Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 88 days, net +1,101. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,696–10,472 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 07:07
10,021
-13
3 Nov 2026, 07:56
10,034
-13
2 Nov 2026, 10:46
10,047
-15
1 Nov 2026, 07:19
10,062
-13
31 Oct 2026, 09:09
10,075
-13
30 Oct 2026, 09:38
10,088
-32
29 Oct 2026, 09:49
10,120
-22
28 Oct 2026, 07:27
10,142
-27
27 Oct 2026, 10:46
10,169
-11
26 Oct 2026, 10:45
10,180
-9
25 Oct 2026, 14:06
10,189
-18
24 Oct 2026, 15:39
10,207
-16
23 Oct 2026, 16:26
10,223
+2
22 Oct 2026, 13:31
10,221
-11
21 Oct 2026, 04:48
10,232
+42
20 Oct 2026, 02:31
10,190
-6
18 Oct 2026, 23:35
10,196
+11
17 Oct 2026, 21:18
10,185
+13
16 Oct 2026, 17:50
10,172
+11
15 Oct 2026, 20:07
10,161
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 28 January 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
8
Videos
1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
310 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
185
59.7%
🔥
67
21.6%
👍
58
18.7%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 310 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 9 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Real cow raisers should move faster.
CowHub is improving the growth rules.
Users who actually raise cows, collect milk, and bring real active users will get more room to grow.
Empty accounts should not take value from real players.
The next stage will reward real activity, not fake numbers. 🐄
🐄 What should CowHub build next?
More earning power, or more fun gameplay? We want the next step to match what users really want. Vote below and help shape CowHub’s next direction. 🥛
🥛 Higher milk output51%
💎 More TON earning paths68%
🐄 More fun cow gameplay30%
🧀 More dairy product features21%
The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🐄 Current milk collection matters for the future.
CowHub isn't stopping at simple milk production. 🥛
We're launching a dairy path: milk will create more products, not just sit as a number. 🧀 Cheese is just one direction.
More dairy products will make milk more useful and give users more reasons to keep raising cows. That's why this stage matters.
Users producing milk now are building the base for what comes next.…
🐄 Milk is just the beginning.
CowHub is moving beyond simple production.
🥛 Milk creates output.
🧀 Dairy products create value.
💎 TON gives the path a real destination.
The goal is not more steps.
The goal is a stronger cow-raising economy.
Raise. Produce. Process. Earn.
CowHub is entering its next layer. 🐄
📊 CowHub Event Idea
We’re planning a simple event 👇 🎥 Share CowHub videos on YouTube 👀 Get views 🏆 Top 5 views win rewards That’s it — simple and fair. Would you join?
1️⃣ 🔥 Yes, I’m in65%
2️⃣ 👍 Maybe (depends on rewards)23%
2️⃣ 👍 Maybe (depends on rewards)12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
CowHub was never designed to be just another mini app.
It was built as a simple production system ⚙️
where activity becomes output 🐄
and output becomes value 💰
Simple enough for anyone to enter,
structured enough to keep growing 📈
No hype.
No noise.
Just a system that works.
And this is only the beginning 🚀
🐄 CowHub is growing. Are you in?
Start with 1 cow
➡️ Grow your farm
➡️ Produce more milk
➡️ Earn more TON 💰
The more cows you have,
the faster your income scales. 📈
Early players are already building their farms…
and turning milk into real TON.
Don’t wait. Start your Cow Empire today 🚀
CowHub just updated: you don’t even need to collect milk anymore 🐄
🥛 Milk production = auto collected
💎 Automatically accumulates → convert to TON
Now it’s truly:
Open the app = earn instantly
Simpler. Easier. Effortless.
👉 This is the smoothest version so far
Understand in 1 minute:
🐄 Feed cows
🥛 Collect milk
💎 Milk converts directly to TON
Many users are already earning 8.8 TON daily
No complexity. No thinking required.
It’s basically a “daily money-claiming” game.
❤6🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @CowHubNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🐄 What should CowHub build next?
More earning power, or more fun gameplay? We want the next step to match what users really want. Vote below and help shape CowHub’s next direction. 🥛
🥛 Higher milk output51%
💎 More TON earning paths68%
🐄 More fun cow gameplay30%
🧀 More dairy product features21%
The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📊 CowHub Event Idea
We’re planning a simple event 👇 🎥 Share CowHub videos on YouTube 👀 Get views 🏆 Top 5 views win rewards That’s it — simple and fair. Would you join?
1️⃣ 🔥 Yes, I’m in65%
2️⃣ 👍 Maybe (depends on rewards)23%
2️⃣ 👍 Maybe (depends on rewards)12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 9 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CowHub News” (@CowHubNews), 10,021 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CowHubNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.