍🔥7

20 Apr 2024, 13:24 UTC≈33,800 views204 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👎8267🤬35❤‍🔥115😢4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CrazySnep. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 612,382 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CrazySnep Animations” (@CrazySnep), 2,491 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CrazySnep.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.